Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the Risk of Future Psychological Abuse: Predicting the Accuracy of Battered Women’s Predictions

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building on a handful of studies demonstrating battered women’s accuracy in assessing their risk of being physically reabused, this study examined how accurately victims assess their risk of future psychological abuse. Participants’ ratings of the likelihood that their partner would engage in controlling/dominance behaviors or efforts to humiliate/degrade them in the coming year and their reports 18 months later of whether this had actually occurred were used to create a four category version of accuracy (true positive, false positive, true negative, false negative). Victims were more likely to be right than wrong in their assessments of risk; PTSD symptoms, the recency of physical violence, and the degree of stalking and psychological abuse in the relationship predicted membership in the four accuracy categories. These findings overlap considerably with those examining victim accuracy in predicting physical abuse and inform ongoing debates about the value of incorporating victims’ insights into risk assessment efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is important to note that these women were not necessarily individuals who were unsure about what would happen during the next year. Given our use of a sum score, some of these participants were actually quite sure that one event would happen in the next year (rating of 5) but also quite sure that another would not (rating of 1). Analyses not detailed here revealed that dropping participants with sum scores of 6, including them with participants whose sum scores were from 1 to 5, and including them with participants whose sum scores were from 7 to 10 all resulted in very similar findings.

  2. It would have been optimal to have a more precise match between the time frame for which Time 1 risk was assessed (one year) and the time period for which reabuse was assessed (18 months). This was not feasible given the data available. We felt however that victims’ assessments of risk over the next year and their assessments of risk over the next 18 months would likely be very similar, such that the mismatch would have minimal impact on the validity of our results.

References

  • Arias, I. (1999). Women’s response to physical and psychological abuse. In X. B. Arriagaa & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 139–161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., & Pape, K. T. (1999). Psychological abuse: Implications for adjustment and commitment to leave violent partners. Violence & Victims, 14(1), 55–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett Cattaneo, L. (2007). Contributors to assessments of risk in intimate partner violence: How victims and professionals differ. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett Cattaneo, L., Bell, M. E., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2007). Intimate partner violence victims’ accuracy in assessing their risk of reabuse. Journal of Family Violence (in press).

  • Bennett Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. A. (2003). Victim-reported risk factors for continued abusive behavior: Assessing the dangerousness of arrested batterers. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. A. (2007). New directions in IPV risk assessment: An empowerment approach to risk management. In K. Kendall-Tackett, & S. Giacomoni (Eds.), Intimate partner violence (in press).

  • Bennett, L., Goodman, L., & Dutton, M. A. (2000). Risk assessment among batterers arrested for domestic assault: The salience of psychological abuse. Violence Against Women, 6(11), 1190–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. B., Jones-Alexander, J., Buckley, T. C., & Forneris, C. A. (1996). Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 34, 669–673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, M. P. (2001). Legal help-seeking experiences of former intimate-stalking victims. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12(2), 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1988). Interacting systems in human development: Research paradigms: Present and future. In N. Bolger, A. Caspi, G. Downey, & M. Moorehouse (Eds.), Persons in context: Developmental processes. Human development in cultural and historical contexts (pp. 25–49). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (1997). Working toward freedom from violence: The process of change in battered women. Violence Against Women, 3(1), 5–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C. (1995). Prediction of homicide of and by battered women. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (pp. 96–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. G. Sarason, & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 73–94). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., Lyon, E., & Monti-Catania, D. (1998). Safety planning with battered women: Complex lives/difficult choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, M. A., & Stalans, L. J. (1995). Police referrals to shelters and mental health treatment: Examining their decisions in domestic assault cases. Crime & Delinquency, 41(4), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, M. A., & Stalans, L. J. (1997). The influence of gender and mental state on police decisions in domestic assault cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(2), 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 5(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W., & Heckert, D. A. (2003). Determinants of women’s perceptions of risk in battering relationships. Violence & Victims, 18, 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A., Dutton, M. A., Weinfurt, K., & Cook, S. (2003). The Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index. Violence Against Women, 9(2), 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall Smith, P., Thornton, G. E., DeVellis, R., Earp, J., & Coker, A. L. (2002). A population-based study of the prevalence and distinctiveness of battering, physical assault, and sexual assault in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(10), 1208–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Battered women’s perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 778–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., & Kahn, R. L. (1985). Measures and concepts of social support. In S. Cohen, & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 83–108). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Gortner, E., Berns, S., & Shortt, J. W. (1996). Psychological factors in the longitudinal course of battering: When do the couples split up? When does the abuse decrease? Violence & Victims, 11(4), 371–392.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Arias, I. (1999). Psychological abuse and depressive symptoms in dating women: Do different types of abuse have differential effects? Journal of Family Violence, 14(3), 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, V. A. (2004). Psychological abuse of women: A review of the literature. The Family Journal, 12(4), 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, D. R. (1996). Predicting unpredictability: A model of women’s processes of predicting battering men’s violence. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 10, 371–385.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Litz, B. T., & Keane, T. M. (1989). Information processing in anxiety disorders: Application to the understanding of posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. L. (1999). Effects of men’s subtle and overt psychological abuse on low-income women. Violence & Victims, 14(1), 69–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. M., & Hoover, S. A. (1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence & Victims, 14, 39–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence. Violence & Victims, 14(1), 3–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 19, 276–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehl, J., O’Sullivan, C., Webster, D., & Campbell, J. (2005). Intimate partner violence risk assessment validation study: The RAVE study practitioner summary and recommendations. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 10(1), 65–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of a psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence & Victims, 4(3), 159–177.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1999). The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. Violence & Victims, 14(1), 25–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Herman, D. S., Huska, J. A., & Keane, T. M. (1993, October). The PTSD checklist: Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, TX.

  • Weisz, A. N., Tolman, R. M., & Saunders, D. G. (2000). Assessing the risk of severe violence: The importance of survivors’ predictions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the contributions made by everyone who has worked on this longitudinal project but particularly wish to thank Jane Murphy and Dorothy Lennig, and to express appreciation for the funding provided by The National Institute of Justice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margret E. Bell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, M.E., Cattaneo, L.B., Goodman, L.A. et al. Assessing the Risk of Future Psychological Abuse: Predicting the Accuracy of Battered Women’s Predictions. J Fam Viol 23, 69–80 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9128-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9128-5

Keywords

Navigation