Very few scales exist that measure violence against women and allow for comparative studies between Mexico and the United States. In this article, we present the results of a validation exercise for just such a scale. The scale was designed using, as a basis, some of the items in the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) and the Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA), in an attempt to differentiate among three types of violence: physical, psychological, and sexual. One hundred and twenty women from diverse social groups in each country responded to a questionnaire in which they were asked to consider the severity of each item on a scale from 1 to 100. Factorial analysis confirms that women assign a different average weight to each type of violence. An analysis of variance test confirms that the different groups of women interviewed evaluated each type of violence in a consistent manner. Very reasonable alpha coefficients were obtained. The paper concludes by demonstrating with an example the use of the scale in prediction modeling.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballard, T. J., Saltzman, L. E., Gazmararian, J. A., Spitz, A. M., Lazorick, S., and Marks, J. S. (1998). Violence during pregnancy; measurement issues. Am. J. Public Health 88(2): 274–276.
Castro, R., Peek-Asa, C., and Ruiz, A. (2003a). Violence against women in Mexico: A study of abuse before and during pregnancy. Am. J. Public Health 93(7): 1110–1116.
Castro, R., Peek-Asa, C., García, L., Ruíz, A., and Kraus, J. (2003b). Risk for abuse against pregnant hispanic women Morelos, Mexico and Los Angeles County, California. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 25(4): 325–332.
Castro, R., and Riquer, F. (2003c). La investigación sobre violencia contra las mujeres en América Latina: entre el empirismo ciego y la teoría sin datos. Cadernos de Saúde Pública (Brasil), 19(1): 135–146.
Dunbar, S. (2001). Violence, domestic violence and immigration. Parity 14(2): 19–20 (Domestic violence and incest resource centre newsletter).
Freyermuth, G., and Fernández, M. (1995). Migration, organization, and identity: The case of women's group from San Cristóbal de las Casas. Signs: J. Women Cult. Soc. 20(4): 970–995.
Gazmararian, J. A., Petersen, R., Spitz, A. M., Goodwin, M. M., Saltzman, L. E., and Marks, J. S. (2000). Violence and reproductive health: Current knowledge and future research directions. Matern. Child Health J. 4(2): 79–84.
Heise, L. (1994). Violencia contra la mujer: la carga oculta sobre la salud. Programa Mujer, Salud y Desarrollo, Washington: OPS.
Hirsch, J. S. (1999). En el norte la mujer manda. Gender, generation, and geography in a Mexican transnational community. Am. Behav. Sci. 42(9): 1332–1349.
Hudson, W., and McIntosh, S. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: two quantifiable dimensions. Journal of Marriage and the Family 43(4): 873–885.
Ilkkaracan, P. (1997). Domestic violence and family life as experienced by Turkish immigrant women in Germany. Women for Women's Human Rights Rep. No. 3.
Marshall, L. L. (1992). Development of the severity of violence against women scales. J. Fam. Violence 7(2): 103–121.
Mattson, S., and Rodriguez, E. (1999). Battering in pregnant Latinas. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 20(4): 405–422.
McFarlane, J., Wiist, W., and Soeken, K. (1999a). Use of counseling by abused pregnant Hispanic women. J. Womens Health Gend. Based Med. 8(4): 541–546.
McFarlane, J., Parker, B., Soeken, K., Silva, C., and Reed, S. (1999b). Severity of abuse before and during pregnancy for African American, Hispanic, and Anglo women. J. Nurs. Midwifery 44(2): 139–144.
McFarlane, J., Wiist, W., and Watson, M. (1998a). Characteristics of sexual abuse against pregnant Hispanic women by their male intimates. J. Womens Health 7(6): 739–745.
McFarlane, J., Wiist, W., and Watson, M. (1998b). Predicting physical abuse against pregnant Hispanic women. Am. J. Prev. Med. 15(2): 134–138.
Morgenstern, H. (1997). Errors of Measurement. Epidemiologic Methods I. In Morgenstern, H. (ed.), UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp. 242–281.
Morse, B. J. (1995). Beyond the Conflict Tactics Scale: Assessing gender differences in partner violence. Violence Vict. 10(4): 251–272.
Natera, G., López, J. L., Tiburcio, M., and Mora, J. (forthcoming). La escala táctica de conflictos en una población de mujeres mexicanas. Análisis de confiabilidad.
Matera, G., Tiburcio, M., and Villatoro, J. (1997). Marital violence and its relationship to excessive drinking in Mexico. Contemp. Drug Probl. 24(Winter): 787–804.
Peek-Asa, C., Garcia, L., McArthur, D., and Castro, R. (2002). Severity of domestic violence indicators as perceived by Mexican and Mexican-American Women. Women Health 35(2/3): 165–180.
Rodenburg, F. A., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1993). The measure of wife abuse: Steps toward the development of a comprehensive assessment technique. J. Fam. Violence 8(3): 203–228.
Subramaniam, V. (1999). The impact of globalization on women's reproductive health and rights: A regional perspective. Development 42(4): 145–149.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence. The Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. J. Marriage Fam. 41: 75–86.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., and Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2). J. Fam. Issues 17(3): 283–316.
Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence Vict. 4(3): 159–177.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors would like to dedicate this manuscript to Agustín Ruíz, who passed away in April, 2004.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castro, R., García, L., Ruíz, A. et al. Developing an Index to Measure Violence Against Women for Comparative Studies Between Mexico and the United States. J Fam Viol 21, 95–104 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-9005-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-9005-z