Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Mg+2 and Cu+2 on the Interaction Between Quinolone and Calf Thymus DNA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Fluorescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mg+2 and Cu+2 have different binding capacities to quinolone drugs and have different binding modes with calf thymus DNA. Using the method of absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy, the influence of Mg+2 and Cu+2 on the binding between calf thymus DNA and each of four quinolone drugs has been studied. The results show that both Mg+2 and Cu+2 can bind with the four drugs. In the absence of divalent metal ions, quinolone drugs interact with DNA double helix by forming hydrogen bonds between the carboxyl and carbonyl groups of the drugs and the phosphate groups of the DNA bases, and the binding capacity shows a close relationship with the drug structures. The two metal ions show different influences on the binding between the drug and DNA, which depends on the type of ion, concentration of the metal ions and the structure of drugs. Mg+2 in lower concentrations (0.01 mM to 3.0 mM) can act as a bridge between the carboxyl group/carbonyl group of the drug and the phosphate group of the DNA by electrostatic interaction, while Cu+2 can act as an intermediary ion between carboxyl group/carbonyl group of the drug and the DNA bases by a co-ordinate bond. Both actions can increase the interaction of the π electron between the condensed rings of the drugs and the DNA bases. In some conditions, Cu+2 can weaken the binding between the drug and the DNA by competitive inhibition if there is a site on the drug that can directly bind both DNA bases and Cu+2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chu DTW, Fernandes PB (1991) In: Testa B (ed.) In Advances in Drug Research, Academic Press, London, vol. 21, pp 42

  2. Reynolds JEF (1993) In Matindale, the extra pharmacopeia, 30th edn. Pharmaceutical, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Son GS, Yeo JA, Kim MS, Kim SK, Holmen A, Akerman B, Norden B (1998) Binding mode of norfloxacin to calf thmus DNA. J Am Chem Soc 120(26):6451–6457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson VE, Gootz TD, Osheroff NJ (1998) Topoisomerase IV catalysis and the mechanism of quinolone action. J Biol Chem 273(28):17879–17885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kampranis SC, Maxwell AJ (1998) The DNA gyrase-quinolone complex: ATP hydrolysis and the mechanism of DNA cleavage. J Biol Chem 273(35):22615–22626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bailly C, Colson P, Houssier C (1998) The orientation of norfloxacin bound to double-stranded DNA. Biomed Biophys Res Commun 243(3):844–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Song GW, He Y, Cai ZX (2004) The interaction between levofloxacine hydrochloride and DNA mediated by Cu2+. J Fluoresc 14(6):705–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shen LL (1989) A reply: do quinolones bind to DNA?- Yes. Biochem Pharmacol 38(12):2042–2044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morrisey I, Hoshino K, Sato K, Yoshida A, Hayakawa Z, Bures MG, Shen LL (1996) Mechanism of differential activities of ofloxacin enantiomers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40(8):1775–1784

    Google Scholar 

  10. Palu G, Valisena S, Ciarrocchi G, Gatto B, Palumbo M (1992) Quinolone binding to DNA is mediated by magnesium ions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(20):9671–9675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Turel I (2002) The interactions of metal ions with quinolones antibacterial agents. Coord Chem Rev 232(1–2):27–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liorente B, Leclerc F, Cedergren R (1996) Using SAR and QSAR analysis to model the activity and structure of the quinolone—DNA complex. Bioorg Med Chem 4(1):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robles J, Martin-polo J, Alvarez-Valtierra L, Hinojosa L, Mendoza-diaz G (2000) A theoretical-experimental study on the structure and activity of certain quinolones and the interaction of their cu(ii)-complexes on a dna model. Metal Based Drugs 7(6):301–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Polk RE (1989) Drug-drug interactions with ciprofloxacin andother fluoroquinolones. Am J Med 87:S76–S81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan XY, Chen L, Qiao JL (1999) Study on the ternary complex of CPFX, copper(II) and DNA by the method of fluorescence. Spectrosc Spectral Anal 19(4):572–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo DS, Yuan XY (1999) The regulation of Mg (II) to the combination of ciprofloxacin and calf thymus DNA. Chem J Chin Univ 20(4):584–586

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo DS, Yuan XY, Wu JB (2007) Influence of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) on the interaction between sparfloxacin and calf thymus DNA. J Inorg Biochem 101(4):644–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Xie MX, Long M, Liu Y, Qin C (2006) Characterization of the interaction between human serum albumin and morin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1760(8):1184–1191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu HJ, Yu JS, Wang SL, Chen HY (2003) Studies on Interactions of Ru(III), Rh(III), Pd(II) with ct-DNA. Chin J Inorg Chem 19(4):355–360

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Efthimiadou EK, Thomadaki H, Sanakis Y, Raptopoulou CP, Katsaros N, Scorilas A, Karaliota A, Psomas G (2007) Structure and biological properties of the copper(II) complex with the quinolone antibacterial drug N-propyl-norfloxacin and 2, 20-bipyridine. J Inorg Biochem 101(1):64–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo Dong-Sheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dong-Sheng, G., Bo-Yu, J. & Xiao-Ying, Y. Influence of Mg+2 and Cu+2 on the Interaction Between Quinolone and Calf Thymus DNA. J Fluoresc 21, 113–118 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-010-0694-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-010-0694-1

Keywords

Navigation