Skip to main content
Log in

Measurements and Simulations of Neutron Emission Versus Deuterium Filling Pressure in Plasma Focus Device PF-24

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of experiments were carried out using the middle energy (dense) plasma focus device PF-24 with deuterium as a working gas under pressure in a range between 2 and 5 mbar for 17 kV of charging voltage. The relationship between these operating deuterium pressures in reference to the total neutron yield (Yn) was estimated. The 5-phase Lee code was used to simulate the measured discharge current and neutron yield (Yn) using a phenomenological beam-target neutron generating mechanism, which was incorporated in the model. Comparison of the Yn versus pressure using fitted model parameters was made at each point of pressure. The good agreement between measured and computed Yn values was achieved for discharges with lower neutron emission. The measured Yn (below 2.6 × 109 n/discharge—the median value) has been reproducible by the model for 73% of simulated discharges, while above the median value its prediction were incorrect. The kinetic plasma parameters which were measured and computed using the Lee code for different pressures are: the time to a current sheath collapse (tc), the average axial current sheath velocity (vz) and the so called velocity factor (RF). Good agreement was found in the whole range of deuterium pressures between the computed and measured results for these kinematic quantities. Presented findings in this work suggest that the character of neutron emission is more complex than it would seem from classical interpretation of neutron production based on a beam-target model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Bernard, H. Bruzzone, P. Choi, H. Chuaqui, V. Gribkov, J. Herrera, K. Hirano, A. Krejci, S. Lee, C. Luo, F. Mezzetti, M. Sadowski, H. Schmidt, K. Ware, C.S. Wong, V. Zoita, J. Moscow Phys. Soc. 8, 93 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Lee, T.Y. Tou, S.P. Moo, M.A. Eissa, A.V. Gholap, K.H. Kwek, S. Mulyodrono, A.J. Smith, W. Suryadi, M.Zakaullah Usada, Am. J. Phys. 56, 62 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. V.A. Gribkov, A. Banaszak, B. Bienkowska, A.V. Dubrovsky, I. Ivanova-Stanik, L. Jakubowski, L. Karpinski, R.A. Miklaszewski, M. Paduch, M.J. Sadowski, M. Scholz, A. Szydlowski, K. Tomaszewski, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40, 3592 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Lee, http://www.plasmafocus.net (2017). Accessed 26 Apr 2018

  5. S. Lee, J. Fusion Energ 33, 4 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. O.A. Anderson, W.R. Baker, S.A. Colgate, H.P. Furth, J. Ise Jr., R.V. Pyle, J. Phys. Rev. 110, 1375 (1958)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Lee, S.H. Saw, L. Soto, S.V. Springham, S.P. Moo, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51, 075006 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S.H. Saw, P. Lee, R.S. Rawat, R. Verma, D. Subedi, R. Khanal, P. Gautam, R. Shrestha, A. Singh, S. Lee, J. Fusion Energ 34, 3 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ł. Marciniak, A. Wójcik-Gargula, A. Kulińska, J. Bielecki, U. Wiącek, Nukleonika 61, 413 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Bieńkowska, R. Prokopowicz, M. Scholz, J. Kaczmarczyk, A. Igielski, L. Karpiński, M. Paduch, K. Pytel, AIP Conf. Proc. 1612, 105 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M.H. Liu, X. Feng, S.V. Springham, S. Lee, I.E.E.E. Trans, Plasma Sci. 26, 2 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Lee, P. Lee, G. Zhang, X. Feng, V.A. Gribkov, M. Liu, A. Serban, T.K.S. Wong, I.E.E.E. Trans, Plasma Sci. 26, 4 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Soto, P. Silva, J. Moreno, G. Silvester, M. Zambra, C. Pavez, L. Altamirano, H. Bruzzone, M. Barbaglia, Y. Sidelnikov, W. Kies, Braz. J. Phys. 34, 4B (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Acuna, F. Castillo, J. J. E. Herrera, A. Postal, in IEEE International Conference Plasma Science IEEE Conference Record—Abstracts (1996), https://doi.org/10.1109/plasma.1996.550281

  15. S. Lee, S.H. Saw, J. Fusion Energ 27, 4 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Lee, S.H. Saw, A.I.P. Appl, Phys. Lett. 92, 2 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sh Al-Hawat, M. Akel, S.H. Saw, S. Lee, J. Fusion Energ 31, 1 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Gautam, R. Khanal, S.H. Saw, S. Lee, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 45, 8 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M. Akel would like to thank Director General of the Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, for encouragement and permanent support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ł. Marciniak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marciniak, Ł., Akel, M., Kulińska, A. et al. Measurements and Simulations of Neutron Emission Versus Deuterium Filling Pressure in Plasma Focus Device PF-24. J Fusion Energ 37, 124–129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-018-0157-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-018-0157-2

Keywords

Navigation