Abstract
Accident analysis of fusion facilities is important part of safety assessment. Validated computer codes are required to perform such analysis. At present ASTEC code is being actively developed by IRSN to include features required for safety analysis of fusion facilities. This paper presents detailed analysis of P1 test performed at ICE test facility using CPA module of ASTEC code. Results of performed analysis confirmed that ASTEC could be successfully applied for analysis of loss of coolant accidents in fusion facilities like ITER or W7-X. Modelling of the pressure suppression system included in ASTEC is adequate as well. Peculiar gas compression effect was observed in the drain tank. This compression effect and gas temperature behaviour could be further investigated to resolve remaining issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. Gulden, S. Ciattaglia, V. Massaut, P. Sardain, Main safety issues at the transition from ITER to fusion power plants. Nucl. Fusion 47, 1391–1398 (2007). doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/9/C01
K. Takase, H. Akimoto, L.N. Topilski, Results of two-phase flow experiments with an integrated Ingress-of-Coolant Event (ICE) test facility for ITER safety. Fusion Eng. Des. 54(3–4), 593–603 (2001)
K. Takase, Y. Ose, H. Akimoto, Numerical prediction of pressure rise characteristics in ITER at ingress of coolant events, in 7th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering ICONE-7, Tokyo, Japan, April 19–23,1999
S. Paci, F. Parozzi, M.T. Porfiri, Validation of the ECART code for the safety analysis of fusion reactors. Fusion Eng. Des. 75–79, 1243–1246 (2005)
T. Marshall, M.T. Porfiri, L. Topilski, B. Merrill, Fusion safety codes: international modeling with MELCOR and ATHENA–INTRA. Fusion Eng. Des. 63–64, 243–249 (2002)
B.J. Merrill, P.W. Humrickhouse, R.L. Moore, A recent version of MELCOR for fusion safety applications. Fusion Eng. Des. 85, 1479–1483 (2010)
T. Kaliatka, E. Uspuras, A. Kaliatka, Modelling of water ingress into vacuum vessel experiments using RELAP5 Code. J. Fusion Energ (2014). doi:10.1007/s10894-014-9790-6
C. Séropian, M. Barrachin, J.P. Van Dorsselaere, D. Vola, Adaptation of the ASTEC code system to accident scenarios in fusion installations. Fusion Eng. Des. 88(9–10), 2698–2703 (2013)
L. Topilski, H. Akimoto, Integrated Ice Facility Testing for Analysis Validation. Final report G 81 TT 08FJ (T504-3). Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (2001)
J.P. Van Dorsselaere et al., The ASTEC integral code for severe accident simulation. Nucl. Technol. 165, 293–307 (2009)
J.P. Van Dorsselaere, D. Perrault, M. Barrachin, A. Bentaib, F. Gensdarmes, W.Haeck, S. Pouvreau, E. Salat, C. Seropian, J. Vendel, Progress of IRSN R&D on ITER safety assessment. J. Fusion Energ. 405–410 (2012)
J. Bestele, W. Klein–Heβling, ASTEC V0 CPA module, containment thermal hydraulics and aerosol and FP behaviour—user guidelines, Rev. 0. GRS report ASTEC–V0/DOC/00–14, September, 2000
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kačegavičius, T., Urbonavičius, E. Modelling of Ingress of Coolant Event into Vacuum Experiments with ASTEC Code. J Fusion Energ 34, 320–325 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-014-9804-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-014-9804-4