Abstract
The design of novel nuclear facilities, fusion as well as fission reactors, requires the knowledge of all properties of relevant materials, including the nuclear differential cross sections for a careful selection. The nuclear cross sections data for gas production via particle (neutron, proton, alpha, etc.) induced reactions are great importance in the domain in the fusion reactor technology, particularly in the calculation of nuclear transmutation rates, nuclear heating and radiation damage due to gas formation. In fusion reactor structures, a serious damage mechanism has been gas production in the metallic resulting from diverse nuclear reactions, mainly through (n, p) and (n, α), (n, d), (n, t). In the present study, by using equilibrium reaction mechanisms, the (n, xα) reaction alpha emission spectra for 27Al, 50,52Cr, 55Mn, 54,56Fe, 58,60Ni isotopes were investigated from 9 to 15 MeV incident neutron energy. The equilibrium results have been calculated by using the hybrid model, the geometry dependent hybrid model. Calculation results have been also compared with the available measurements in literature.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig10_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10894-012-9582-9/MediaObjects/10894_2012_9582_Fig11_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E.E. Bloom, J. Nucl. Mater. 7, 258 (1998)
S. Şahin, M. Übeyli, Energy Conver. Manag. 45, 1497 (2004)
E. Tel, J. Fusion Energ. 29, 332–336 (2010)
E. Tel et al., J. Fusion Energ. 29, 290–294 (2010)
H. Leeb et al., J. Korean Phys. Society 59(2), 1230–1235 (2011)
R. Aymar et al., The ITER design. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 44, 519 (2002)
B. Király et al., Nucl. Instrum. Method Phys. Res. B 266, 549–554 (2008)
Mukherjee, Singh, J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 22, 1455–1467 (1996)
M. Ismail, Pramana 32(5), 605–618 (1989)
E. Tel, Ann. Nucl. Energy 37, 1316–1320 (2010)
J. Ernst, W. Friedland, H. Stockhorst, Z. Phys. A 333, 45 (1989)
E. Gadioli, E. Gadioli Erba, M. Luinetti, Z. Phys. A 321, 107 (1985)
M. Ismail, Pramana J. Phys. 50, 173 (1998)
R.D. Kieburtz, E.F. Neuzil, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 34, 3303 (1972)
P.P. Dmitriev, Energoatomizdat, INDC (CCP)-263/G + CN + SZ IAEA, Austria (1986)
D. West, A.C. Sherwood, Ann. Nucl. Energy 9, 551–577 (1982)
H. Matsunobu, N. Yamamuro, Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2, 188–191 (2002)
Heaton et al., Nucl. Instrum. Method A 276, 529–538 (1989)
Daruga, Matusevich, Atom. Energy 33, 735 (1972)
S. Gerjacks, K. Ehrlich, in Proceedings of International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, 13–17 May 1992, J€ulich, Germany, ed. by S.M. Qaim (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992), p. 259
M. Blann, H.K. Vonach, Global test of modified precompound decay models. Phys. Rev. C 28, 1475–1496 (1983)
M. Blann, ALICE-91: Statistical Model Code System with Fission Competition, RSIC Code Package PSR-146
V.M. Strutinsky, in Proceedings of International Congress Physics Nuclear Application (Paris, 1958) p. 617
V.F. Weisskopf, D.H. Ewing, Phys. Rev. 30, 472 (1940)
M. Blann, Hybrid model for pre-equilibrium decay in nuclear reactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 337 (1971)
M. Blann, Influence of nucleon mean-free paths on intranuclear cascade results. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 757 (1972)
M. Blann, H.K. Vonach, Global test of modified precompound decay models. Phys. Rev. C28, 1475 (1983)
M. Blann, ALICE-91: Statistical Model Code System with Fission Competition, RSIC Code Package PSR-146
EXFOR/CSISRS (Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data File). Brookhaven National Laboratory, National Nuclear Data Center (2010), http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/exfor/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tel, E., Gokce, A.A., Ugur, F.A. et al. Alpha Emission Spectra of 27Al, 50,52Cr, 55Mn, 54,56Fe, 58,60Ni Nucleus for Neutron Induced Reaction. J Fusion Energ 32, 389–394 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-012-9582-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-012-9582-9