Why Compact Tori for Fusion?
- 98 Downloads
A compact torus (CT) has a toroidal magnetic and plasma geometry, but is contained within a simply-connected vacuum vessel such as a cylinder. Spheromaks and field-reversed configurations fall into this category. Compact tori are translatable and have a high engineering beta. The primary benefit of CTs for fusion is the absence of toroidal field and Ohmic Heating coils and the many problems brought on by them. Studying fusion-relevant plasma in simply-connected geometries affords the world fusion program both physics and technology opportunities not found in other configurations. This paper outlines the technology and physics opportunities of compact tori, and presents a cost model based on geometry for comparison with less compact configurations.
KeywordsCompact tori Spheromak Field reversed configuration
- 1.FESAC TAP report David Hill (Chair), Rich Hazeltine (Vice Chair) http://fusion.gat.com/tap/final_report.php/
- 2.BPO ReNeW report Rich Hazeltine (Chair). David Hill (Vice Chair) http://burningplasma.org/web/renew.html
- 3.E.B. Hooper et al., ‘The Compact Torus: Spheromaks and FRCs’ white paper in preparation for this JournalGoogle Scholar
- 4.J. Sheffield, Private communication with corresponding author, June 2009Google Scholar
- 5.F. Najmabadi, Private communication with corresponding author August 2009Google Scholar
- 6.R. Stambaugh, ‘Overview of the Fusion Development Facility’ presentation given at the 2–4 March ‘Harnessing Fusion Power’ workshop, UCLA available at http://www.fusion.ucla.edu/FNST/Renew_Presentations/
- 7.R.A. Krakowski, ‘Simplified Fusion Power Plant Costing: A General Prognosis and Call for “New Think”’ Fusion Technology, March 1995, Volume 27Google Scholar
- 8.P.M. Bellan, Phys. Plasmas 9, 3050 (2002)Google Scholar
- 10.W.M. Nevins, A review of confinement requirements for advanced fuels. J. Fusion Energ. 17(1), (1998)Google Scholar