Skip to main content
Log in

Carbon-14 Source Terms and Generation in Fusion Power Cores

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A consecutive study of the source terms of 14C as the major contributor to the external costs of fusion and its production rate was performed by system and neutron activation analysis. It shows that the specific 14C activity induced in the low activation structural materials, coolants and breeders suggested for future fusion power reactor cores is significantly dependent upon the assumption for nitrogen content. The determined range of the specific 14C activity ∼2–20 TBq/GW(e)a induced by the near-term water-cooled, gas-cooled and advanced liquid lithium and lithium–lead self-cooled fusion power reactors is given in the paper regarding the values for natural 14C background and artificial 14C sources as fission power reactors and nuclear tests. It is definitely recommended to minimize the nitrogen content below 0.01 wt.% in the beryllium multipliers and in the structural materials, SiC/SiC composite including. Then due to environmental and waste disposal reasons the 14C generation in fusion power blankets will have negligible impact on the cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.P. Holdren, Chair, D.H. Berwald, R.J. Budnitz, J.G. Crocker, J.G. Delene, R.D. Endicott, M.S. Kazimi, R.A. Krakowski, B.G. Logan, K.R. Schultz, Report of the Senior Committee on Environmental, Safety, and Economic Aspects of Magnetic Fusion Energy, UCRL-53766, LLNL, University of California, September 1989

  2. G. Borrelli, I. Cook, T. Hamacher, K. Lackner, P. Lako, R. Saez, G.C. Tosato, D.J. Ward, Socio-economic Research on Fusion, Summary of EU Research 1997–2000, EFDA-RE-RE-1, 20 July 2001

  3. S. Konishi, K. Okano, K. Tokimatsu, K. Ito, Y. Ogawa, Socio-economic study of fusion energy at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute. Fusion Eng. Des. 69(1–4), 523–529 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. International Atomic Energy Agency, Management of Waste Containing Tritium and Carbon-14, IAEA-TECDOC-421, Vienna, 2004

  5. A.D. Sakharov, Radioactive carbon from nuclear explosions and nonthreshold biological effects. Sov. J. Atomic Energy 4(6), 576–580 (1958). In English See: Science & Global Security, 1990, vol 1, pp. 175–187

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.A. Forrest, The European Activation System: EASY-2003, Overview, Issue 1. EASY Documentation Series, UKAEA Fus 484, EURATOM/UKAEA Fusion Association, December 2002

  7. K. Okano, et al., Compact reversed shear tokamak reactor with a superheated steam cycle. Nucl. Fusion 40(3), 635–646 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. G.E. Shatalov, et al., Russian DEMO-S reactor with continuous plasma burn. Fusion Eng. Des. 51–52, 289–298 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Steiner, L. El-Guebaly, et al., ARIES-RS safety design and analysis. Fusion Eng. Des. 38, 189–218 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A.R. Raffery, L. El-Guebaly, et al., High performance blanket for ARIES-AT power plant. Fusion Eng. Des. 58–59, 549–553 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Maisonnier, et al., The European power plant conceptual study. Fusion Eng. Des. 75–79, 1173–1179 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Nishio, S. Ueda, R. Kurihara, T. Kuroda, et al., Prototype Tokamak fusion power reactor based on SiC/SiC composite material focusing on easy maintenance. Fusion Eng. Des. 48, 271–279 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Generation IV Roadmap, R&D Scope Report for Liquid-Metal-Cooled Reactor Systems, Issued by the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee and the Generation IV International Forum, GIF-005-00, December 2002

  14. E.O. Adamov, A.I. Filin, V.V. Orlov, Nuclear power development on the basis of new nuclear reactor and fuel cycle concepts, Proceedings of The International Conference on Innovative Technologies for Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Nuclear Power, IAEA-CSP-24, IAEA, Vienna, 2004

  15. R.J. Kurtz, Q. Huang, Y. Katoh, B.A. Pint, A.F. Rowcliffe, G.E. Youngblood, Materials and fabrication issues for LiPb based test blanket modules, Report at the IEA/Liquid Breeder Blanket Workshop, St. Petersburg, Russia, 7–9 June 2006

  16. T. Noda, M. Fujita, H. Araki, A. Kohyama, Impurities and evaluation of induced activity of CVI SiCf/SiC composites. Fusion Eng. Des. 51–52, 99–103 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Ampornrat, C.B. Bahn, G.S. Was, Corrosion and stress corrosion cracking of ferritic-martensitic alloys in supercritical water, 12th international conference on environmental degradation of materials in nuclear system—water reactors, Salt Lake City, UT, August 2005

  18. J. Wallenius, S. Pillon, N-15 Requirement for 2nd stratum ADS nitride fuels, Proceedings of the AccApp/ADTTA 2001 Meeting, American Nuclear Society, Reno, 11–15 November 2001

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to UKAEA and to Dr R. A. Forrest personally for the possibility to use EASY-2003 in the neutron induced activation calculations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. I. Khripunov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khripunov, V.I., Kurbatov, D.K. & Subbotin, M.L. Carbon-14 Source Terms and Generation in Fusion Power Cores. J Fusion Energ 27, 241–249 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-008-9145-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-008-9145-2

Keywords

Navigation