Advertisement

The Journal of Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 143–157 | Cite as

No Last Resort: Pitting the Right to Die Against the Right to Medical Self-Determination

  • Michael Cholbi
Article

Abstract

Many participants in debates about the morality of assisted dying maintain that individuals may only turn to assisted dying as a ‘last resort’, i.e., that a patient ought to be eligible for assisted dying only after she has exhausted certain treatment or care options. Here I argue that this last resort condition is unjustified, that it is in fact wrong to require patients to exhaust a prescribed slate of treatment or care options before being eligible for assisted dying. The last resort condition effectively pits one right of patients, their right to refuse medical treatment or interventions, against another patient right acknowledged by advocates of assisted dying, the right to die. Drawing on an analogy with the legal notion of an unconstitutional condition, I argue that the last resort condition unjustly demands that an arguably more fundamental right—the right to refuse medical treatment or intervention—be foregone in order to acquire a less fundamental right—the right to die. I then address three rationales for the last resort condition and find that they subject individuals to arbitrarily stringent standards for exercising the right to die, standards to which those who seek to end their lives by voluntarily ending life-sustaining treatments are not subject. Subjecting those who seek assisted dying to the last resort condition therefore wrongfully infringes on their right to refuse medical treatment or interventions.

Keywords

Assisted dying Patient rights Self-determination Right to die 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Audiences at the 2014 annual meeting of the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics and at the International Conference on End of Life Law, Ethics, Policy, and Practice at the University of Queensland, Australia (August 2014) provided valuable feedback on this manuscript. I also wish to especially thank my colleague David Adams for drawing my attention to the legal literature on unconstitutional conditions.

References

  1. Beauchamp, Tom. 1995. Intending death. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  2. Brock, Daniel W. 2004. Physician-assisted suicide as a last- resort option at the end of life. In Physician-assisted dying: The case for palliative care and patient choice, ed. Timothy E. Quill, and Margaret Pabst Battin, 130–149. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brody, Howard. 1992. Assisted death: A compassionate response to a medical failure. New England Journal of Medicine 327: 1384–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, Courtney S. 2007. E-mail statement to ProCon.org. Quoted at http://euthanasia.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001320, Accessed 9 Sept 2014.
  5. Cholbi, Michael. 2013. The terminal, the futile, and the psychiatrically disordered. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 36: 498–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cholbi, Michael. 2011. Suicide: The philosophical dimensions. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, Carl H., and Alan R. Fleischman. 1996. Guidelines for physician-assisted suicide: Can the challenge be met? Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 24: 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dworkin, Ronald, et al. 1997. Assisted suicide: the philosophers’ brief. New York Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1997/mar/27/assisted-suicide-the-philosophers-brief/, Accessed 18 June 2014.
  9. Dworkin, Gerald, R.G. Frey, and Sissela Bok. 1998. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (For and against). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gomez, C.F. 1991. Regulating death: Euthanasia and the case of the Netherlands. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hendin, Herbert. 1998. Seduced by death: Doctors, patients, and assisted Suicide. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Keown, John (ed.). 1997. Euthanasia examined: Ethical, clinical, and legal perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Keown, John. 2002. Euthanasia, ethics, and public policy: An argument against legalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, Franklin G., and Robert D. Truog. 2012. Death, dying, and organ transplantation: Reconstructing medical ethics at the end of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Moreno, Jonathan (ed.). 1995. Arguing euthanasia. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  16. Pereira, J. 2011. Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: The illusion of safeguards and controls. Current Oncology 18: 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Quill, T.E., C.K. Cassel, and D.E. Meier. 1992. Care of the hopelessly ill: Proposed clinical criteria for physician-assisted suicide. New England Journal of Medicine 327: 1380–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Quill, Timothy E. 2008. Physician-assisted death in the United States: Are the existing “last resorts” enough? Hastings Center Report 38: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Quill, Timothy E., and Margaret Pabst Battin (eds.). 2004. Physician-assisted dying: The case for palliative care and patient choice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schneiderman, Lawrence, Nancy S. Jecker, and Albert R. Jonsen. 1990. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Annals of Internal Medicine 112: 949–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, Wesley J. 2012. Oregon assisted suicide not “last resort.” National Review Online, 12 July 2012. http://www.nationalreview.com/human-exceptionalism/328089/oregon-assisted-suicide-not-last-resort, Accessed 26 Feb 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State Polytechnic University, PomonaPomonaUSA

Personalised recommendations