Abstract
This paper explores some of the problems which arise from Immanuel Kant’s commitment to both human rights and the rights of states. Michael Doyle believed it was contradictory for Kant to defend both human rights and non-intervention by states in the affairs of other states, but I argue that for Kant there was no such contradiction, and I explore Kant’s claim that the state is “a moral personality.” I also discuss Kant’s belief that “Nature guarantees” that perpetual peace will obtain, and I consider Kant as a teleologist.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkins, B.T. Kant on International Relations. J Ethics 11, 147–159 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-7986-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-7986-8