Skip to main content

Ethics and Intuitions

Abstract

For millennia, philosophers have speculated about the origins of ethics. Recent research in evolutionary psychology and the neurosciences has shed light on that question. But this research also has normative significance. A standard way of arguing against a normative ethical theory is to show that in some circumstances the theory leads to judgments that are contrary to our common moral intuitions. If, however, these moral intuitions are the biological residue of our evolutionary history, it is not clear why we should regard them as having any normative force. Research in the neurosciences should therefore lead us to reconsider the role of intuitions in normative ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singer, P. Ethics and Intuitions. J Ethics 9, 331–352 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-3508-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-005-3508-y

Key words

  • brain imaging
  • David Hume
  • ethics
  • evolutionary psychology
  • Henry Sidgwick
  • Immanuel Kant
  • intuitions
  • James Rachels
  • John Rawls
  • Jonathan Haidt
  • Joshua D. Greene
  • neuroscience
  • trolley problem
  • utilitarianism