Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Properties of the MgO–Y2O3 and MgO–Gd2O3 Ceramic Composites Obtained by the Method of Hot Compaction

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics Aims and scope

Data are presented for comparison of the optical, mechanical, and thermophysical properties of the MgO–Y2O3 and MgO–Gd2O3 ceramic composites consolidated through the hot compaction of the corresponding nanopowders obtained from the glycine-nitrate precursors by the method of self-propagating high-temperature synthesis. It is shown that the MgO–Y2O3 ceramics having a lower density, a higher thermal conductivity, and a larger microhardness, as compared to those of the MgO–Gd2O3 ceramics, is the material of choice for the infrared shielding windows transparent for the radiation with a wavelength falling within the range 3–5 μm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Harris, L. Cambrea, L. Johnson, R. T. Seaver, M. Baronowski, R. Gentilman, N. C. Scott, T. Gattuso, S. Silberstein, P. Rogan, T. Hartnett, B. Zelinski, W. Sunne, E. Fest, W. H. Poisl, C. B. Willingham, G. Turri, C. Warren, M. Bass, D. E. Zelmon, and S. M. Goodrich, Properties of an infrared-transparent MgO:Y2O3 Nanocomposite, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 96, No. 12, 3828–3835 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. J. Ma, W. K. Jung, C. Baek, and D. K. Kim, Influence of microstructure control on optical and mechanical properties of infrared transparent Y2O3–MgO nanocomposite, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 37, No. 15, 4902–4911 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N. A. Safronova, O. S. Kryzhanovska, M. V. Dobrotvorska, A. E. Balabanov, A. V. Tolmachev, R. P. Yavetskiy, S. V. Parkhomenko, R. Ye. Brodskii, V. N. Baumer, D. Yu. Kosyanov, O. O. Shichalin, E. K. Papynov, and J. Lie, Influence of sintering temperature on structural and optical properties of Y2O3–MgO composite SPS ceramics, Ceram. Int., 46, No. 5, 6537–6543 (2020).

  4. D. T. Jiang and A. K. Mukherjee, Spark plasma sintering of an infrared-transparent Y2O3–MgO nanocomposite, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 93, No. 3, 769–773 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Wu, X. Li, J.-G. Li, Q. Zhu, and X. Sun, Fabrication of Gd2O3–MgO nanocomposite optical ceramics with varied crystallographic modifications of Gd2O3 constituent, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 101, No. 11, 4887–4891 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. M. Yong, D. H. Choi, K. Lee, S. Y. Ko, and D. I. Cheong, Influence of the calcination temperature on the optical and mechanical properties of Y2O3–MgO nanocomposites, Arch. Metall. Mater., 63, No. 3, 1481–1484 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Liu, K. Morita, T. S. Suzuki, and B. N. Kim, Synthesis of highly-infrared transparent Y2O3–MgO nanocomposites by colloidal technique and SPS, Ceram. Int., 46, No. 9, 13669–13676 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Liu, K. Morita, T. S. Suzuki, and B. N. Kim, Evolution of microstructure, mechanical, and optical properties of Y2O3–MgO nanocomposites fabricated by high pressure spark plasma sintering, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 40, No. 13, 4547–4555 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. A. Permin, S. S. Balabanov, A. V. Novikova, I. L. Snetkov, O. V. Palashov, A. A. Sorokin, and M. G. Ivanov, Fabrication of Yb-doped Lu2O–Y2O3–La2O3 solid solutions transparent ceramics by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis and vacuum sintering, Ceram. Int., 45, No. 1, 522–529 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. A. Permin, S. V. Kurashkin, A. V. Novikova, A. P. Savikin, E. M. Gavrishchuk, S. S. Balabanov, and N. M. Khamaletdinova, Synthesis and luminescence properties of Yb doped Y2O3, Sc2O3 and Lu2O3 solid solutions nanopowders, Opt. Mater., 77, 240–245 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Ladenkov.

Additional information

Translated from Inzhenerno-Fizicheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 95, No. 6, pp. 1624–1632, November–December, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Permin, D.A., Belyaev, A.V., Koshkin, V.A. et al. Comparison of the Properties of the MgO–Y2O3 and MgO–Gd2O3 Ceramic Composites Obtained by the Method of Hot Compaction. J Eng Phys Thermophy 95, 1595–1603 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-022-02628-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-022-02628-2

Keywords

Navigation