Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Go to cart
  1. Home
  2. The Journal of Economic Inequality
  3. Article
The COVID-19 resilience of a continental welfare regime - nowcasting the distributional impact of the crisis
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Distributional effects of macroeconomic shocks in real-time

20 September 2021

Kerstin Bruckmeier, Andreas Peichl, … Timo Wollmershäuser

The impact of COVID-19 on households´ income in the EU

01 June 2021

Vanda Almeida, Salvador Barrios, … Wouter van der Wielen

Growth, inequality and poverty dynamics in Mexico

04 December 2018

Alberto Javier Iniguez-Montiel & Takashi Kurosaki

Estimating the Impact of Covid-19 and Policy Responses on Australian Income Distribution Using Incomplete Data

26 October 2021

Jinjing Li, Yogi Vidyattama, … Denisa M. Sologon

Gone with the Crisis? Welfare State Change in Europe Before and Since the 2008 Crisis

13 February 2020

Luis Buendía, Pedro José Gómez Serrano & Ricardo Molero-Simarro

Changes in household income during COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis

01 October 2022

Giorgio Di Pietro

Living with Reduced Income: An Analysis of Household Financial Vulnerability Under COVID-19

08 October 2021

Catarina Midões & Mateo Seré

Socio-Economic Impacts of COVID-19 on Household Consumption and Poverty

23 July 2020

Amory Martin, Maryia Markhvida, … Brian Walsh

Effects of fiscal consolidation on income inequality: narrative evidence from South America

22 July 2022

Dante de Souza Cardoso & Laura Barbosa de Carvalho

Download PDF
  • Open Access
  • Published: 22 February 2022

The COVID-19 resilience of a continental welfare regime - nowcasting the distributional impact of the crisis

  • Denisa M. Sologon  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-59521,
  • Cathal O’Donoghue2,
  • Iryna Kyzyma1,
  • Jinjing Li3,
  • Jules Linden1 &
  • …
  • Raymond Wagener4 

The Journal of Economic Inequality volume 20, pages 777–809 (2022)Cite this article

  • 482 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

We evaluate the COVID-19 resilience of a Continental welfare regime by nowcasting the implications of the shock and its associated policy responses on the distribution of household incomes over the whole of 2020. Our approach relies on a dynamic microsimulation modelling that combines a household income generation model estimated on the latest EU-SILC wave with novel nowcasting techniques to calibrate the simulations using external macro controls which reflect the macroeconomic climate during the crisis. We focus on Luxembourg, a country that introduced minor tweaks to the existing tax-benefit system, which has a strong social insurance focus that gave certainty during the crisis. We find the system was well-equipped ahead of the crisis to cushion household incomes against job losses. The income-support policy changes were effective in cushioning household incomes and mitigating an increase in income inequality, allowing average household disposable income and inequality levels to bounce back to pre-crisis levels in the last quarter of 2020. The share of labour incomes dropped, but was compensated by an increase in benefits, reflecting the cushioning effect of the transfer system. Overall market incomes dropped and became more unequal. Their disequalizing evolution was matched by an increase in redistribution, driven by an increase in the generosity of benefits and larger access to benefits. The nowcasting model is a “near” real-time analysis and decision support tool to monitor the recovery, scalable to other countries with high applicability for policymakers.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Data Availability Statement

The analysis conducted in this study is based on EU-SILC data standardized to be used with the EUROMOMD tax-benefit microsimulation model. The data cannot be shared. Access to the data can be obtained by submitting a request to EUROSTAT.

References

  • Agresti, A.: Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley (2010)

  • Almeida, V., Barrios, S., Christl, M., Poli, S. D., Tumino, A., van der Wielen, W.: The impact of COVID-19 on households’ income in the EU. The Journal of Economic Inequality (2021)

  • Bargain, O.: Back to the future: decomposition analysis of distributive policies using behavioural simulations. Int. Tax Public Financ. 19(5), 708–731 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargain, O., Callan, T.: Analysing the effects of tax-benefit reforms on income distribution: a decomposition approach. J. Econ. Inequal. 8(1), 1–21 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, K., Doorley, K., Regan, M., Roantree, B., Tuda, D.: The Potential Costs and Distributional Effect of Covid-19 Related Unemployment in Ireland. Budget Perspectives 2021 Paper 1. The Economic & Social Research Institute, Dublin (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biewen, M., Jenkins, S. P.: A framework for the decomposition of poverty differences with an application to poverty differences between countries. Empir. Econ. 30(2), 331–358 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M., Gurgand, M.: Fast development with a stable income distribution: taiwan, 1979–94. Rev. Income Wealth 47(2), 139–163 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F. H., Leite, P. G.: Beyond Oaxaca-Blinder: accounting for differences in household income distributions. Journal of Economic Inequality 6, 117–148 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., Gardiner, L.: The initial impact of covid-19 and policy responses on household incomes. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 36(S1), S187–S199 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., Tasseva, I.: Did the uk policy response to covid-19 protect household incomes? J. Econ. Inequal. 19 (2021)

  • Bronka, P., Collado, D., Richiardi, M. G.: The covid-19 crisis response helps the poor: the distributional and budgetary consequences of the uk lock-down. Technical report (2020)

  • Bruckmeier, K., Peichl, A., Popp, M., Wiemers, J., Wollmershäuser, T.: Distributional effects of macroeconomic shocks in real-time. J. Econ. Inequal. 19, 459–487 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burzynski, M., Machado, J., Aalto, A., Beine, M., Haas, T., Kemp, F., Magni, S., Mombaerts, L., Picard, P., Proverbio, D., Skupin, A., Docquier, F.: Covid-19 Crisis Management in Luxembourg: Insights from an Epidemionomic Approach WorkingPaper 2020-08. LISER, Luxembourg (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Canto, O., Figari, F., Fiorio, C. V., Kuypers, S., Marchal, S., Romaguera-de-la Cruz, M., Tasseva, I. V., Verbist, G.: Welfare resilience at the onset of the covid-19 pandemic in a selection of european countries: Impact on public finance and household incomes. Review of Income and Wealth, n/a(n/a) (2021)

  • Cerniauskas, N., Sologon, D., O’Donoghue, C., Tarasonis, L.: Income inequality and redistribution in lithuania: the role of policy, labour market, income and demographics. Review of Income and Wealth (2021)

  • Chetty, R., Friedman, J., Hendren, N., Machal, S.: How Did Covid-19 and Stabilization Policies Affect Spending and Employment? a New Real-Time Economic Tracker Based on Private Sector Data. NBER Working Paper No 27431. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, C., Doorley, K., Roantree, B., O’Toole, C.: The effect of the covid-19 pandemic on consumption and indirect taxes in ireland. Budget Perspectives 2021 (2020)

  • DiNardo, J., Fortin, N. M., Lemieux, T.: Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973-1992: a semiparametric approach. Econometrica 64(5), 1001–1044 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingel, J., Neiman, B.: How Many Jobs Can Be Done at Home? Technical Report, NBER Working Paper No 26948. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolls, M., Fuest, C., Peichl, A.: Automatic stabilizers and economic crisis: Us vs. Europe. J. Public Econ. 96, 279–294 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolls, M., Fuest, C., Peichl, A., Wittneben, C.: Fiscal Consolidation and Automatic Stabilization: New Results. EconPol Working Paper 39, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich (2020)

  • Eichenbaum, M. S., Rebelo, S., Trabandt, M.: The Macroeconomics of Epidemics. Technical Report, NBER Working Paper No 26882. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G.: The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROMOD: Euromod country report, Luxembourg 2017-2020. Technical report (2020)

  • Ferrera, M.: The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social europe. J. Eur. Soc. Policy 6(1), 17–37 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figari, F., Fiorio, C. V.: Welfare Resilience in the Immediate Aftermath of the Covid-19 Outbreak in Italy EUROMOD Working Paper No 06/20. The Institute for Social and Economic Research, Essex (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T., Angrist, N., Cameron-Blake, E., Hallas, L., Kira, B., Majumdar, S., Petherick, A., Philipps, T., Tatlow, H., Webster, S.: Variation in Government Responses to Covid-19. Technical Report, BSG-WP-2020/032, Version 8 (October 2020). Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, Oxford (2020)

  • Jenkins, S., Brandolini, A., Micklewright, J., Nolan, B., Basso, G.: The Great Recession and the Distribution of Household Income., Chapter The Great 2 and Its Consequences for Household Incomes in 21 Countries. Pages 33–89. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N.: Measurement of tax progressivity: an international comparison. Econ. J. 87(345), 71–80 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, P. J.: The Distribution and Redistribution of Income Pages 200–226. Macmillan Education, UK (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R. I., Yitzhaki, S.: Income inequality effects by income. Rev. Econ. Stat. 67(1), 151–156 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H., Lietz, C., Sutherland, H.: Swapping policies: Alternative tax-benefit strategies to support children in Austria, Spain and the UK. J. Soc. Policy 36(4), 625–647 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., O’Donoghue, C.: Evaluating binary alignment methods in microsimulation models. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 17(1), 15 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Vidyattama, Y., La, H., Miranti, R., Sologon, D.: The impact of covid-19 and policy reponses on autralian income distribution. unpublished manuscript (2020)

  • Navicke, J., Rastrigina, O., Sutherland, H.: Nowcasting indicators of poverty risk in the european union: a microsimulation approach. Soc. Indic. Res. 119, 101–119 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, C., Loughrey, J.: Nowcasting in microsimulation models: a methodological survey. J. Artif.Soc. Soc. Simul. 17(4) (2014)

  • O’Donoghue, C., Solognon, D. M., Kyzyma, I., McHale, J.: Modelling the distributional impact of the covid-19 crisis. Fisc. Stud. 41(2), 321–336 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, C., Sologon, D.: Evaluating microsimulation based methods to nowcast household income survey data. In: Online Expert meeting on nowcasting and mid-term projections through microsimulation models (2021)

  • Paulus, A., Tasseva, I. V.: Europe through the crisis: Discretionary policy changes and automatic stabilizers. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 82(4), 864–888 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, M., Figari, F., Sutherland, H., Tumino, A.: Welfare compensation for unemployment in the great recession. Rev. Income Wealth 60(suppl.), S177–S204 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sologon, D. M., Van Kerm, P., Li, J., O’donoghue, C.: Accounting for differences in income inequality across countries: tax-benefit policy, labour market structure, returns and demographics. J. Econ. Inequal. 19, 13–43 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, H., Figari, F.: EUROMOD: the European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model. Int. J. Microsimul. 6(1) (2013)

  • Van Kerm, P.: Generalized measures of wage differentials. Empir. Econ. 45(1), 465–482 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is part of the project Modelling the macroeconomic and distributional effects of COVID-19 and restarting scenarios supported by the National Research Fund, Luxembourg (grant COVID-19/2020-2/14854549/MODVid). We would like to acknowledge the data support of Johann Neumayr, Marco Schockmel, Mehran Kafaï, Paul Reiff, Véronique Sinner and Jérôme Hury at Statec, and Joel Machado and Kristell Leduc at LISER. The results use EUROMOD version I2.0+, which is maintained, developed and managed by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, in collaboration with EUROSTAT and national teams from the EU countries. The results and their interpretation are our responsibility. We are grateful for comments from Frédéric Docquier, Karina Doorley, from participants of the Research Colloquium at Trier University, the IMA Conference on ”Microsimulation modelling of policy responses to COVID-19”, the joint LISER-NUIG-IMA Microsimulation and Inequality Seminar and the ISER Online Expert meeting on nowcasting and mid-term projections through microsimulation models. The data that support the findings of this study are available from EUROSTAT, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of EUROSTAT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER), Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

    Denisa M. Sologon, Iryna Kyzyma & Jules Linden

  2. National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland

    Cathal O’Donoghue

  3. University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia

    Jinjing Li

  4. IGSS, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    Raymond Wagener

Authors
  1. Denisa M. Sologon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cathal O’Donoghue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Iryna Kyzyma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinjing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jules Linden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Raymond Wagener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denisa M. Sologon.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests Statement

The authors of this research certify that they have no conflict of interests in the work discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 1.37 MB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sologon, D.M., O’Donoghue, C., Kyzyma, I. et al. The COVID-19 resilience of a continental welfare regime - nowcasting the distributional impact of the crisis. J Econ Inequal 20, 777–809 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-021-09524-4

Download citation

  • Received: 11 December 2020

  • Accepted: 10 December 2021

  • Published: 22 February 2022

  • Issue Date: December 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-021-09524-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Nowcasting
  • Microsimulation
  • Income inequality
  • Tax-benefit policy
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • How we use cookies
  • Your privacy choices/Manage cookies
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.