Advertisement

The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 565–590 | Cite as

Distributional effects of gambling taxes: empirical evidence from Italy

  • Luca Gandullia
  • Lucia LeporattiEmail author
Article

Abstract

Deep changes have taken place in the regulation of Italy’s gambling market during the last decade, making it by far the largest in Europe. Tax revenues from the gambling sector raised by the State have grown sharply, reaching more than € 10 billion, corresponding to more than 2% of total tax revenues. Concurrently with these developments, concerns have arisen over the distributional effects of taxes applied to gambling, given that it is internationally recognized that poorer individuals are more attracted to gambling. At present very little is known in Italy about the economic effects of gambling taxes and about their potential regressivity also in comparison with other sin taxes. The aim of this study is to increase our understanding of the incidence of these taxes, comparing the results with those obtained for a selection of other sin and consumption goods. After thoroughly investigating the gambling taxation scheme applied in Italy, we exploit two-part models to study the relationship between gambling tax paid by households and their socio-economic status, measured, alternatively, in terms of income and expenditure. The analysis shows that gambling taxes are highly regressive and opens important questions on possible reforms of the current system. Despite its focus on the Italian context, the analysis offers new insights also for those European countries that in last years have been involved in a process of progressive deregulation of the gambling sector.

Keywords

Gambling taxes Regressivity Tax incidence Two-part model 

JEL Classification

H22 C50 D12 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. AAMS - Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, 2017. “Organizzazione, attività e statistica.” Available at: www.agenziadoganemonopoli.gov.it. Accessed 15 March 2019
  2. Atkinson A.B., Rainwater, L., Smeeding T.M.: Income Distribution in the OECD Countries: 379 The Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study, Social Policy Studies, 18, OECD, Paris, 380 France (1995)Google Scholar
  3. Angrist, J.D., Pischke, J.S.: Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumol, W.J.: On taxation and the control of externalities. The American Economic Review. 62(3), 307–322 (1972)Google Scholar
  5. Beckert, J., Lutter, M.: The inequality of fair play: lottery gambling and social stratification in Germany. European sociological review. 25(4), 475–488 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belotti, F., Deb, P., Manning, W.G., Norton, E.C.: Twopm: Two-part models. The Stata Journal. 15(1), 3–20 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borg, M.O., Mason, P.M., Shapiro, S.L.: An economic comparison of gambling behavior in Atlantic City and Las Vegas. Public Finance Quarterly. 18(3), 291–312 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borg, M.O., Mason, P.M., Shapiro, S.L.: The incidence of taxes on casino gambling: Exploiting the tired and poor. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 50(3), 323–333 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewer, M., O'Dea, C.: Measuring living standards with income and consumption: evidence from the UK. No. 2012–05. ISER Working Paper Series, 2012. Available at: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/iser/2012-05.pdf
  10. Clotfelter, C.T.:Gambling taxes. In: Cnossen S., Theory and practice of excise Taxation: Smoking, drinking, gambling, polluting, and driving, 84–119 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clotfelter, C.T., Cook, P.J.: Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Harvard University Press (1991)Google Scholar
  12. Combs, K.L., Jaebeom, K., Spry, J.A.: The relative regressivity of seven lottery games. Applied Economics. 40(1), 35–39 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawford, I., Keen, M., Smith, S., Value added tax and excises, in J. Mirrlees, S. Adam, T. Besley, R. Blundell, S. Bond, R. Chote, M. Gammie, P. Johnson, G. Myles and J. Poterba (eds), Dimensions of Tax Design: the Mirrlees Review. Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar
  14. Decoster, A., Loughrey, J., O'Donoghue, C., Verwerft, D.: How regressive are indirect taxes? A microsimulation analysis for five European countries. Journal of Policy analysis and Management. 29(2), 326–350 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donatiello, G., D'Orazio, M., Frattarola, D., Rizzi, A., Scanu, M., Spaziani, M.: Statistical matching of income and consumption expenditures. International Journal of Economic Sciences. 3(3), 50 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. Duan, N., Manning, W.G., Morris, C.N., Newhouse, J.P.: A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care (Corr: V2 P413). Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 1, 115–126 (1983)Google Scholar
  17. European Commission: Taxation trends in the European Union, Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018Google Scholar
  18. Forrest, D.: Gambling policy in the European Union: Too many losers? FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis. 64(4), 540–569 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galizzi, M.M.: Label, nudge or tax? A review of health policies for risky behaviours. Journal of public health research. 1(1), 14 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gandullia, L., Leporatti, L. The demand for gambling in Italian regions and its distributional consequences. Papers in Regional Science,  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12302 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garvía, R., Guillén M.F.: Socioeconomic determinants of syndicate play. Carlos III University of Madrid: Manuscript, (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Giuricin, A.:La tassazione del settore dei giochi, Special Report, Istituto Bruno Leoni (2013)Google Scholar
  23. H2 Gambling Capital: Benchmark of gambling taxation and license fees in eight European member states (2013)Google Scholar
  24. Hansen, A.: The tax incidence of the Colorado state lottery instant game. Public Finance Quarterly. 23(3), 385–398 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heckman, J.: Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica. 47, 153–161 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herrnstein, R.J., Loewenstein, G.F., Prelec, D., Vaughan Jr., W.: Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice. Journal of behavioral decision making. 6(3), 149–185 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IFS: Quantitative analysis of VAT rate structures, in IFS et al., A retrospective evaluation of elements in the EU VAT system, Report prepared for the European Commission (2011)Google Scholar
  28. Jackson, R.: Demand for lottery products in Massachusetts. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 28(2), 313–325 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kakwani, N.: Measurement of tax progressivity: An international comparison. The Economic Journal. 87, 71–80 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kitchen, H., Powells, S.: Lottery expenditures in Canada: A regional analysis of determinants and incidence. Applied Economics. 23(12), 1845–1852 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leahy, E., Lyons, S., Tol, R.S.: The distributional effects of value added tax in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review. 42(2), 213 (2011)Google Scholar
  32. Lockwood, B.B., Taubinsky, D.: Regressive Sin Taxes, NBER Working Paper 23085, Cambridge, MA, March 2017Google Scholar
  33. Lorenzi, P.: Sin taxes. Society. 41(3), 59–65 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mikesell, J.L.: A note on the changing incidence of state lottery finance. Social Science Quarterly 70.2, 513 (1989)Google Scholar
  35. OECD: The Distributional Effects of Consumption Taxes in OECD Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris. Available at:  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264224520-en, (2014)
  36. O'Donoghue, T., Rabin, M.: Optimal sin taxes. Journal of Public Economics. 90(10), 1825–1849 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O'Donoghue, C., Baldini, M., Mantovani, D.: Modelling the redistributive impact of indirect taxes in Europe: an application of EUROMOD. No. EM7/01. EUROMOD Working Paper, (2004)Google Scholar
  38. Oster, E.: Are all lotteries regressive? Evidence from the Powerball. National Tax Journal. 179–187 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pigou, A.C.:The economics of welfare. Palgrave Macmillan (2013)Google Scholar
  40. Pogue, T.F., Sgontz, L.G.: Taxing to control social costs: the case of alcohol. The American Economic Review. 79(1), 235–243 (1989)Google Scholar
  41. Price, D.I., Novak, E.S.: The tax incidence of three Texas lottery games: Regressivity, race, and education. National Tax Journal. 741–751 (1999)Google Scholar
  42. Reynolds, M., Smolensky E.: Public expenditure, taxes and the distribution of income: The United States. 1950, 1961, 1970. Academic Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  43. Ruiz, N., Trannoy, A.: Le caractère régressif des taxes indirectes: les enseignements d'un modèle de microsimulation. Economie et statistique. 413(1), 21–46 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sarti, S., Triventi, M.: Il gioco d’azzardo: l’iniquità di una tassa volontaria: la relazione tra posizione socio-economica e propensione al gioco. Stato e mercato. 33(96), 503–534 (2012)Google Scholar
  45. Sawkins, J.W., Dickie, V.A.: National lottery participation and expenditure: preliminary results using a two stage modelling approach. Applied Economics Letters. 9(12), 769–773 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scott, F., Garen, J.: Probability of purchase, amount of purchase, and the demographic incidence of the lottery tax. Journal of Public Economics. 54(1), 121–143 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scudiero, L.: Quando il fisco dipende dal gioco. Special Report, Istituto Bruno Leoni (2014)Google Scholar
  48. Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.P.: Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (2010)Google Scholar
  49. Stranahan, H.A., Borg, M.O.: Separating the decisions of lottery expenditures and participation: a truncated tobit approach. Public Finance Review. 26(2), 99–117 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Suits, D.B., et al.: National Tax Journal. 30, 19–35 (1977)Google Scholar
  51. Tan, A.K.G., Yen, S.T., Nayga Jr., R.M.: Socio-demographic determinants of gambling participation and expenditures: evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 34(3), 316–325 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker, D.M., Barnett, A.H.: The social costs of gambling: An economic perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies. 15(3), 181–212 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Welte, J.W., Barnes, G.M., Wieczorek, W.F., Tidwell, M.C.O., Parker, J.C.: Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive behaviors. 29(2), 323–335 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Worthington, A., Brown, K., Crawford, M., Pickernell, D.: Socio-Economic and Demographic Determinants of Household Gambling in Australia (Vol. 156). School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political SciencesUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations