Advertisement

The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 1–23 | Cite as

Inequality, ethnic diversity, and redistribution

  • Christian Houle
Article

Abstract

Seminal political economy models from Meltzer and Richard, among others, theorize that, in democracies, more inequality should lead to more redistribution. Most country-level empirical studies find weak support for this prediction. This paper makes two contributions to this debate. First, I identify some of the key shortcomings of previous tests and provide a new empirical analysis that corrects for these limitations. Using a dataset covering 89 developed and developing democracies, I find that inequality is associated with more redistribution. Second, I show that inequality’s effect on redistribution is weaker in democracies in which the poor – defined as the people with income below the median – are divided along ethnic lines than in those in which they are ethnically unified. Taken together, these results suggest that although economic inequality increases redistribution, the magnitude of the relationship is conditional on how inequality interacts with other social cleavages, such as ethnicity.

Keywords

Redistribution Economic inequality Ethnic diversity Median voter theorem 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10888_2016_9340_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (694 kb)
(PDF 694 KB)

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.: Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Rodrik, D.: Redistributive politics and economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 109(2), 465–90 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Glaeser, E.: Fighting poverty in the U.S. and europe: a world of difference. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B.: Why doesn’t the US have a European style welfare state? Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 1933 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, A., Brandolini, A.: Promise and pitfalls in the use of secondary data-sets: income inequality in OECD countries as a case study. J. Econ. Lit. 39(3), 771–799 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin, K., Huber, J.: Economic versus cultural differences: forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104(04), 644–662 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassett, W., Burkett, J., Putterman, L.: Income distribution, government transfers, and the problem of unequal influence. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 15, 207–228 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bénabou, R., Ok, E.: Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. Q. J. Econ. 116(2), 447–487 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blundell, R., Bond, S.: Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econ. 87, 115–143 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boix, C.: Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boix, C., Miller, M., Rosato, S.: A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comp. Pol. Stud. 46(12), 1523–1554 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bratton, M. Poor people and democratic citizenship in Africa. In: Krishna, A. (Ed) Poverty, participation and democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  13. Cheibub, J.: Presidentialism and Democratic Performance. In Reynolds, A. (Ed.) The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy, Pp.104–140. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  14. Cheibub, J., Gandhi, J., Vreeland, J.: Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice 143(1-2), 67–101 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Mello, L., Tiongson, E.: Income inequality and redistributive government spending. Public Finan. Rev. 34, 282–305 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desmet, K., Weber, S., Ortuno-Ortín, I.: Linguistic diversity and redistribution. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 7(6), 1291–1318 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dionne, K., Inman, K., Montinola, G.: Another resource curse? The impact of remittances on political participation. Afrobarometer Working Paper no. 145 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. Engels, F.: The Condition of the Working Class in England. Panther Edition, New York (1969[1887])Google Scholar
  19. Feld, L., Schnellenbach, J.: Political institutions and income (re-)distribution: evidence from developed economies. Public Choice 159, 435–455 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fowler, J., Kam, C.: Beyond the self: social identity, altruism, and political participation. J. Polit. 69(3), 813–27 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gang, I., Rivera-Batiz, F., Yun, M. -S.: Economic strain, ethnic concentration and attitudes towards foreigners in the European Union. Institute for the Study of Labor Bonn (2002)Google Scholar
  22. Georgiadis, A., Manning, A.: Spend it like Beckham? inequality and redistribution in the UK, 1983–2004. Public Choice 151, 537–563 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilens, M.: Why Americans Hate Welfare Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glaeser, E., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J., Soutter, C.: Measuring trust. Q. J. Econ. 115(3), 811–846 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gordon, M.: ”Assimilation in American Life. Oxford University Press, New York (1964)Google Scholar
  26. Hanson, J., Sigman, R.: Leviathan’s latent dimensions: measuring state capacity for comparative political research. Unpublished Manuscript: University of Michigan and Syracuse University (2013)Google Scholar
  27. Houle, C.: Ethnic inequality and the dismantling of democracy: a global analysis. World Polit. 67(3), 469–505 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iversen, T., Soskice, D.: An asset theory of social policy preferences. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 95(4), 875–893 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. Iversen, T., Soskice, D.: Distribution and redistribution: the shadow of the nineteenth century. World Polit. 61(3), 438–486 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenkins, S.P.: Accounting for inequality trends: decomposition analyses for the UK, 1971–86. Economica 62(245), 29–63 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jenkins, S.P.: INEQDECO: Stata Module to calculate inequality indices with decomposition by subgroup. Boston College Statistical Software Component Archive, Boston. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s366002.html (2008)
  32. Jenkins, S.P.: World income inequality databases: an assessment of WIID and SWIID. J. Econ. Inequal. 13(4), 629–71 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kenworthy, L., Pontusson, J.: Rising inequality and the politics of redistribution in affluent countries. Perspect. Polit. 3(3), 449–72 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Larcinese, V.: Voting over redistribution and the size of the welfare state: the role of turnout. Pol. Stud. 55(3), 1–18 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Le Grand, J.: The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services. Allen and Unwin, London (1982)Google Scholar
  36. Lind, J.T.: Why there is so little redistribution? Nordic J. Polit. Econ. 31, 111–25 (2005)Google Scholar
  37. Lind, J.T.: Fractionalization and the size of government. J. Public Econ. 91(1–2), 51–76 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindert, P.: What limits social spending? Explor. Econ. Hist. 33, 1–34 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lindert, P.: Growing Public. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindert, K., Skoufias, E., Shapiro, J.: Redistributing income to the poor and the rich: public transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean. Social Protection Discussion Paper no. 0605 Social Safety Nets Primer Series (2006)Google Scholar
  41. Lindqvist, E., Östling, R.: Identity and redistribution. Public Choice 155 (3–4), 469–491 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lipset, S.M.: ”Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1960)Google Scholar
  43. Lupu, N., Pontusson, J.: The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 105(2), 316–336 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luttmer, E.: Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. J. Polit. Econ. 109 (3), 500–28 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mahler, V.: Electoral turnout and income redistribution by the state. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 47, 161–183 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mahler, V., Jesuit, D., Paradowski, P.: Electoral turnout and state redistribution: a cross-national study of fourteen developed countries. Polit. Res. Q. 67(2), 361–373 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marx, K., Engels, F.: Selected Correspondence. Progress Publishers, Moscow (1975[1870])Google Scholar
  48. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–44 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meltzer, A., Richard, S.: A rational theory of the size of government. J. Polit. Econ. 89(5), 914–927 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milanovic, B.: The median-voter hypothesis, income inequality, and income redistribution: an empirical test with the required data. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 16, 367–410 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moene, K.O., Wallerstein, M.: Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 95(4), 859–874 (2001)Google Scholar
  52. Moene, K.O., Wallerstein, M.: Earnings inequality and welfare spending: a disaggregated analysis. World Polit. 55(4), 485–516 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morgan, J., Kelly, N.: Market inequality and redistribution in Latin America and the Caribbean. J. Polit. 75(3), 672–685 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nickell, S.: Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6), 1417–1426 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Østby, G.: Polarization, horizontal inequalities and violent civil conflict. J. Peace Res. 45(2), 143162 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pettigrew, T.: Intergroup contact theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49(1), 65–85 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perotti, R.: Growth, income distribution, and democracy: what the data say. J. Econ. Growth 1, 149–187 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Persson, T., Tabellini, G.: The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA (2003)Google Scholar
  59. Pontusson, J., Rueda, D.: The politics of inequality: voter mobilization and left parties in advanced industrial states. Comp. Pol. Stud. 43(6), 675–705 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Posner, D.: The political salience of cultural difference: why Chewas and Tumbukas are allies in Zambia and adversaries in Malawi. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 4, 529–545 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prasad, N.: Policies for redistribution: the use of taxes and social transfers. Discussion Paper International Institute for Labor Studies Geneva (2008)Google Scholar
  62. Reed, W.: On the practice of lagging variables to avoid simultaneity. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 77(6), 897–905 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Roberts, K.: Voting over income tax schedules. J. Public Econ. 8(3), 329–40 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Romer, T.: Individual welfare, majority voting, and the properties of a linear income tax. J. Public Econ. 4(2), 163–85 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ross, E.: The Principles of Sociology. Century, New York (1920)Google Scholar
  66. Ross, M.: Is democracy good for the poor? Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50(4), 860–74 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sanderson, S.: Ethnic heterogeneity and public spending: Testing the evolutionary theory of ethnicity with cross-national data, 47-87. In: Salter, F (ed.) ”Welfare, Ethnicity, and Altruism: New findings and Evolutionary Theory, Frank Cass, London (2004)Google Scholar
  68. Scervini, F.: Empirics of the median voter: democracy, redistribution and the role of the middle class. J. Econ. Inequal. 10, 529–550 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scheve, K., Stasavage, D.: Religion and preferences for social insurance. Q. J. Polit. Sci. 1(3), 255–286 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schwabish, J., Smeeding, T., Osberg, L.: Income distribution and social expenditures: a cross-national perspective. Luxembourg Income Study Working paper 350 (2003)Google Scholar
  71. Segura-Ubiergo, A.: The Political Economy of the Welfare State in Latin America: Globalization, Democracy, and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shelton, C.: The size and composition of government expenditure. J. Public Econ. 91, 2230–2260 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Solt, F.: Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database. Soc. Sci. Q. 90 (2), 231–242 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Solt, F.: Standardized World Income Inequality Database. Soc. Sci. Q. (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  75. Soroka, S., Banting, K., Johnston, R.: Immigration and redistribution in a global era, 261-288. In: Bardhan, P., Bowles, S., Wallerstein, M. (eds.) Globalization and Egalitarian Redistribution. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)Google Scholar
  76. Stichnoth, H.: Does immigration weaken natives’ support for the unemployed? evidence from Germany. Public Choice 151(3–4), 631–54 (2011)Google Scholar
  77. Stichnoth, H., Van der Straeten, K.: Ethnic diversity, public spending, and individual support for the welfare state: a review of the empirical literature. J. Econ. Surv. 27(2), 364–89 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Truman, D.: The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. Alfred A. Knopf, New York (1951)Google Scholar
  79. Vanhanen, T.: An exploratory comparative study of the relationship between heterogeneity and welfare politics, 88-118. In: Salter, F (ed.) Welfare, Ethnicity, and Altruism: New findings and Evolutionary Theory. Frank Cass, London (2004)Google Scholar
  80. von Hippel, P.: How to impute interactions, squares, and other transformed variables. Sociol. Methodol. 39(1), 265–91 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wimmer, A., Cederman, L. -E., Min, B.: Ethnic power relations dataset. http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/11796x (2009)
  82. Wittenberg, M.: Problems with SWIID: the case of South Africa. J. Econ. Inequal. 13(4), 673–77 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political ScienceMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations