Skip to main content

Reference parameters in Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition: Pooled-sample versus intercept-shift approaches

Abstract

The Blinder-Oaxaca (BO) decomposition explains two groups’ difference (e.g., in wage between males and females) with regressors. The BO decomposition depends on the chosen counterfactual reference parameter representing no “discrimination”. One popular way to choose the reference parameter is simply using the pooled sample, and another way is allowing different intercepts in the pooled sample. This paper points out two problems in the latter. First, the reference slopes are a matrix-weighted average of the two group slopes where the weights depend only on the variances of the two groups, not on the levels; the levels may represent the competing “forces” to primarily influence the reference parameter, but the role of the variances should be secondary at best. Second, the reference intercept is arbitrary: the same BO decomposition holds with vastly different reference intercepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Blinder, A.S.: Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J. Hum. Resour. 8, 436–455 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Caliendo, M., Lee, W.S.: Fat chance! Obesity and the transition from unemployment to employment. Econ. Hum. Biol. 11, 121–133 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cervellati, M., Sunde, W.: Life expectancy and economic growth: the role of the demographic transition. J. Econ. Growth 16, 99–133 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cobb-Clark, D.A., Tan, M.: Noncognitive skills, occupational attainment, and relative wages. Labour Econ. 18, 1–13 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cotton, J.: On the decomposition of wage differentials. Rev. Econ. Stat. 70, 236–243 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Elder, T.E., Goddeeris, J.H., Haider, S.J.: Unexplained gaps and Oaxaca–Blinder decompositions. Labour Econ. 17, 284–290 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fortin, N.M.: The gender wage gap among young adults in the United States: the importance of money versus people. J. Human Res. 43, 886–920 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fortin, N.M., Lemieux, T., Firpo, S.: Decomposition methods in economics. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics IV-A, pp 1–102. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Grove, W.A., Hussey, A., Jetter, M.: The gender pay gap beyond human capital: heterogeneity in noncognitive skills and in labor market tastes. J. Human Res. 46, 827–874 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Imbens, G.W., Wooldridge, J.M.: Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econ. Lit. 47, 5–86 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lee, M.J.: Micro-econometrics for policy, program, and treatment effects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2005)

  12. 12.

    Lee, M.J.: Treatment effects in sample selection models and their nonparametric estimation. J. Econ. Lit. 167, 317–329 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Magnani, E., Zhu, R.: Gender wage differentials among rural–urban migrants in China. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 42, 779–793 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mora, R.: A nonparametric decomposition of the Mexican American average wage gap. J. Appl. Econ. 23, 463–485 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Neumark, D.: Employers’ discriminatory behavior and the estimation of wage discrimination. J. Hum. Resour. 23, 279–295 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Oaxaca, R.: Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int. Econ. Rev. 14, 693–709 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Oaxaca, R.L., Ransom, M.R.: On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials. J. Econ. 61, 5–21 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Reimers, C.W.: Labor market discrimination against Hispanic and black men. Rev. Econ. Stat. 65, 570–579 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Trejo, S.J.: Why do Mexican Americans earn low wages. J. Polit. Econ. 105, 1235–1268 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Trejo, S.J.: Intergenerational progress of Mexican-origin workers in the U.S. labor market. J. Hum. Resour. 38, 467–489 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Verdugo, R.R.: Earnings differentials between black, Mexican American, and non-Hispanic white male workers: on the cost of being a minority worker. Soc. Sci. Q. 73, 663–673 (1972–1987)

  22. 22.

    Yount, K.: Gender, resources across the life course, and cognitive functioning in Egypt. Demography 45, 907–926 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myoung-Jae Lee.

Additional information

The author is grateful to the comments by the Editor and two anonymous reviewers. The author is also grateful to Mathias Sinning for directing the author’s attention to the issues addressed in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, MJ. Reference parameters in Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition: Pooled-sample versus intercept-shift approaches. J Econ Inequal 13, 69–82 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-014-9293-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition
  • Reference parameter
  • Wage gap