Skip to main content

The measurement of unemployment using completed durations: evidence on the gender gap in unemployment in France

Abstract

This paper examines how unemployment can be measured in a normative fashion - taking into account the mean and inequality of spell lengths - and how the extent of unemployment can be estimated from cross section data of the type found in labour force surveys. The issue is not straightforward since in these surveys completed durations of unemployed individuals are not observed yet they constitute the basis for calculating the kind of index that has been proposed to measure the extent of unemployment in a way that goes beyond the unemployment rate. The index proposed by Shorrocks has robust normative foundations and has an equivalent representation in terms of average complete duration and the density of completed durations. Building upon earlier work applied in the United States for estimating the average completed duration, we present a method that enables the index to be calculated based on an estimate of the density of completed durations. The approach is illustrated in the context of comparing male-female unemployment differences in France, where historically female unemployment has been higher than that of males.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Aaberge, R., Wennem, T.O.: Non-stationary inflow and duration of unemployment. Discussion paper-Central Bureau of Statistics Oslo (1990)

  2. 2.

    Akerlof, G.A., Main, B.G.M.: Unemployment spells and unemployment experience. Am. Econ. Rev. 70(5), 885–893 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Akerlof, G.A., Main, B.G.M.: An experience-weighted measure of employment and unemployment durations. Am. Econ. Rev. 71(5), 1003–1011 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory, 244–263 (1970)

  5. 5.

    Azmat, G., Güell, M., Manning, A.: Gender gaps in unemployment rates in OECD countries. J. Labor Econ. 24(1), 1–38 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Baker, G.M., Trivedi, P.K.: Estimation of unemployment duration from grouped data: a comparative study. J. Labor Econ. 3(2), 153–174 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Baker, M.: Unemployment duration: compositional effects and cyclical variability. Am. Econ. Rev. 82(1), 313–321 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bishop, J.A., Chow, K.V., Zheng, B.: Statistical inference and decomposable poverty measures. Bull. Econ. Res. 47(4), 0307–3378 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Borooah, V.K.: A duration-sensitive measure of the unemployment rate: theory and application. Labour 16(3), 453–468 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Camarda, C.G., Eilers, P.H.C., Campe, J.: Modelling general patterns of digit preference. Stat. Model. Soc. 8(4), 485–401 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cowell, F.: Measuring Inequality, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Disney, R.: Recurrent spells and the concentration of unemployment in Great Britain. Econ. J. 89, 109–119 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Foster, J., Greer, J., Thorbecke, E.: A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52, 761–776 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Guell, M., Hu, L.: Estimating the probability of leaving unemployment using uncompleted spells from repeated cross-section data. J. Econ. 133(1), 307–341 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kaitz, H.: Analyzing the length of spells of unemployment. Mon. Labor Rev. 15, 11–20 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lambert, P.: Unemployment duration and the measurement of unemployment. J. Econ. Inequal. 7, 273–294 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nickell, S.J.: Estimating the probability of leaving unemployment. Econometrica 47(5), 1249–1266 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Paul, S.: An illfare approach to the measurement of unemployment. Appl. Econ. 24, 739–743 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Riese, M., Brunner, K.: Measuring the severity of unemployment. J. Econ. 67(2), 167–180 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Salant, S.W.: Search theory and duration data: a theory of sorts. Q. J. Econ. 91(1), 39–57 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sen, A.: Poverty: an ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica 44(2), 219–231 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sengupta, M.: Unemployment duration and the measurement of unemployment. J. Econ. Inequal. 7, 273–294 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Shorrocks, A.: On the measurement of unemployment. J. Econ. Inequal. 7, 311–327 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Shorrocks, A.: Spell incidence, spell duration and the measurement of unemployment. J. Econ. Inequal. 7, 295–310 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sider, H.: Unemployment duration and incidence: 1968–82. Am. Econ. Rev. 15(3), 461–472 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Bazen.

Additional information

We are grateful to the Editor, two anonymous referees, Benoît Tarroux and participants at the Journées Louis-André Gerard-Varet (LAGV), Marseille for helpful comments. We also thank Carlo .G. Camarda for his programme for modelling digit preference bias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bazen, S., Joutard, X. & Niang, M.M. The measurement of unemployment using completed durations: evidence on the gender gap in unemployment in France. J Econ Inequal 12, 517–534 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-013-9267-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Unemployment measurement
  • Completed duration
  • Synthetic cohort
  • Gender gap

JEL Classifications

  • J64
  • C41
  • D63