The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 221–237 | Cite as

On the welfare loss caused by inequality of opportunity

Article

Abstract

Based on the ethical principle of equality of opportunity, this paper presents a measure of the welfare loss that is caused by an unfair distribution of a particular outcome (income, health, education, etc). The key idea is that a fair society should produce outcomes that depend on individuals’ effort and not on their external circumstances such as gender, socioeconomic background, etc. We propose measuring inequality of opportunity as the welfare loss attributed to the outcome differences among individuals who exert a similar level of effort. Our results are in line with those aspects of fairness literature that give priority to the ex post compensation approach to equality of opportunity. Finally, we present an empirical application for the measurement of the welfare loss in the income distribution in Europe. We have observed a high degree of heterogeneity among European countries. The welfare loss due to inequality of opportunity ranges in those, from basically zero to almost one fifth of their potential welfare.

Keywords

Equality of opportunity Income distribution Ex post compensation Welfare loss 

JEL Classification

D31 D63 J71 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aaberge, R., Mogstad, M., Peragine, V.: Measuring long-term inequality of opportunity. J. Public Econ. 95, 193–204 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antecol, H.: An examination of cross-country differences in the gender gap in labor force participation rates. Labour Econ. 7, 409–426 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Algan, Y., Cahuc, P.: Civic virtue and labor market institutions. Am. Econ. J.: Macroeconomics 1, 111–145 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arneson, R.J.: Equality of opportunity for welfare. Philos. Stud. 56, 77–93 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Björklund, A., Jäntti, M., Roemer, J.E.: Equality of opportunity and the distribution of long-run income in Sweden. Social Choice Welf. 39, 675–696 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bossert, W.: Redistribution mechanisms based on individual characteristics. Math. Soc. Sci. 29, 1–17 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F.H.G., Menéndez, M.: Inequality of opportunity in Brazil. Rev. Income Wealth 53, 585–618 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Checchi, D., Peragine, V.: Inequality of opportunity in Italy. J. Econ. Inequal. 8, 429–450 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Checchi, D., Peragine, V., Serlenga, L.: Fair and unfair income inequalities in Europe. Ecineq WP 2010–174 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, G.A.: On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99, 906–944 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fernández, R., Fogli, A.: Culture: an empirical investigation of beliefs, work, and fertility. Am. Econ. J.: Macroeconomics 1, 146–177 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferreira, F.H.G., Gignoux, J.: The measurement of inequality of opportunity: theory and an application to Latin America. Rev. Income Wealth 57, 622–657 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fleurbaey, M.: On fair compensation. Theory Decis. 36, 277–307 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fleurbaey, M.: Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fleurbaey, M., Maniquet, F.: A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleurbaey, M., Peragine, V.: Ex ante versus ex post equality of opportunity. Economica 80, 118–130 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fuchs, V.: A note on sex segregation in professional occupations. Explor. Econ. Res. 31, 105–111 (1975)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., Trannoy, A.: Equality of opportunity and luck: Definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France. J. Public Econ. 93, 1189–1207 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marrero, G., Rodriguez, J.G.: Inequality of opportunity in Europe. Rev. Income Wealth 58, 597–621 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mora, R., Ruiz-Castillo, J.: Additively decomposable segregation indexes. The case of gender segregation by occupations and human capital levels in Spain. J. Econ. Inequal. 1, 147–149 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mora, R., Ruiz-Castillo, J.: Gender segregation from birth to occupation. Working Paper 00–63, Economic Series 24, Universidad Carlos III (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peragine, V.: Ranking income distributions according to equality of opportunity. J. Econ. Inequal. 2, 11–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peragine, V., Serlenga, L.: Higher education and equality of opportunity in Italy. Res. Econ. Inequal. 16, 1–31 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pistolesi, N.: Inequality of opportunity in the land of opportunities, 1968–2001. J. Econ. Inequal. 7, 411–433 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ramos, X., Van de Gaer, D.: Empirical approaches to inequality of opportunity: principles, measures and evidence. CORE Discussion Paper 2012/26 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roemer, J.E.: A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos. Public Aff. 22, 146–166 (1993)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roemer, J.E.: Equality of Opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roemer, J.E., Aaberge, R., Colombino, U., Fritzell, J., Jenkins, S.P., Lefranc, A., Marx, I., Page, M., Pommer, E., Ruiz-Castillo, J., San Segundo, M.J., Tranaes, T., Trannoy, A., Wagner, G.G., Zubiri, I.: To what extent do fiscal regimes equalize opportunities for income acquisition among citizens? J. Public Econ. 87, 539–565 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sen, A.: On Economic Inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shorrocks, A.F.: Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica 52, 1369–1388 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Theil, H.: Economics and Information Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1967)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Theil, H., Finizza, A.J.: A note on the measurement of racial integration of schools by means of information concepts. J. Math. Sociol. 1, 187–194 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Villar, A.: On the welfare measurement of income and opportunity. Contrib. Theor. Econ. 5, 1 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dpto. de Análisis Económico y Admon. de EmpresasUniversity of A CoruñaA CoruñaSpain
  2. 2.University Pablo de OlavideSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations