The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 473–493 | Cite as

Conditional occupational segregation of minorities in the US

Article

Abstract

We analyze the role of the demographic and human capital characteristics of minorities in the US in explaining their high occupational segregation with respect to whites and the extent to which they are locked into low-paying jobs. We measure conditional segregation based on an estimated counterfactual distribution in which minorities are given the relevant characteristics of whites. Our results show that the different levels of attained education by ethnicity and race explain a substantial share of occupational segregation among non-whites in the US, while English skills or immigration status are especially relevant for explaining segregation among Hispanics and Asians.

Keywords

Conditional occupational segregation Immigration Race and ethnicity United States 

JEL Classification

D63 J15 J16 J71 J82 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10888_2012_9229_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (108 kb)
(PDF 108 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Albelda, R.: Occupational segregation by race and gender, 1958–1981. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 39(3), 404–411 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alonso-Villar, O., Del Río, C.: Local versus overall segregation measures. Mat. Soc. Sci. 60(1), 30–38 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alonso-Villar, O., Del Río, C., Gradín, C.: The extent of occupational segregation in the US: differences by race, ethnicity, and gender. Ind. Relat. 51(2), 179–212 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aslund, O., Skans, O.N.: How to measure segregation conditional on the distribution of covariates. J. Popul. Econ. 22, 971–981 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica 55(4), 749–764 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bayer, P., McMillan, R., Rueben, K.S.: What drives racial segregation? New evidence using Census microdata. J. Urban Econ. 56, 514–535 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caliendo, M., Kopeinig, S.: Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J. Econ. Surv. 22(1), 31–72 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cancian, M., Reed, D.: Family structure, childbearing, and parental employment: implications for the level and trend in poverty. In: Cancian, M., Danziger, S. (eds.) Changing Poverty, Changing Policies, pp. 92–121. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carrington, W.J., Troske, K.R.: On measuring segregation in samples with small units. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 15(4), 402–409 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carrington, W.J., Troske, K.R.: Interfirm segregation and the black/white wage gap. J. Labor Econ. 16(2), 231–260 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chakravarty, S., Silber, J.: A generalized index of employment segregation. Mat. Soc. Sci. 53(2), 185–195 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chakravarty, S., D’Ambrosio, C., Silber, J.: Generalized Gini occupational segregation indices. Res. Econ. Inequal. 17, 71–95 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chantreuil, F., Trannoy, A.: Inequality decomposition values: the trade-off between marginality and efficiency. J. Econ. Inequal. (2011). doi:10.1007/s10888-011-9207-y Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chiswick, B.R., Miller, P.W.: Educational mismatch: are high-skilled immigrants really working at high-skilled jobs and the price they pay if they aren’t? In: Chiswick, B.R. (ed.) High Skilled Immigration in a Globalized Labor Market, pp. 111–154. American Enterprise Institute, Washington D.C. (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Del Río, C., Alonso-Villar, O.: Occupational segregation measures: a role for status. Res. Econ. Inequal. 20, 37–62 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    DiNardo, J., Fortin, N.M., Lemieux, T.: Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: a semiparametric approach. Econometrica 64, 1001–1044 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duclos, J-Y., Makdissi, P.: Restricted and unrestricted dominance for welfare, inequality, and poverty orderings. J. Public Econ. Theory 6(1), 145–164, 02 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duncan, O.D., Duncan, B.: A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 20(2), 210–217 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Foster, J.E., Shorrocks, A.F.: Poverty orderings. Econometrica 56(1), 173–177 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foster-Bey, J.A. Jr: Did spatial mismatch affect male labor force participation during the 1990s expansion? In: Mincy, R.B. (ed.) Black Males Left Behind, pp. 121–146. The Urban Institute Press (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frankel, D.M., Volij, O.: Measuring school segregation. J. Econ. Theory 146(1), 1–38 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gradín, C.: Race and income distribution: evidence from the US, Brazil and South Africa. Rev. Dev. Econ. (2012, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanushek, E.A., Rivkin, S.G.: School Quality and the Black-White Achievement Gap. Working Paper 12651, National Bureau of Economic Research (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hellerstein, J.K., Neumark, D.: Workplace segregation in the United States: race, ethnicity, and skill. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90(3), 459–477 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holzer, J.H., Raphael, S., Stoll, M.A.: How do employer perceptions of crime and incarceration affect the employment prospect of less-educated young black men? In: Mincy, R.B. (ed.) Black Males Left Behind, pp. 67–85. The Urban Institute Press (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hutchens, R.M.: Segregation curves, Lorenz curves, and inequality in the distribution of people across occupations. Mat. Soc. Sci. 21, 31–51 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hutchens, R.M.: One measure of segregation. Int. Econ. Rev. 45(2), 555–578 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hutchens, R.M.: Measuring Segregation When Hierarchy Matters. Working Paper, ILR, Cornell University (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hutchens, R.M.: Occupational segregation with economic disadvantage: an investigation of decomposable indexes. Res. Econ. Inequal. 17, 99–120 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hutchens, R.M.: A response to Paul Jargowsky’s comments. Res. Econ. Inequal. 17, 125–127 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jahn, J., Schmid, C.F., Schrag, C.: The measurement of ecological segregation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 12(3), 293–303 (1947)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jargowsky, P.A.: Comment on Hutchens’ ‘occupational segregation with economic disadvantage: an investigation of decomposable indexes’. Res. Econ. Inequal. 17, 121–124 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kalter, F.: Measuring Segregation and Controlling for Independent Variables. MZES Working Paper 19, Mannheim (2000)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Karmel, T., MacLachlan, M.: Occupational sex segregation-increasing or decreasing? Econ. Rec. 64(3), 187–195 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    King, M.C.: Occupational segregation by race and sex, 1940–88. Mon. Labor Rev. 115, 30–37 (1992)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lemieux, T.: Decomposing wage distributions: a unified approach. Can. J. Econ. 35, 646–88 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Massey, D.S.: Effects of socioeconomic factors on the residential segregation of Blacks and Spanish Americans in US Urbanized Areas. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44(6), 1015–1022 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McLanahan, S.: Single mothers, fragile families. In: Edwards, J., Crain, M., Kalleberg, A.L. (eds.) Ending Poverty in America, pp. 77–87. The New Press (2007)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maxwell, N.L.: English language and low-skilled jobs: the structure of employment. Ind. Relat. 49(3), 457–465 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mora, R., Ruíz-Castillo, J.: The Statistical Properties of the Mutual Information Index of Multigroup Segregation. Working Paper 09-84, Economic Series (48), Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Queneau, H.: Trends in occupational segregation by race and ethnicity in the USA: evidence from detailed data. Appl. Econ. Lett. 16, 1347–1350 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rawlston, V., Spriggs, W.E.: A logit decomposition analysis of occupational segregation: an update for the 1990s of Spriggs and Williams. Rev. Black Polit. Econ. 29(4), 91–96 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reardon, S.F., Firebaugh, G.: Measures of multigroup segregation. Sociol. Method. 32, 33–76 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Reardon, S.F.: Measures of ordinal segregation. Res. Econ. Inequal. 17, 129–155 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sastre, M., Trannoy, A.: Shapley inequality decomposition by factor components: some methodological issues. J. Econ. 9, 51–89 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sethi, R., Somanatham, S.: Racial inequality and segregation measures: some evidence from the 2000 census. Rev. Black Polit. Econ. 36(2), 79–91 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shorrocks, A.: Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the Shapley value. J. Econ. Inequal. (2012). doi:10.1007/s10888-011-9214-z Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sianesi, B.: An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labour market programmes in the 1990s. Rev. Econ. Stat. 86(1), 133–155 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Silber, J.: Occupational segregation indices in the multidimensional case: a note. Econ. Rec. 68, 276–277 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Spriggs, W.E., Williams, R.M.: A Logit decomposition analysis of occupational segregation: results for the 1970s and 1980s. Rev. Econ. Stat. 78, 348–355 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Zimmer, C., Stainback, K., Robinson, C., Taylor, T., McTague, T.: Documenting desegregation: segregation in American workplaces by race, ethnicity, and sex, 1966–2003. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71, 565–588 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Economía AplicadaUniversidade de VigoVigoSpain

Personalised recommendations