The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 239–265 | Cite as

Tracking poverty with coarse data: evidence from South Africa



Household surveys often contain coarse data, which consist of a mixture of missing values, interval-censored values and point (fully-observed) values, making it difficult to construct a continuous money-metric measure of wellbeing. This paper assesses the sensitivity of poverty and inequality estimates to the multiple imputation of coarse earnings data and reported zero values using the 2001–2006 South African Labour Force Surveys. Estimates of poverty amongst the employed are shown not to be sensitive to multiple imputation of missing and interval-censored data, but are sensitive to the treatment of workers reporting zero earnings. Poverty trends are generally robust to the choice of method, and a significant decline in poverty is evident. Inequality estimates, on the other hand, appear more sensitive to the treatment of zero values and the choice of imputation methods, and, overall, no particular trends in inequality could be discerned.


Coarse data Earnings distribution Multiple imputation Poverty Working poor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abdelkrim, A., Duclos, J-Y.: DASP: Distributive Analysis Stata Package version 2.1. PEP, World Bank, UNDP and Université Laval (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ardington, C., Lam, D., Leibbrandt, M., Welch, M.: The sensitivity to key data imputations of recent estimates of income poverty and inequality in South Africa. Econ. Model. 23, 822–835 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhorat, H., Cassim, R.: The challenge of growth, employment and poverty in the South African economy since democracy: an exploratory review of selected issues. Dev. South Afr. 21(1), 7–31 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casale, D.: What has the feminisation of the labour market ‘bought’ women in South Africa? Trends in labour force participation, employment and earnings, 1995–2001. Development Policy Research Unit, Working Paper 04/84. DPRU, Cape Town (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casale, D., Muller, C., Posel, D.: Two million net new jobs: a reconsideration of the rise in employment in South Africa, 1995–2003. S. Afr. J. Econ. 72(5), 978–1002 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cichello, P.L., Fields, G.S., Leibbrandt, M.: Are African workers getting ahead in the New South Africa? Evidence from KwaZulu-Natal, 1993–1998. Soc. Dyn. 27(1), 120–139 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cichello, P.L., Fields, G.S., Leibbrandt, M.: Earnings and employment dynamics for Africans in post-apartheid South Africa: a panel study of KwaZulu-Natal. J. Afr. Econ. 14(2), 143–190 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniels, R.: The income distribution with coarse data. Economic Research Southern Africa, Working Paper Number 82. ERSA, Cape Town (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Department of Labour: Basic Conditions of Employment Act (No. 75 of 1997) as amended by the Basic Conditions of Employment Amendment Act, 2002. South African Department of Labour, Pretoria (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Durrant, G.B.: Imputation methods for handling item-nonresponse in the social sciences: a methodological review. National Centre for Research Methods Working Paper Series, June 2005. National Centre for Research Methods and Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heeringa, S., Little, R.J.A., Raghunathan, T.: Imputation of multivariate data on household net worth. In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, 135–140 (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heitjan, D.: Ignorability in general incomplete-data models. Biometrika 81(4), 701–708 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heitjan, D.F., Rubin, D.B.: Ignorability and coarse data. Ann. Stat. 19(4), 2244–2253 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoogeveen, J.G., Özler, B.: Poverty and inequality in post-apartheid South Africa: 1995–2000. In: Bhorat, H., Kanbur, R. (eds.) Poverty and policy in post-apartheid South Africa, pp. 59–94. HRSC Press, Pretoria (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Korinek, A., Mistiaen, J., Ravallion, M.: Survey nonresponse and the distribution of income. J. Econ. Inequality, 4(1), 33–55 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lacerda, M., Ardington, C., Leibbrandt, M.: Sequential Regression Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Multivariate Data using Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit Working Paper Number 13. SALDRU, Cape Town (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leibbrandt, M., Levinsohn, J., McCrary, J.: Incomes in South Africa since the Fall of Apartheid. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 11384 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leibbrandt, M., Poswell, L., Naidoo, P., Welch, M., Woolard, I.: Measuring recent changes in South Africa inequality and poverty using 1996 and 2001 census data. In: Bhorat, H., Kanbur, R. (eds.) Poverty and policy in post-apartheid South Africa, pp. 95–142. HRSC Press, Pretoria (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leibbrandt, M., Woolard, I., Finn, A., Argent, J.: Trends in South African Income Distribution and Poverty Since the Fall of Apartheid. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 101. OECD, Paris (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leite, P.G., McKinley, T., Osorio, R.G.: The post-apartheid evolution of earnings inequality in South Africa, 1995–2004. United Nations Development Programme, International Poverty Centre, Working Paper 32 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Majid, N.: The size of the working poor population in developing countries. Employment Paper 2001/16. International Labour Organization, Geneva (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meth, C.: What was the poverty headcount in 2004 and how does it compare to recent estimates by van der Berg et al? Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit Working Paper Number 1. SALDRU, Cape Town (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meth, C., Dias, R.: Increases in Poverty in South Africa, 1999–2002. Dev. South. Afr. 21(1), 59–85 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Muller, C., Posel, D.: Concerns with measuring informal sector employment: an analysis of national household surveys in South Africa, 1993–2001. Stud. Econ. Econometrics. 28(1), 1–20 (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Purchasing power parities and real expenditures 2007: 2005 Benchmark Year. OECD Publishing, Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pauw, K., Mncube, L.: The impact of growth and redistribution on poverty and inequality in South Africa. Development Policy Research Unit, Working Paper 07/126. DPRU, Cape Town (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Posel, D., Casale, D.: Who replies in brackets and what are the implications for earnings estimates? An analysis of earnings data from South Africa. Economic Research Southern Africa, Working Paper Number 7. ERSA, Cape Town (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Potgieter, J.F.: The Household Subsistence Level in the Major Urban Centres of the Republic of South Africa. Institute for Planning Research Fact Paper No. 107. University of Port Elizabeth, Port Elizabeth (1999)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Raghunathan, T.E., Lepkowski, J.M., Van Hoewyk, J., Solenberger, P.: A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Surv. Methodol. 27(1), 85–95 (2001)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Royston, P.: Multiple imputation of missing values: update. Stat. J. 5, 188–201 (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rubin, D.B.: Multiple imputation for non-response in surveys. Wiley, New York (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schäfer, C.: Working poor: ‘inequitable’ wages in Germany and Europe—(Higher) minimum wages as an instrument of justice? In: Ott, N. and Wagner, G. (eds.) Income inequality poverty in Eastern and Western Europe. Physica, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Silverman, B.W.: Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London (1986)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Statistics South Africa: Consumer Price Index (CPI). Statistical Release P0141.1. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Statistics South Africa: Labour Force Survey: Unit Records. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria (2000–2006, inclusive)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    van der Berg, S., Burger, R., Burger, R., Louw, M., Yu, D.: Trends in poverty and inequality since the political transition. Development Policy Research Unit, Working Paper 06/104. DPRU, Cape Town (2006)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    van der Berg, S., Louw, M., Yu, D.: Post-transition poverty trends based on an alternative data source. S. Afr. J. Econ. 76(1), 58–76 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    von Fintel, D.: Dealing with earnings bracket responses in household surveys–How sharp are midpoint imputations? S. Afr. J. Econ. 75(2), 293–312 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and Finance, Westville CampusUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations