Advertisement

The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 195–214 | Cite as

Multidimensional poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean: new evidence from the Gallup World Poll

  • Leonardo Gasparini
  • Walter Sosa-Escudero
  • Mariana Marchionni
  • Sergio Olivieri
Article

Abstract

This paper studies poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean from a multidimensional perspective, exploiting the Gallup World Poll, a survey that provides a unique opportunity to perform intercountry comparisons. By applying factor analysis we find that welfare can be appropriately summarized by three dimensions: income, subjective welfare and “basic needs”. Another finding is that the US$ 1 line appears to be a reasonable cut-off value to measure food deprivation.

Keywords

Latin America Caribbean Deprivation Poverty Welfare Multidimensional Gallup 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, S., Ravallion, M.: Absolute poverty measures for the developing world, 1981-2004. PNAS 104(43), 16757–16762 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cleveland, W.: Visualizing Data. Hobart Press, New Jersey (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deaton, A.: Income, health, and well-being around the world: evidence from the Gallup World Poll. J. Econ. Perspect. 22(2), 53–72(20) (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feres, J.C., Mancero, X.: Enfoques para la medición de la pobreza. Breve revisión de la literatura. CEPAL, Estudios estadísticos y prospectivos 4 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gasparini, L., Glüzmann, P.: Estimating income poverty and inequality from the Gallup World Poll: the case of Latin America and the Caribbean. CEDLAS Working Paper N° 83, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gasparini, L., Sosa Escudero, W., Marchionni, M., Olivieri, S.: Income, deprivation, and perceptions in Latin America and the Caribbean: new evidence from the Gallup World Poll. CEDLAS Working Paper N° 100. Universidad Nacional de La Plata (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Härdle, W.: Applied Non-Parametric Regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menard, S.: Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis. Am. Stat. 54–1, 17–24 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pradhan, M., Ravallion, M.: Measuring poverty using qualitative perceptions of consumption adequacy. Rev. Econ. Stat. 82(3), 462–471 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ravallion, M., Datt, G., van de Walle, D.: Quantifying absolute poverty in the developing World. Rev. Income Wealth 37(4), 345–361 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ravallion, M., Lokshin, M.: Identifying welfare effects from subjective questions. Economica 68(271), 335–357 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ravallion, M., Lokshin, M.: Self-rated economic welfare in Russia. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46, 1453–1473 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sacks, D., Stevenson, B., Wolfers, J.: Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. NBER Working Paper 16441 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Gasparini
    • 1
  • Walter Sosa-Escudero
    • 2
  • Mariana Marchionni
    • 1
  • Sergio Olivieri
    • 1
  1. 1.CEDLAS, Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias EconómicasUniversidad Nacional de La PlataLa PlataArgentina
  2. 2.Universidad de San Andrés (UdeSA) and CEDLASLa PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations