Skip to main content

On the characterization and economic evaluation of income mobility as a process of distributional change

Abstract

The paper employs a rank-dependent formulation of the social welfare function with time-separable utilities to evaluate the economic consequences of the mobility process underlying the transformation of the income distribution over time. The resultant class of measures can be decomposed either in terms of structural and exchange mobility or in terms of vertical and horizontal mobility, thereby encompassing two major approaches in the literature. Illustrative results show that income mobility in the USA was both less pro-poor in absolute terms and more horizontally inequitable than in Germany, but that the latter did not translate into higher exchange mobility given higher levels of absolute inequality and the vertical stance of the growth process.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Adsera, A., Boix, C.: Must we choose? European unemployment, American inequality, and the impact of education and labor market institutions. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 16, 611–638 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R.: Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? J. Pub. Econ. 88, 2009–2042 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F.: The comparison of multi-dimensioned distributions of economic status. Rev. Econ. Stud. 49, 183–201 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ayala, L., Sastre, M.: Europe vs. The United States: Is there a Trade-off between Mobility and Inequality? European Economy Group Working Paper 19/2002 (2002)

  6. 6.

    Benabou, R., Ok, E.A.: Mobility as progressivity: ranking income processes according to equality of opportunity. Working Paper 8431, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. (2001)

  7. 7.

    Benabou, R., Ok, E.A.: Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. Quart. J. Econ. 116, 447–487 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Berrebi, Z.M., Silber, J.: Weighting income ranks and levels—a multiple-parameter generalization for absolute and relative inequality indices. Econ. Lett. 7, 391–397 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Biewen, M., Jenkins, S.P.: A framework for the decomposition of poverty differences with an application to poverty differences between countries. Empirical Econ. 30, 331–358 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Broome, J.: What’s the good of equality?. In: Hey, J.D. (ed.) Current Issues in Microeconomics, pp. 236–62. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Burkhauser, R.V., Poupore, J.: A cross-national comparison of permanent inequality in the United States and Germany. Rev. Econ. Stat. 79, 10–17 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cook, R.D., Weisberg, S.: Residuals and Influence in Regression. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dardanoni, V.: Measuring social mobility. J. Econ. Theory 61, 372–394 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Duclos, J.-Y., Jalbert, V., Araar, A.: Classical horizontal inequity and reranking: an integrating approach. Res. Econ. Inequality 10, 65–100 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Essama-Nssah, B.: A unified framework for pro-poor growth analysis. Econ. Lett. 89, 216–221 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fields, G.S.: Does Income Mobility Equalize Longer-Term Incomes? New measures of an old concept. Working paper, Cornell University (2005)

  17. 17.

    Fields, G.S., Ok, E.A.: The measurement of income mobility: an introduction to the literature. In: Silber, J. (ed.) Handbook of Income Distribution Measurement. Chapter 19, pp. 557–598. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Filliben, J.J.: The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality. Technometrics 17, 111–117 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Frick, J., Jenkins, S., Lillard, D., Lipps, O., Wooden, M.: The cross-national equivalent file (CNEF) and its member country household panel studies. Schmollers Jahrbuch , Duncker and Humblot, Berlin, 127, 627–654 (2007)

  20. 20.

    Gottschalk, P., Spolaore, E.: On the evaluation of economic mobility. Rev. Econ. Stud. 69, 191–208 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hastie, T., Loader, C.: Local regression: automatic kernel carpentry. Stat. Sci. 8, 120–129 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jenkins, S.P., Van Kerm, P.: Trends in income inequality, pro-poor income growth and income mobility. Oxford Econ. Pap. 58, 531–548 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kakwani, N., Khandker, S., Son, H.: Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies. UNDP International Poverty Centre Working Paper No 1, http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper1.pdf (2004)

  24. 24.

    Kaplow, L.: The value of a statistical life and the coefficient of relative risk aversion. J. Risk Uncertainty 31, 23–34 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lambert, P.J.: The Distribution and Redistribution of Income: A Mathematical Analysis (3e). Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK. ISBN 0719057329 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lerman, R.I., Yitzhaki, S.: Improving the accuracy of estimates of Gini coefficients. J. Econometrics 42, 43–47 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Maasoumi, E., Trede, M.: Comparing income mobility in Germany and the United States using generalized entropy mobility measures. Rev. Econ. Stat. 83, 551–559 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Meyer, D.J., Meyer, J.: Measuring Risk Aversion. Now, Hanover (2006). ISBN 193301945X

  29. 29.

    Reynolds, M., Smolensky, E.: Public Expenditure, Taxes and the Distribution of Income. Academic Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ruiz-Castillo, J.: The measurement of structural and exchange mobility. J. Econ. Inequality 2, 219–228 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sasieni, P.: gr27. An adaptive variable span running line smoother. Stata Tech. B. 41, 4–7 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shorrocks, A.F.: The measurement of mobility. Econometrica 46, 1013–1024 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Silber, J., Weber, M.: Gini’s mean difference and the measurement of absolute mobility. Metron Int. J. Stat. 63, 471–492 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Solon, G.: Cross-country differences in intergenerational earnings mobility. J. Econ. Perspect. 16, 59–66 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Spitzer, J.J.: A primer on Box–Cox estimation. Rev. Econ. Statist. 64, 307–313 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Van Kerm, P.: What lies behind income mobility? Reranking and distributional change in Belgium, Western Germany and the USA. Economica 71, 223–239 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yitzhaki, S.: On an extension of the Gini inequality index. Int. Econ Rev. 24, 617–628 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yitzhaki, S., Wodon, Q.: Inequality, mobility, and horizontal equity. In: Amiel, Y., Bishop, J.A. (eds.) Studies on Economic Well-Being: Essays in Honor of John P. Formby, Research on Economic Inequality, vol. 12, pp. 177–198. Elsevier, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zarembka, P.: Functional form in the demand for money. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63, 502–511 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Francis Allanson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allanson, P.F. On the characterization and economic evaluation of income mobility as a process of distributional change. J Econ Inequal 10, 505–528 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9172-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Income mobility
  • Welfare analysis
  • USA
  • Germany