Skip to main content

The conceptualization and measurement of social polarization

Abstract

The conceptualization and measurement of social polarization has received little attention from the literature. The Reynal-Querol (RQ) index, the only measure that has been used to measure religious or ethnic polarization in the literature, does not take into account alienation between individuals, a fundamental component in a polarization index. In this paper we present two axiomatically characterized social polarization indices incorporating this alienation component: the first one focuses on between group alienation only and the second one takes also into account alienation within groups. Our empirical results using data from the World Value Surveys suggest that the new indices might be good predictors of the occurrence of conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Araar, A., Duclos, J-Y.: DAD: A Software for Poverty and Distributive Analysis. PMMA Working Paper 2006-10 (2006)

  2. 2.

    Alesina, A., Spalaore, E.: On the number and size of nations. Q. J. Econ. 113, 1027–1056 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chakravarty, S.R., Majumder, A.: Inequality, polarization and welfare: theory and applications. Aust. Econ. Pap. 40, 1–13 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Duclos, J.-Y., Esteban, J., Ray, D.: Polarization: concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica 72, 1737–1772 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Esteban, J., Gradin, C., Ray, D.: An extension of a measure of polarization, with an application to the income distribution of five OECD countries. Journal of Economic Inequality 5(1), 1–19 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Esteban, J., Ray, D.: On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62, 819–852 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Esteban, J., Ray, D.: Conflict and distribution. J. Econ. Theory 87, 379–415 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gigliarano, C., Mosler, K.: Constructing indices of multivariate polarization. Journal of Economic Inequality 7(4), 435–460 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Horowitz, D.L.: Ethnic Groups in Conflict. University of California Press, Berkeley (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Montalvo, J.G., Reynal-Querol, M.: Why Ethnic Fractionalization? Polarization, Ethnic Conflict and Growth. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Economics Working Paper No. 660 (2002)

  11. 11.

    Montalvo, J.G., Reynal-Querol, M.: Ethnic polarization, potential conflict and civil wars. Am. Econ. Rev. 95, 796–815 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Montalvo, J.G., Reynal-Querol, M.: Ethnic diversity and economic development. J. Dev. Econ. 76, 293–323 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rodriguez, J.G., Salas, R.: Extended Bi-polarization and Inequality Measures. Mimeo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (2002)

  14. 14.

    Wang, Y.Q., Tsui, K.Y.: Polarization orderings and new classes of polarization indices. J. Public Econ. Theory 2, 349–363 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wolfson, M.C.: When inequalities diverge. Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 353–358. Papers and Proceedings (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wolfson, M.C.: Divergent inequalities: theory and empirical results. Rev. Income Wealth 43, 401–421 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhang, X., Kanbur, R.: What difference do polarization measures make? An application to China. J. Dev. Stud. 37, 85–98 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iñaki Permanyer.

Additional information

I. Permanyer is a Fulbright visiting Scholar at Cornell University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Permanyer, I. The conceptualization and measurement of social polarization. J Econ Inequal 10, 45–74 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9143-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Income polarization
  • Social polarization
  • Alienation
  • Axiomatics