Abstract
In this paper it is argued that subjective well-being (SWB) of the individual depends on two types of variables. The first type consists of characteristics of the individual himself, such as age, health, income, etc. The second type of variables consists of the characteristics of the individuals belonging to his reference group. The vast literature about happiness, quality of life, and well-being informs us extensively about the effects of objective variables. How the second type affects well-being is much less investigated. It is argued that the concept of well-being inequality cannot be properly defined without taking the referencing process into account. The reference effect depends on how frequently individuals compare with others and on the degree of social transparency in society. We attempt to give a structural embedding of the idea of reference groups in SWB-models. In this paper we employ the reference-extended model for incorporating in happiness studies the concept of inequality in happiness or SWB. Finally, we plead for an extension of the present happiness paradigm by setting up a new additional agenda for empirical research in order to get quantified knowledge about the referencing process. As a first step we suggest a new question module to be included in new survey questionnaires.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263 (1970)
Blanchflower, D.G., Oswald, A.: Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J. Public Econ. 88, 1359–1386 (2004)
Clark, A.E., Senik, C.: Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Working Paper n2008–65, CEPREMAP, Paris School of Economics (2009)
Clark, A.E., Frijters, P., Shields, M.A.: Relative income, happiness and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. J. Econ. Lit. 46, 95–144 (2008)
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., White, M.: Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J. Econ. Psychol. 29, 94–122 (2008)
Easterlin, R.A.: Life cycle happiness and its sources: intersections of psychology, economics, and demography. J. Econ. Psychol. 27, 463–482 (2006)
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A.: Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison. Income effect. J. Public Econ. 89, 997–1019 (2005)
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., Frijters, P.: How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ. J. 114, 641–659 (2004)
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., Van Praag, B.M.S.: Income satisfaction inequality and its causes. J. Econ. Inequality 1, 107–127 (2003)
Frey, B.S., Stutzer, A.: What can economists learn from happiness research? J. Econ. Lit. 40, 402–435 (2002)
Graham, C.: The economics of happiness: new lenses for old policy puzzles. In: Durlauf, S., Blume, L. (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edn. Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire (2008)
Graham, C., Felton, A.: Inequality and happiness: insights from Latin America. J. Econ. Inequality 4, 107–122 (2006)
Hagenaars, A.J.M., van Praag, B.M.S.: A synthesis of poverty line definitions. Rev. Income Wealth 31, 139–153 (1985)
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., Schwarz, N., Stone, A.A.: A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 3 306(no. 5702), 1776–1780 (2004)
Kapteyn, A., Van Praag, B.M.S., Van Herwaarden, F.G.: Individual welfare functions and social reference spaces. Econ. Lett., Elsevier 1(2), 173–177 (1978)
Layard, R.: Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Penguin, London (2005)
Luttmer, E.F.P.: Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Q. J. Econ. 120, 963–1002 (2005)
Plug, E.S., Van Praag, B.M.S.: Family equivalence scales within a narrow and broad welfare context. J. Income Distrib. 4(2), 171–186 (1995)
Senik, C.: When information dominates comparison. Learning from Russian subjective panel data. J. Public Econ. 88, 2099–2133 (2004)
Senik, C.: Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 72, 408–424 (2007)
Stutzer, A.: The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 54, 89–109 (2004)
Van Praag, B.M.S.: The individual welfare function and its offspring. In: Cramer, J.S., et al. (eds.) Relevance and Precision, pp. 263–293. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1976)
Van Praag, B.M.S.: The perception of welfare inequality. Eur. Econ. Rev. 10, 189–207 (1977)
Van Praag, B.M.S.: Reflections on the theory of individual welfare functions. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (1981)
Van Praag, B.M.S., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A.: Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach (revised edition). Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004,2008)
Van Praag, B.M.S., Kapteyn, A., van Herwaarden, F.G.: The definition and measurement of social reference spaces. Neth. J. Sociol. 15, 13–25 (1979)
Wunder, C., Wiencierz, A., Schwarze, J., Küchenhoff, H., Kleyer, S., Bleninger, P.: Well-being over the life span: semiparametric evidence from British and German longitudinal data. IZA Dp No. 4155 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Van Praag, B. Well-being inequality and reference groups: an agenda for new research. J Econ Inequal 9, 111–127 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9127-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9127-2