Skip to main content

Does philanthropy reduce inequality?

Abstract

Wealthy individuals often voluntarily provide public goods that the poor also consume. We show that, rather than reducing it, such philanthropy may aggravate absolute inequality in welfare achievement, while leaving the change in relative inequality ambiguous. Additionally, philanthropic preferences may increase the effectiveness of policies to redistribute income, instead of weakening them. Our results thus suggest that philanthropy and direct redistribution may often be better viewed as complements, rather than substitutes, in the context of inequality reduction. In so doing, they also bring into question the general normative case for large tax deductions for charitable contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Andreoni, J.: Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J. 100, 464–477 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Andreoni, J., Payne, A.: Do government grants to private charities crowd out giving or fund-raising? Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 792–812 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., Varian, H.: On the private provision of public goods. J. Public Econ. 29, 25–49 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Blumkin, T., Sadka, E.: A case for taxing charitable contributions. J. Public Econ. 91, 1555–1564 (2007a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Blumkin, T., Sadka, E.: On the desirability of taxing charitable contributions. CESifo Working Paper 1900 (2007b)

  6. 6.

    Boadway, R., Marchand, M.: The use of public expenditures for redistributive purposes. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 47, 45–59 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bossert, W., Pfingsten, A.: Intermediate inequality: concepts, indices and welfare implications. Math. Soc. Sci. 19, 117–134 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Breunig, R., Dasgupta, I.: Do intra-household effects explain the food stamp cash-out puzzle? Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87, 552–568 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chakravarty, S., Tyagarupananda, S.: The subgroup decomposable absolute indices of inequality. In: Chakravarty, S.R., Coondoo, D., Mukherjee, R. (eds.) Quantitative Economics: Theory and Practice. Allied, New Delhi (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cornes, R.: Measuring the distributional impact of public goods. In: Van de Walle, D., Nead, K. (eds.) Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence. Johns Hopkins University Press/World Bank, Washington (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cornes, R., Sandler, T.: The comparative static properties of the impure public good model. J. Public Econ. 54, 403–421 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cornes, R., Sandler, T.: The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cornes, R., Sandler, T.: Pareto-improving redistribution and pure public goods. Ger. Econ. Rev. 1, 169–186 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    D’Arcy, D.: Artful Dodgers. www.forbes.com/2002/07/03/0703hot.html (2002)

  15. 15.

    Dasgupta, I.: Why praise inequality? Public good provision, income distribution and social welfare. Discussion Paper 08/07, School of Economics, University of Nottingham (2008)

  16. 16.

    Dasgupta, I.: ‘Living’ wage, class conflict and ethnic strife. J. Econ. Behav. Organ 72, 750–765 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dasgupta, I., Kanbur, R.: Bridging communal divides: separation, patronage, integration. In: Barrett, C. (ed.) The Social Economics of Poverty: On Identities, Groups, Communities and Networks. Routledge, London (2005a)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dasgupta, I., Kanbur, R.: Community and anti-poverty targeting. J. Econ. Inequal. 3, 281–302 (2005b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dasgupta, I., Kanbur, R.: Community and class antagonism. J. Public Econ. 91, 1816–1842 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Diamond, P.: Optimal tax treatment of private contributions for public goods with and without warm glow preferences. J. Public Econ. 90, 897–919 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hrywna, M.: Obama’s budget would cut charitable deduction. The NonProfit Times February 27; www.nptimes.com/09Feb/npt-022709-1.html (2009)

  22. 22.

    Itaya, J., de Meza, D., Myles, G.: In praise of inequality: public good provision and income distribution. Econ. Lett. 57, 289–296 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kolm, S.: Unequal inequalities I. J. Econ. Theory 12, 416–442 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kolm, S.: Unequal inequalities II. J. Econ. Theory 13, 82–111 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Leigh, G.: Small Matters of Life and Death. The Guardian, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Scruton, R.: The Meaning of Conservatism, 3rd edn. Palgrave, Houndmills (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zheng, B.: Unit-consistent decomposable inequality measures. Economica 74, 97–111 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indraneel Dasgupta.

Additional information

We thank two anonymous referees for many useful comments. We have also benefited from helpful discussions with Richard Cornes, Amrita Dhillon, Prasanta Pattanaik and seminar audiences at Brunel, Delhi School of Economics, Indian Statistical Institute and Jadavpur University. Financial support from The Pew Charitable Trusts is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dasgupta, I., Kanbur, R. Does philanthropy reduce inequality?. J Econ Inequal 9, 1–21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-009-9123-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Community
  • Public goods
  • Inequality
  • Distribution
  • Philanthropy