Skip to main content

A dwindling middle class? Italian evidence in the 2000s

Abstract

In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to household impoverishment in Italy. Most of previous analyses dealing with this issue are based on summary statistics, which may not capture the whole income distribution. This paper employs a non-parametric tool, the “relative distribution”, to describe patterns of changes in the entire Italian household income distribution over the period 2000–2004. This approach also allows for a decomposition of the relative density to isolate changes due to differences in location from changes due to differences in shape, thus enabling deeper analysis of income polarization. During the 2000s there was a significant location effect, and also increased income polarization, which has particularly affected incomes below the median. Analyses by social groups, according to the employment status of the household head, show significant re-distribution effects within groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Baldini M.: Le molte conferme sulla povertà in Italia. www.lavoce.info, 13 October (2005)

  2. 2.

    Banca d’Italia: Italian Household Budgets in 2004, Supplements to the Statistical Bulletin, Banca d’Italia, XVI, No. 17 (2006)

  3. 3.

    Boeri, T., Brandolini, A.: The age of discontent: Italian households at the beginning of the decade. G. Econ. Ann. Econ. 63(3/4), 449–487 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bernhardt, A., Morris M., Handcock, M.S.: Women’s gains or men’s losses? A closer look at the shrinking gender gap in earnings. Am. J. Sociol. 101(2), 302–328 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Brandolini, A.: The distribution of personal income in post-war Italy: source description, data quality and the time pattern of income inequality. G. Econ. Ann. Econ. 58(2), 183–239 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ćwik, J., Mielniczuck, J.: Data-dependent bandwidth choice for a grade density kernel estimate. Stat. Probab. Lett. 16, 397–405 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Duclos, J.Y., Esteban, J., Ray, D.: Polarization: concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica 72, 1737–1772 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Frick, J.R., Grabka, M.M.: Imputed rent and income inequality: a decomposition analysis for Great Britain, West Germany and the U.S. Rev. Income Wealth 49(4), 513–537 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Handcock, M.S.: Reldist: Relative Distribution Methods. R package version 1.5-3, http://www.stat.washington.edu/~handcock/RelDist (2005)

  10. 10.

    Handcock, M.S., Morris, M.: Relative distribution methods. Sociol. Method. 28, 53–97 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Handcock, M.S., Morris, M.: Relative Distribution Methods in the Social Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jenkins, S.P., Van Kerm, P.: Accounting for income distribution trends: a density function decomposition approach. J. Econ. Inequal. 3, 43–61 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Molanes-López, E.M., Cao, R.: Plug-in bandwidth selectors for the kernel relative density estimator. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. (2008) (forthcoming)

  14. 14.

    Morris, M., Bernhardt, A.D., Handcock, M.S.: Economic inequality: new methods for new trends. Am. Sociol. Rev. 59, 205–219 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Paiella, M.: Does Wealth Affect Consumption? Evidence for Italy. Banca d’Italia, Temi di discussione No. 510, Roma (2004)

  16. 16.

    Pittau, M.G., Zelli, R.: Testing for changing shapes of income distribution: Italian evidence in the 1990s from kernel density estimates. Empir. Econ. 29, 415–330 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pittau, M.G., Zelli, R.: Trends in income distribution in Italy: a non-parametric and a semi-parametric analysis. J. Income Distrib. 15, 90–118 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sheather, S.J., Jones, M.C.: A Reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 53, 683–690 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Smeeding, T.M., Saunders, P., Coder, J., Jenkins, S., Fritzell, J., Hagenaars, A.J.M., Hauser, R., Wolfson, M.: Poverty, inequality, and family living standards impacts across seven nations: the effects of non-cash subsidies for health, education and housing. Rev. Income Wealth 39(3), 229–256 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Trivellato, U.: Il monitoraggio della povertà e della sua dinamica: questioni di misura ed evidenze empiriche. Statistica 58(4), 549–574 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Voitchovsky, S.: Does the profile of income inequality matter for economic growth? J. Econ. Growth 10, 273–296 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yates, J.: Imputed rent and income distribution. Rev. Income Wealth 40(1), 43–66 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Grazia Pittau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massari, R., Pittau, M.G. & Zelli, R. A dwindling middle class? Italian evidence in the 2000s. J Econ Inequal 7, 333 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-008-9078-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Income distribution
  • Relative distribution
  • Polarization

JEL Classification

  • D31
  • C14