Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical inequality measures and the redistribution of income when needs differ

  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper considers nested social welfare functions and ethical inequality measures when households may differ in needs. Several principles of transfers between different household types are introduced and systematically examined. Their implications for the form of welfare functions and inequality measures are derived. The corresponding classes are completely described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bourguignon, F.: Family size and social utility. Income distribution dominance criteria. J. Econom. 42, 67–80 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dagum, C.: Relationship between inequality measures and social welfare functions. J. Econom. 43, 91–102 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalton, H.: The measurement of inequality of income. Econ. J. 30, 348–361 (1920).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Donaldson, D., Pendakur, K.: Equivalent-expenditure functions and expenditure-dependent equivalence scales. J. Public Econ. 88, 175–208 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebert, U.: Income inequality and differences in household size. Math. Soc. Sci. 30, 37–55 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ebert, U.: Absolute inequality indices and equivalence differences. In: S. Zandvikili (ed.) Taxation and Inequality, Research on Economic Inequality, vol. 7, pp 131–152. JAI Press, Greenwhich, CT (1997)

  7. Ebert, U.: Sequential generalized Lorenz dominance and transfer principles. Bull. Econ. Res. 52, 113–122 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebert, U.: Social welfare, inequality, and poverty when needs differ. Soc. Choice Welf. 23, 415–448 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebert, U.: Coherent inequality views: linear invariant measures reconsidered. Math. Soc. Sci. 47, 1–20 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebert, U.: Ethical inequality measures and the redistribution of income when needs differ, http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/vwl/download/Siena.pdf (2005)

  11. Hammond, P.J.: Equity, Arrow’s conditions, and Rawls’ difference principle. Econometrica 44, 793–804 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lorenz, M.O.: Methods of measuring concentration of wealth. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 9, 209–219 (1905)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shorrocks, A.F.: Inequality and welfare evaluation of heterogeneous income distribution. Journal of Economic Inequality 2, 193–218 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany

    Udo Ebert

Authors
  1. Udo Ebert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udo Ebert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebert, U. Ethical inequality measures and the redistribution of income when needs differ. J Econ Inequal 5, 263–278 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9052-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9052-6

Key words

JEL Classifications

Search

Navigation