The Journal of Economic Inequality

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 235–256 | Cite as

Equity, efficiency and inequality traps: A research agenda

  • François Bourguignon
  • Francisco H. G. Ferreira
  • Michael Walton
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses a research agenda that arises from unanswered questions and unresolved issues considered in the World Bank’s World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development. After formalizing the key concepts of equity; equality of opportunity; and efficiency, and proposing a definition for an equitable development policy, the paper discusses the concept of inequality traps, around which the research agenda is structured. Four broad groups of research questions are highlighted: those revolving around the measurement of inequality of opportunity and the diagnostics for the existence of an inequality trap; those dealing with the causes of inequality traps; the quantification of their efficiency costs; and those related to how institutions (including governments) evolve to overcome inequality traps.

Key words

equity equality of opportunity inequality traps. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.: Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.: The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(5), 1369–1401 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alesina, A., Angeletos, G.-M.: Fairness and redistribution. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(4), 960–980 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Angrist, J., Bettinger, E., Bloom, E., King, E., Kremer, M.: Vouchers for private schooling in Colombia: evidence from a randomized natural experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 92(5), 1535–1558 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Appadurai, A.: The capacity to aspire: culture and the terms of recognition. In: Rao, V., Walton, M. (eds.) Culture and Public Action. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Araujo, M. Caridad, F., Francisco, L., Peter, Özler, B.: Local inequality and project choice: theory and evidence from Ecuador. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series #3997 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arneson, R.: Equality of opportunity for welfare. Philos. Stud. 56, 77–93 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atkinson, A.B., Stiglitz, J.E.: Lectures on Public Economics. McGraw-Hill, London (1980)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Attanasio, O., Meghir, C., Santiago, A.: Education choices in Mexico: using a structural model and a randomized experiment to evaluate progresa. University College London, Processed (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baiocchi, G., Chaudhuri, S., Heller, P.: Evaluating Empowerment: Participatory Budgeting in Brazil. World Bank, Washington, DC Processed (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baland, J.M., Platteau, J.P.: Wealth inequality and efficiency in the commons. Part I. The unregulated case. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 49(4), 451–482 (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baland, J.M., Platteau, J.P.: Wealth inequality and efficiency in the commons. Part II. The regulated case. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 50(1), 1–22 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Banerjee, A., Moohkerjee, D., Munshi, K., Ray, D.: Inequality, control rights, and rent seeking: sugar cooperatives in Maharastra. J. Polit. Econ. 109(1), 138–190 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bardhan, P., Mookherjee, D.: Capture and governance at the local and national levels. AEA Papers and Proceedings 90(2), 135–139 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bardhan, P., Mookherjee, D.: Decentralizing antipoverty program delivery in developing countries. J. Public Econ. 89, 675–704 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bénabou, R.: Unequal societies: income distribution and the social contract. Am. Econ. Rev. 90(1), 96–129 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bénabou, R., Tirole, J.: Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. Q. J. Econ. 121(2), 699–746 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Besley, T., Burgess, R.: The political economy of government responsiveness: theory and evidence from India. Q. J. Econ. 117(4), 1415–1451 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Besley, T., Coate, S.: Lobbying and welfare in a representative democracy. Rev. Econ. Stud. 68, 67–82 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Besley, T., Pande, R., Rahman, L., Rao, V.: The politics of public good provision: evidence from Indian local governments. Journal of the European Economic Association 2, 416–426 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Betts, J., Roemer, J.: Equalizing Opportunity through Educational Finance Reform. mimeo, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bourdieu, P.: The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1990)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bourguignon, F., Verdier, T.: Oligarchy, democracy, inequality and growth. J. Dev. Econ. 62(2), 285–313 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F., Leite, P.: Conditional cash transfers, schooling, and child-labor: micro-simulating Brazil’s Bolsa Escola program. World Bank Econ. Rev. 17(2), 229–254 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F., Menéndez, M.: Inequality of outcomes and inequality of opportunities in Brazil. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 3174 (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Buchanan, J.M.: A Hobbesian interpretation of the Rawlsian difference principle. Kyklos 29(1), 5–25 (1976)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E.: Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 72(5), 1409–1443 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Checchi, D., Peragine, V.: Regional disparities and inequality of opportunity: the case of Italy. IZA Discussion Paper No.1874 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Claessens, S., Perotti, E.: The links between finance and inequality: channels and evidence. Background paper for the WDR 2006 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cohen, G.A.: On the currency of Egalitarian justice. Ethics 99, 906–944 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dworkin, R.: What is equality? Part 2. Equality of resources. Philos. Public Aff. 10(3), 185–246 (1981)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Engerman, S., Sokoloff, K.: Factor endowments, inequality and paths of development among new world economies. Economía 3(1), 41–110 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Engerman, S., Sokoloff, K.: The evolution of suffrage institutions in the new world. J. Econ. Hist. 65(4), 891–921 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ferreira, F.H.G. Education for the masses? The interaction between wealth, educational and political inequalities. Econ. Transit. 9(2), 533–552 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Galasso, E., Ravallion, M.: Decentralized targeting of an antipoverty program. J. Public Econ. 89, 705–727 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Grossman, G., Helpman, E.: Protection for sale. Am. Econ. Rev. 84(4), 833–850 (1994)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haber, S., Kantor, S.: Getting Privatization Wrong: The Mexican Banking System, 1991–2003. Stanford University, Stanford, CA Processed (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haber, S., Maurer, N.: Related Lending and Economic Performance: Evidence from Mexico. Stanford University, Stanford, CA Processed (2004)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Heller, P.: The Labor of Development: Workers and the Transformation of Capitalism in Kerala, India. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY (1999)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hoff, K.: Paths of Institutional Development: A institutional development: a view from economic history. World Bank Res. Obs. 18(2), 205–226 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hoff, K., Pandey, P.: Belief systems and durable inequalities: an experimental investigation of Indian caste. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 2875 (2004)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hoff, K., Pandey, P.: Economic consequences of social identity: discrimination, social identity and durable inequalities. AEA Papers and Proceedings, May 2006, 206–211 (2006)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kanbur, R. (ed.): Qualitative and quantitative poverty appraisal: Complementarities, tensions and the way forward. Delhi: Permanent Black (2003)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Khan, B. Zorina, S., Kenneth L.: Patent institutions, industrial organization and early technological change: Britain and the United States. In: Berg, M., Bruland, K. (eds.) Technological Revolutions in Europe. Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (1998)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Krueger, A.O.: The political economy of the rent-seeking society. Am. Econ. Rev. 64(3): 291–303 (1974)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nozick, R.: Anarchy, State and Utopy. New York: Basic (1974)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Piketty, T.: Social mobility and redistributive politics. Q. J. Econ. CX(3), 551–584 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pistolesi, N., Lefranc, A., Trannoy, A.: Inequality of opportunities vs. inequality of outcomes: are Western societies all alike?. Mimeo, Université de Cergy-Pontoise (2005)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rajan, R.G., Zingales, L.: Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists: Unleashing the Power of Financial Markets to Create Wealth and Spread Opportunity. Crown Business, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rajan, R.G., Zingales, L.: The persistence of underdevelopment: institutions, human capital, or constituencies? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12093 (2006)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rao, V.: On ‘inequality traps’ and development policy. Development Outreach, February, 10–13 (2006)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rao, V., Woolcock, M.: Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches in program evaluation. In: Bourguignon, François, Pereira Da Silva, Luiz (eds.) Tool Kit for Evaluating the Poverty and Distributional Impact of Economic Policies. World Bank, Washington, DC (2003, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Roemer, J.E.: Equality of Opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1998)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Roemer, J.E.: The 2006 World Development Report: equity and development – a review. Journal of Economic Inequality 4, 233–244 (2006).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Roemer, J.E., Aaberge, R., Colombino, U., Fritzell, J., Jenkins, S. P., Marx, I., Page, M., Pommer, E., Ruiz-Castillo J., Segundo, M.J.S., Traanes, T., Wagner, G., Zubiri, I.: To what extent do fiscal regimes equalize opportunities for income acquisition among citizens? J. Public Econ. 87, 539–565 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sen, A.: Equality of what? In: McMurrin S. (ed.) Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (1980)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sen, A.: Commodities and Capabilities. North Holland, Amsterdam (1985)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Steele, C.M.: Thin ice: ‘stereotype threat’ and black college students. Atl. Mon. 284(2), 44–54 (1999)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tendler, J.: Good government in the tropics. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1997)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Thirumurthy, H., Zivin, J., Goldstein, M.: The economic impact of aids treatment: labor supply in Western Kenya. World Bank.(2006, Processed)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Todd, P.E., Wolpin, K.I.: Ex-ante evaluation of social programs. University of Pennsylvania (2005, Processed)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Van de Gaer, D., Schokkaert, E., Martínez, M.: Three meanings of intergenerational mobility. Economica 68, 519–537 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    World Bank: World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development. World Bank, Washington, DC (2005, Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • François Bourguignon
    • 2
  • Francisco H. G. Ferreira
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael Walton
    • 3
  1. 1.Development Research GroupThe World BankWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Development Economics Vice-PresidencyThe World BankWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.John F. Kennedy School of GovernmentHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations