Skip to main content

The effects of measurement error and omitted variables when using transition matrices to measure intergenerational mobility

Abstract

This paper examines the consequences of specification error when transition matrices are used to analyse patterns of intergenerational mobility. We show that classical measurement error in both the child’s and parent’s earnings can lead to biased results, with summary mobility measures biased by as much as 20% in some cases. Furthermore our results suggest that the extent of the bias is most severe in the tails of the distribution. Omitted conditioning variables appear to have a modest effect on transition matrices in our model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Abul Naga, R.: Estimating the intergenerational correlation of incomes: an errors-in-variables framework. Economica 69, 69–91 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Atkinson, A.B., Maynard, A.K., Trinder, C.G.: Parents and Children. Heinemann, London, UK (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Becker, G., Tomes, N.: Human capital and the rise and fall of families. J. Labor Econ. 4, S1–S39 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Blanden, J.: International evidence on intergenerational mobility. Working Paper, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics (2005)

  5. 5.

    Bound, J., Brown, C., Duncan, G., Rodgers, W.: Evidence on the validity of cross-sectional and longitudinal labor market data. J. Labor Econ. 12(3), 345–368 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bound, J., Brown, C., Mathiowetz, N.: Measurement error in survey data. In: Heckman, J.J., Leamer, E. (eds.) Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 5, pp. 3707–3843 (2001)

  7. 7.

    Bowles. S.: Gintis: The inheritance of inequality. J. Econ. Perspect. 16(3), 3–30 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Breen, R., Moisio, P.: Poverty dynamics corrected for measurement error. Journal of Economic Inequality 2(3), 171–191 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Checchi, D., Dardanoni, V.: Mobility comparisons: does using different measures matter. Res. Econ. Inequal. 9, 113–145 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Corak, M., Heisz, A.: The intergenerational income mobility of Canadian men. Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper no. 89, Statistics Canada (1996)

  11. 11.

    Corak, M., Heisz, A.: The intergenerational earnings and income mobility of Canadian Men. J. Hum. Resour. 34, 504–533 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dearden, L., Machin, S., Reed, H.: Intergenerational mobility in Britain. Econ. J. 107, 47–66 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fields, G., Ok, E.: The measurement of income mobility: an introduction to the literature. In: Silber, J. (ed.) Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement, pp. 557–596. Boston, Kluwer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Goldberger, A.: Heritability. Economica 46, 327–347 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Grawe, N.: Reconsidering the use of non-linearities in intergenerational earnings mobility as a test for credit constraints. J. Hum. Resour. 39(3), 813–827 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Grawe, N.: Lifecycle Bias in Estimates of Intergenerational Earnings Persistence. Labour Economics 13(5), 551–570 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Grawe, N., Mulligan, C.: Economic interpretations of intergenerational correlations. J. Econ. Perspect. 6(3), 45–58 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Haider, S., Solon, G.: Life-cycle variation in the association between current and lifetime earnings. Am. Econ. Rev. 96(4), 1308–1319 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Han, S., Mulligan, C.B.: Human capital, heterogeneity, and estimated degrees of intergenerational mobility. Econ. J. 111, 207–243 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jenkins, S.: Snapshots versus movies: lifecycle biases and the estimation of intergenerational earnings inheritances. Eur. Econ. Rev. 31, 1149–1158 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kim, B., Solon, G.: Implications of mean-reverting measurement error for longitudinal studies of wages and employment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 87, 193–196 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Magnac, T., Visser, M.: Transition models with measurement errors. Rev. Econ. Stat. 81(3), 466–474 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Minicozzi, A.: Estimation of sons’ intergenerational earnings mobility in the presence of censoring. J. Appl. Econ. 18(3), 291–314 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mazumder, B.: Fortunate sons: new estimates of intergenerational mobility in the United States using social security earnings data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 87(2), 235–255 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    O’Neill, D., Sweetman, O., Van de gaer, D.: The consequences of non-classical measurement error for distributional analysis. Working Paper, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland (2004)

  26. 26.

    Pischke, J.-S.: Measurement error and earnings dynamics: some estimates from the PSID validation study. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 13(3), 305–314 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Poterba, J., Summers, L.: Reporting errors and labour market dynamics. Econometrica 54, 1319–1338 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Poterba, J., Summers, L.: Unemployment benefits and labour market transitions: a multinomial logit model with errors in classification. Rev. Econ. Stat. 77, 207–216 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Shorrocks, A.: The measurement of mobility. Econometrica 46(5), 1013–1024 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Solon, G.: Intergenerational income mobility in the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 82, 393–408 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Solon, G.: Intergenerational mobility in the labor market. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics vol, pp. 1761–1800. The Netherlands, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Solon, G.: Cross-country differences in intergenerational earnings mobility. J. Econ. Perspect. 16(3), 59–66 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zimmerman, D.J.: Regression towards mediocrity in economic stature. Am. Econ. Rev. 82, 409–429 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donal O’Neill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Neill, D., Sweetman, O. & Van de gaer, D. The effects of measurement error and omitted variables when using transition matrices to measure intergenerational mobility. J Econ Inequal 5, 159–178 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9035-7

Download citation

Key words

  • transition matrices
  • specification error
  • intergenerational mobility