An Extension of a Measure of Polarization, with an application to the income distribution of five OECD countries
- 571 Downloads
We introduce an extension of the Esteban and Ray [Econometrica, 62:819–851 1994] measure of polarization that can be applied to density functions. As a by-product we also derive the Wolfson [Am. Econ. Rev., 84:353–358 1994] measure as a special case. This derivation has the virtue of casting both measures in the context of a (statistically) unified framework. We study the polarization of the distribution of household income for five OECD countries (LIS database): US, UK, Canada, Germany and Sweden.
Key wordsincome distribution inequality polarization
JEL classificationD31 D63 I32
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Anderson, G.: Toward an empirical analysis of polarization. J. Econ. 122, 1–26 (2004)Google Scholar
- 2.Anderson, G.: “Polarization”, mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Toronto (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Chakravarty, S., Majumder, A., Roy, S.: A treatment of absolute indices of polarization. Mimeo, forthcoming in The Japanese Economic Review (2002)Google Scholar
- 6.Davies, J.B., Shorrocks, A.F.: Optimal grouping of income and wealth data. J. Econ. 42, 97–108 (1989)Google Scholar
- 9.Esteban, J., Gradín, C., Ray, D.: Extensions of a Measure of Polarization, with an Application to the Income Distributions of Five OECD Countries. Working Paper 24, Instituto de Estudios Económicos de Galicia-P. Barrié de la Maza, A Coruña, Spain. Also in: Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Working Paper Series, 218, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York (1999)Google Scholar
- 11.Love, R., Wolfson, M.C.: Income Inequality: Statistical Methodology and Canadian Illustrations, Catalogue 13–559 Occasional. Ottawa, Statistics Canada (1976)Google Scholar
- 14.Salas, R., Rodríguez, J.G.: Extended bi-polarization and inequality measures. Res. Econ. Inequal. 9, 69–83 (2002)Google Scholar
- 16.Wolfson, M.C.: When inequalities diverge. Am. Econ. Rev. 84, Papers and Proceedings, 353–358 (1994)Google Scholar