Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing poverty and deprivation dynamics: Issues of reliability and validity

  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we seek to establish if earlier findings relating to the relationship between income poverty persistence and deprivation persistence could be due to a failure to take measurement error into account. To address this question, we apply a model of dynamics incorporating structural and error components. Our analysis shows a general similarity between latent poverty and deprivation dynamics. In both cases we substantially over-estimate the probability of exiting from poverty or deprivation. We observe a striking similarity across dimensions for both observed and latent outcomes. In both cases levels of poverty and deprivation persistence are higher for the latent case. However, there is no evidence that earlier results relating to the differences in the determinants of poverty and deprivation persistence are a consequence of differential patterns of reliability. Taking measurement error into account seems more likely to accentuate rather than diminish the contrasts highlighted by earlier research. Since longitudinal differences relating to poverty and deprivation cannot be accounted for by measurement error, it seems that we must accept that we are confronted with issues relating to validity rather than reliability. Even where we measure these dimensions over reasonable periods of time and allow for measurement error, they continue to tap relatively distinct phenomenon. Thus, if measures of persistent poverty are to constitute an important component of EU social indicators, a strong case can be made for including parallel measures of deprivation persistence and continuing to explore the relationship between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson, A.B., Cantillon, B., Marlier, B. and Nolan, B.: Social Indicators: The European Union and Social Inclusion. Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bane, M.J. and Ellwood, D.T.: Slipping in and out of poverty: The dynamics of poverty spells, Journal of Human Resources 12 (1986), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basic, E. and Rendtel, R.: Latent Markov Chain Analysis of Income States with the European Community Household Panel: Empirical results on Measurement Error and attrition Bias, Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference of ECHP Users-EPUNet, Berlin, June 23–26, 2004.

  4. Breen, R. and Moisio, P.: Overestimated poverty mobility: Poverty dynamics corrected for measurement error, Journal of Economic Inequality 2(3) (2004), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buhman, B., Rainwater, L., Schmaus, G. and Smeeding, T.: Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality and poverty: Sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg income study database, Review of Income and Wealth 34 (1988), 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dewilde, C.: The multidimensional measurement of poverty in Belgium and Britain: A categorical approach, Journal of Social Indicators 68(3) (2004), 331–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duncan, G., Gustaffsin, B., Hauser, R., Schmaus, G., Messinger, H., Mufferls, R., Nolan, B. and Ray, J.: Poverty dynamics in eight countries, Journal of Population Economics 6 (1993), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fouarge, D. and Layte, R.: The duration of spells of poverty in Europe, Journal of Social Policy, 34(3) (2005), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon, D.: Measuring Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Dynamics of Poverty Workshop, Central European University, Budapest, May 24–25, 2002.

  10. Jarvis, S. and Jenkins, S.: Low income dynamics in the 1990s in Britain, Fiscal Study 18(2) (1999), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Layte, R. and Whelan, C.T.: Moving in and out of poverty, European Societies 5(2) (2003), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leisering, L. and Leibfried, S.: Time and Poverty in Western Welfare States: United Germany in Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mack, J. and Lansley, S.: Poor Britain, Allen and Unwin, London, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moisio, P.: Poverty Dynamics According to Direct, Indirect and Subjective Measures. Modelling Markovian Processes in a discrete time and space with error, STAKES Research Report 145, Helsinki (2004).

  15. Moisio, P.: A latent class application to the multidimensional measurement of poverty, Quantity and Quality–International Journal of Methodology 38(6) (2005), 703–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muffels, R. and Fouarge, D.: The role of European Welfare States in explaining resources deprivation, Social Indicators Research 68 (2004), 299–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pérez-Mayo, J.: Identifying deprivation profiles in Spain: A new approach, Applied Economics 37 (2005), 843–955.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perry, B.: The mismatch between income measures and direct outcome measures of poverty, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 19 (2002), 101–127.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rendtel, U., Langeheine, R. and Bernstein, R.: The estimation of poverty dynamics using different household income measures, Review of Income and Wealth 44 (1998), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ringen, S.: The Possibility of Politics, Clarendon, Oxford, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ringen, S.: Direct and indirect measures of poverty, Journal of Social Policy 17 (1988), 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vermunt, J.K., LEM: A General Programme for the Analysis of Categorical Data, Tilburg University, 1997.

  23. Watson, D. and Healy, M.: Sample Attrition Between Waves 1 And 2 in the European Community Household Panel, European Commission, Luxembourg, (1999) 118/99.

  24. Watson, D.: Sample attrition between wave 1 and 5 in the European Community Household Panel, European Sociological Review 19(4) (2003), 361–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Whelan, C.T., Layte, R., Maître, B. and Nolan, B.: Persistent income poverty and deprivation in the European Union: An analysis of the first three waves of the European Community Household Panel, Journal of Social Policy 32(1) (2003), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Whelan, C.T., Layte, R., Nolan, B. and Maître, B.: Income, deprivation and economic strain: An analysis of the European Community Household Panel, European Sociological Review 17(4) (2001), 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Whelan, C.T, Layte, R. and Maître, B.: Understanding the mismatch between income poverty and deprivation: A dynamic comparative analysis, European Sociological Review 20(4) (2004), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wirz, C. and Mejer, L.: The European Community Household Panel (ECHP), Schmollers Jahburch (Journal of Applied Social Studies) 112(1) (2002), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher T. Whelan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whelan, C.T., Maître, B. Comparing poverty and deprivation dynamics: Issues of reliability and validity. J Econ Inequal 4, 303–323 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-9017-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-9017-1

Key words

Navigation