Journal of Economic Growth

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 411–437 | Cite as

The past and future of knowledge-based growth

  • Holger StrulikEmail author
  • Klaus Prettner
  • Alexia Prskawetz


This paper consolidates two previously disconnected literatures. It integrates R&D-based innovations into a unified growth framework with micro-founded fertility and schooling behavior. The theory suggests a refined view on the human factor in productivity growth. It helps to explain the historical emergence of R&D-based growth and the subsequent emergence of mass education and the demographic transition. The model predicts that the erstwhile positive correlation between population growth and innovative activity turns negative during economic development. This “population-productivity reversal” explains why innovative modern economies are usually characterized by low or negative population growth. Because innovations in modern economies are based on the education of the workforce, the medium-run prospects for future economic growth—when fertility is going to be below replacement level in virtually all developed countries—are better than suggested by conventional R&D-based growth theories.


R&D Productivity Fertility Human capital Demographic transition 

JEL Classification

J13 J24 O10 O30 O40 



We would like to thank Carl-Johan Dalgaard, Oded Galor, Franz Hof, Peter Howitt, Dirk Krueger, and Ken Tabata as well as five anonymous referees for helpful comments.


  1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2009). The Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ahituv, A. (2001). Be fruitful or multiply: On the interplay between fertility and economic development. Journal of Population Economics, 14, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashraf, Q., & Galor, O. (2011). Dynamics and stagnation in the Malthusian epoch. American Economic Review, 101, 2003–2041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baier, S. L., Dwyer, P. G, Jr, & Tamura, R. (2006). How important are capital and total factor productivity for economic growth? Economic Inquiry, 44, 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In: National Bureau of Economic Research (Eds.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–231). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bernanke, B. S., & Gürkaynak, R. S. (2001). Is growth exogenous? Taking Mankiw, Romer, and Weil seriously. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 16, 11–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bongaarts, J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review, 27, 260–281.Google Scholar
  10. Bottazi, L., & Peri, G. (2003). Innovation, demand, and knowledge spillovers: Evidence form European patent data. European Economic Review, 47, 687–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brander, J. A., & Dowrick, S. (1994). The role of fertility and population in economic growth. Journal of Population Economics, 7, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broadberry, S., Campbell, B., Klein, A., Overton, M., & van Leuwwen, B. (2010). British Economic Growth 1270–1870. Discussion Paper. University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  13. Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G., & Liao, C.-H. (2013). Endogenous fertility and human capital in a Schumpeterian growth model. Journal of Population Economics, 26, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connolly, M., & Peretto, P. F. (2003). Industry and the family: Two engines of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 115–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalgaard, C.-J., & Kreiner, C. T. (2001). Is declining productivity inevitable? Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalgaard, C.-J., & Strulik, H. (2013). The history augmented Solow model. European Economic Review, 63, 134–149.Google Scholar
  17. De La Croix, D., & Doepke, M. (2003). Inequality and growth: Why differential fertility matters. American Economic Review, 93, 1091–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De La Croix, D., & Doepke, M. (2004). Public versus private education when differential fertility matters. Journal of Development Economics, 73, 607–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Funke, M., & Strulik, H. (2000). On endogenous growth with physical capital, human capital, and product variety. European Economic Review, 44, 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galor, O. (2005). From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1A). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Galor, O. (2011). Unified growth theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Galor, O., & Moav, O. (2002). Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1133–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galor, O., & Moav, O. (2004). From physical to human capital accumulation: Inequality and the process of development. Review of Economic Studies, 71, 1001–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galor, O., Moav, O., & Vollrath, D. (2009). Inequality in landownership, the emergence of human-capital promoting institutions, and the Great Divergence. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (2000). Population, technology and growth: From the Malthusian regime to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review, 90, 806–828.Google Scholar
  26. Gordon, R. J. (1999). U.S. economic growth since 1870: One big wave? American Economic Review, 89, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grossmann, V. (2010). Entrepreneurial innovation and economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 31, 602–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Growiec, J. (2006). Fertility choice and semi-endogenous growth: Where Becker meets Jones. Topics in Macroeconomics, 6, Article 10.Google Scholar
  29. Ha, J., & Howitt, P. (2007). Accounting for trends in productivity and R &D. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 39, 733–774.Google Scholar
  30. Herzer, D., Vollmer, S., & Strulik, H. (2012). The long-run determinants of fertility: One century of demographic change 1900–1999. Journal of Economic Growth, 17, 357–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howitt, P. (1999). Steady endogenous growth with population and R &D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Human Fertility Database. (2012). Human Fertility Database. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research and Vienna Institute of Demography.Google Scholar
  34. Jaffe, A., Tratjenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63, 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, C. I. (1995). R &D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 759–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones, C. I. (2001). Was an industrial revolution inevitable? Economic growth over the very long run. Advances in Macroeconomics, 1, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones, C. I. (2002). Sources of U.S. economic growth in a world of ideas. American Economic Review, 92, 220–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelley, A. C., & Schmidt, R. (1995). Aggregate population and economic growth correlations: The role of the components of demographic change. Demography, 32, 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keller, W. (2002). Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review, 92, 120–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keller, W. (2009). International trade, foreign direct investment, and technology spillovers. NBER Working Paper 15442.Google Scholar
  41. Kortum, S. (1997). Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica, 65, 1389–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kremer, M. (1993). Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 681–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li, C.-W. (2000). Endogenous vs. semi-endogenous growth in a two R &D-sector model. Economic Journal, 110, C109–C122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li, H., & Zhang, J. (2007). Do high birth rates hamper economic growth? Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maddison, A. (2001). The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. Paris: Development Center Studies, OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Madsen, J. B. (2008). Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: Testing the knowledge production function using international data. Journal of Economic Growth, 13, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Madsen, J. B., Ang, J. B., & Banerjee, R. (2010). Four centuries of British economic growth: The roles of technology and population. Journal of Economic Growth, 15, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moav, O. (2005). Cheap children and the persistence of poverty. Economic Journal, 115, 88–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Myrskyla, M., Kohler, H.-P., & Billari, F. C. (2009). Advances in development reverse fertility decline. Nature, 460, 741–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. OECD. (2012). Research and Development Statistics (RDS).,3746,en_2649_34273_34537140_1_1_1_1,00.html.
  52. Peretto, P. F. (1998). Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reher. (2004). The demographic transition revisited as a global process. Population, Space and Place, 10, 19–41.Google Scholar
  55. Segerstrom, P. (1998). Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review, 88, 1290–1310.Google Scholar
  56. Strulik, H. (2005). The role of human capital and population growth in R &D-based models of economic growth. Review of International Economics, 13, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strulik, H., Prettner, K., Prskawetz, A. (2010). R &D-based growth in the post-modern era. Working Paper 1009. Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna.Google Scholar
  58. Strulik, H., & Vollmer, S. (2013). The fertility transition around the World 1950–2005. Journal of Population Economics forthcoming.Google Scholar
  59. Strulik, H., & Weisdorf, J. (2008). Population, food, and knowledge: A simple unified growth model. Journal of Economic Growth, 13, 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. UN. (2008). United Nations World Population Prospects: 2008 revision. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division.Google Scholar
  61. UN. (2011). United Nations World Population Prospects: 2010 revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. New York.
  62. U.S. National Center for Health Statistics. (2010). National Vital Statistics Reports Volume 58 (16), Births: Preliminary Data for 2008. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  63. World Bank (2012). World Development Indicators & Global Development Finance Database.Google Scholar
  64. Young, A. (1998). Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holger Strulik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Klaus Prettner
    • 1
  • Alexia Prskawetz
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GoettingenGoettingenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Mathematical Methods in EconomicsVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  3. 3.Vienna Institute of Demography, Austrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria
  4. 4.Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human CapitalViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations