Advertisement

Journal of Economic Growth

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 49–69 | Cite as

A polarization-cohesion perspective on cross-country convergence

  • Gordon AndersonEmail author
  • Oliver Linton
  • Teng Wah Leo
Article

Abstract

Understanding whether the gap between rich and poor country wellbeing is narrowing is really about whether rich and poor groups can be identified in the overall size distribution of the characteristic of interest, and how those respective subgroup size distributions are changing. Here two simple statistics for analyzing the issue are introduced which are capable of discerning, in many dimensions, changes in the underlying distributions which reflect combinations of increasing (decreasing) subgroup location differences and decreasing (increasing) subgroup spreads, which are the characteristics of polarization (de-polarization). When applied in an examination of the distribution of lifetime GDP per capita over time, the population weighted version exhibits de-polarization and the unweighted version exhibits polarization. As a collection of countries, Africa is diverging from the rest of the world regardless of the weighting scheme.

Keywords

Polarization Convergence Overlap measure Trapezoid measure 

JEL Classification

C14 I32 O47 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anand S., Segal P. (2008) What do we know about global income inequality?. Journal of Economic Literature 46(1): 57–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson G. (2004a) Making inferences about the welfare poverty and polarization of nations: A study of 101 countries 1970–1995. Journal of Applied Econometrics 19: 537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson G. (2004b) Towards an empirical analysis of polarization. Journal of Econometrics 122: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson G. (2005) Life expectancy, welfare and inequality: The example of Africa in the 1990s. Review of Income and Wealth 51(3): 455–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, G., Crawford, I., & Leicester, A. (2010). Welfare rankings from multivariate data, a nonparametric approach. Journal of Public Economics, 95(3–4), 247–252. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.08.003.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, G., Linton, O., & Whang, Y.-J. (2009). Nonparametric estimation of a polarization measure. Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Mimeo.Google Scholar
  7. Barro R. J., Sala-i-Martin X. (1992) Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100(2): 223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaudry P., Collard F., Green D. A. (2005) Changes in the world distribution of output per capita 1960–1998: How a standard decomposition tells an unorthodox story. Review of Economics and Statistics 87(4): 741–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker G. S., Philipson T. J., Soares R. R. (2005) The quantity and quality of life and the evolution of world inequality. American Economic Review 95(1): 277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bianchi M. (1997) Testing for convergence: Evidence from non-parametric multimodality tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics 12(4): 393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourguignon F., Morrisson C. (2002) Inequality among world citizens: 1820–1992. American Economic Review 92(4): 727–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Browning M., Lusardi A. (1996) Household saving: Micro theories and micro facts. Journal of Economic Literature 34(4): 1797–1855Google Scholar
  13. Decancq K., Decoster A., Schokkaert E. (2009) The evolution of world inequality in well-being. World Development 37(1): 11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duclos J.-Y., Esteban J.-M., Ray D. (2004) Polarization: Concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica 72: 1737–1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Durlauf, S. N., & Fafchamps, M. (2005). Social capital. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1), Chap. 26. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Durlauf, S. N., & Quah, D. T. (1999). The new empirics of economic growth. In J. B. Taylor & M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of macroeconomics (Vol. 1), Chap. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  17. Durlauf, S. N., Johnson, P. A., & Temple, J. R. (2009). The econometrics of convergence. In T. C. Mills & K. Patterson (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of econometrics, Vol. 2 of Applied econometrics New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Eddy W. F. (1980) Optimum kernel estimators of the mode. The Annals of Statistics 8(4): 870–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esteban J.-M., Ray D. (1994) On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62(4): 819–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fleurbaey M. (2009) Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature 47(4): 1029–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fleurbaey M., Gaulier G. (2009) International comparisons of living standards by equivalent incomes. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 111(3): 597–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster, J. E., & Wolfson, M. C. (1992). Polarization and the decline of the middle class: Canada and the U.S. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Mimeo.Google Scholar
  23. Friedman M. (1957) A theory of the consumption function. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  24. Galor O. (1996) Convergence? Inferences from theoretical models. The Economic Journal 106(437): 1056–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartigan J. A., Hartigan P. M. (1985) The dip test of unimodality. Annals of Statistics 13: 70–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henderson D. J., Parmeter C. F., Russell R. (2008) Modes, weighted modes, and calibrated modes: Evidence of clustering using modality tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23(5): 607–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Islam N. (2003) What have we learnt from the convergence debate?. Journal of Economic Surveys 17(3): 309–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson P. A. (2000) A non-parametric analysis of income convergence across the US states. Economics Letters 69(2): 219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1994). Continuous univariate distributions, Vol. 1 of Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  30. Jones C. I. (1997) On the evolution of the world income distribution. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones, C. I., & Klenow, P. J. (2010). Beyond GDP? Welfare across countries and time. NBER Unpublished Working Paper No. 16352.Google Scholar
  32. Mankiw G., Romer D., Weil D. N. (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2): 407–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mann H., Wald A. (1943) On stochastic limit and order relationships. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 14(3): 217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Milanovic B. (2005) Worlds apart: Measuring international and global inequality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  35. Modigliani F., Brumberg R. (1954) Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data. In: Kurihara K. K. (eds) Post-Keynesian economics. Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, NJGoogle Scholar
  36. Nordhaus, W. D. (2002). The health of nations: The contribution of improved health to living standards. NBER Unpublished Working Paper No. 8818.Google Scholar
  37. Paap R., van Dijk H. K. (1998) Distribution and mobility of wealth of nations. European Economic Review 42(7): 135–165Google Scholar
  38. Pagan A., Ullah A. (1999) Nonparametric econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Pittau M. G., Zelli R. (2006) Empirical evidence of income dynamics across EU regions. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21(5): 605–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quah D. T. (1997) Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. Journal of Economic Growth 2(1): 27–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sala-i-Martin X. (2006) The world distribution of income: Falling poverty and . . . convergence, period. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2): 351–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Silverman B. W. (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  43. Temple J. (1999) The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature 37(1): 112–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolfson M. C. (1994) When inequalities diverge. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 84(2): 353–358Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityAntigonishCanada

Personalised recommendations