Abstract
While research and development (R&D) investment has been procyclical in the post-war period, recent literature suggests that the optimal path for R&D is countercyclical, and that the economy would be better off by subsidizing R&D in recessions. The objective of this paper is to analyze the welfare effects of distortions in the intertemporal allocation of R&D resources and to compare diverse policy interventions so as to improve social welfare. To this end, we introduce a calibrated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with Schumpeterian endogenous growth that is capable of explaining the observed procyclicality of R&D. Our results show that the cost of business cycles is lower in the decentralized economy with procyclical R&D than in the efficient allocation with countercyclical R&D. This is because the suboptimal propagation of shocks in the decentralized equilibrium offsets some of the existing steady-state distortions. In this second-best context, countercyclical R&D subsidies have no positive effect on welfare. In contrast, fiscal policies aimed at restoring the optimal steady-state produce large welfare gains.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2): 323–351
Aghion P., Howitt P. (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Aghion P., Saint-Paul G. (1998) Virtues of Bad Times: Interaction between productivity growth and economic fluctuations. Macroeconomic Dynamics 2(3): 322–344
Aghion, P., Angeletos, G.-M., Banerjee, A., & Manova, K. (2005). Volatility and growth: Credit constraints and productivity-enhancing investment. NBER Working Papers 11349, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Audretsch D. B. (1991) New-firm survival and the technological regime. The Review of Economics and Statistics 73(3): 441–450
Barlevy G. (2004) The cost of business cycles under endogenous growth. American Economic Review 94(4): 964–990
Barlevy G. (2007) On the cyclicality of research and development. American Economic Review 97(4): 1131–1164
Canova, F., & Ferroni, F. (2009). Multiple filtering devices for the estimation of cyclical DSGE models. Economics Working Papers 1135, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Chari V. V., Kehoe P. J., McGrattan E. R. (2009) New Keynesian models: Not yet useful for policy analysis. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1(1): 242–266
Christiano L. J., Eichenbaum M., Evans C. L. (2005) Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. Journal of Political Economy 113(1): 1–45
Comin D. (2004) R&D: A small contribution to productivity growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9(4): 391–421
Comin D., Gertler M. (2006) Medium-term business cycles. American Economic Review 96(3): 523–551
Dunne T., Roberts M. J., Samuelson L. (1988) Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries. RAND Journal of Economics 19(4): 495–515
Fatas A. (2000) Do business cycles cast long shadows? Short-run persistence and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth 5(2): 147–162
Francois P., Lloyd-Ellis H. (2009) Schumpeterian business cycles with pro-cyclical R&D. Review of Economic Dynamics 12(4): 567–591
Grossman G., Helpman E. (1991) Innovation and growth in the world economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Howitt P. (2000) Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences. American Economic Review 90(4): 829–846
Howitt P., Aghion P. (1998) Capital accumulation and innovation as complementary factors in long-run growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3(2): 111–130
Howitt P., Mayer-Foulkes D. (2005) R&D, implementation, and stagnation: A Schumpeterian theory of convergence clubs. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 37(1): 147–177
Jones C. I., Williams J. C. (1998) Measuring the social return to R&D. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4): 1119–1135
Jones C. I., Williams J. C. (2000) Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth 5(1): 65–85
Kortum S. (1993) Equilibrium R&D and the patent-R&D ratio: U.S. evidence. American Economic Review 83(2): 450–457
Kwan Y., Lai E. (2003) Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27(5): 853–873
Kydland F. E., Prescott E. C. (1982) Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 50(6): 1345–1370
Lipsey R., Lancaster K. (1956) The general theory of second best. The Review of Economic Studies 24(1): 11–32
Lucas R. (1987) Models of business cycles. Basil Blackwell, New York, NY
Nuño, G. (2010). Optimal research and development expenditure: A general equilibrium approach. Banco de España Working Papers 1009, Banco de España.
Porter, M., & Stern, S. (2000). Measuring the ‘Ideas’ production function: Evidence from international patent output. NBER Working paper 7891, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Romer P. M. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5): 71–102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nuño, G. Optimal research and development and the cost of business cycles. J Econ Growth 16, 257–283 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-011-9063-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-011-9063-4