Abstract
This paper offers micro-foundations for the dynamic relationship between technology and population in the pre-industrial world, accounting for both technological progress and the hitherto neglected but common phenomenon of technological regress. A positive feedback between population and the adoption of new techniques that increase the division of labor explains technological progress. A transient shock to productivity or population induces the neglect of some techniques rendered temporarily unprofitable, which are therefore not transmitted to the next generation. Productivity remains constrained by the smaller stock of knowledge and technology has thereby regressed. A slow process of rediscovery is required for the economy to reach its previous level of technological sophistication and population size. The model is employed to analyze specific historical examples of technological regress.
Inventions don’t just get adopted once and forever; they have to be constantly practised and transmitted, or useful techniques may be forgotten.
Jared Diamond, Ten Thousand Years of Solitude, 1993.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992) A model of rowth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–51
Arrow K. (1962) The economic implications of learning-by-doing. Review of Economic Studies 29: 155–73
Baker, M., (2007). A structural model of the neolithic revolution. Working Paper (Hunter College).
Biraben J.N. (1979) Essai sur l’evolution du nombre des hommes. Population 34: 13–25
Boserup E. (1965) The conditions of agricultural growth. Adeline Publishing Company, New York
Botticini, M., & Siow, A. (2005). The value of sons in pre-modern economies: A view from the marriage Market. Boston University.
Brander J., Taylor S. (1997) The simple economics of Easter Island: A Ricardo-Malthus model of renewable resource use. American Economic Review 88: 119–138
Cervellati M., Sunde U. (2005) Human capital formation, life expectancy and the process of development. American Economic Review 95: 1653–1672
Ciccone A., Hall R. (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review 86: 54–70
Clark, G., & Hamilton, G. (2004). Was pre-industrial society malthusian? Tests from England and New France. Working Paper, UC Davis.
Comin, D., Easterly, W., & Gong, E. (2006). Was the wealth of nations determined in 1000 B.C.? Working paper, New York University.
Cottrell L. (1964) The concise encyclopedia of archaeology (2nd ed). Hawthorn Books, New York
de la Croix D., Doepke M. (2003) Inequality and growth: Why differential fertility matters. American Economic Review 93: 1091–113
Delaine, J. (1997). The Baths of Caracalla in Rome: A study in the design, construction and economics of large-scale building projects in imperial Rome. Journal of Roman Archeology Supplement, 25 (Portsmouth R.I. 1997).
Diamond, J. (1993). Ten thousand years of solitude. Discover Magazine.
Diamond, J. (1995). Easter Island’s End. Discover Magazine.
Diamond J. (1997) Guns, germs and steel. W.W. Norton, New York
Diamond J. (2004) Collapse—how societies choose to fail or succeed. Penguin Books, New York
Doepke, M. (2002). Accounting for fertility decline during the transition to growth. UCLA working paper.
Eaton J., Kortum S. (1999) International technology diffusion: Theory and measurement. International Economic Review. 40: 537–70
Finley M.I. (1965) Technical innovation and economic progress in the ancient world. Economic History Review 18: 29–45
Fishman A., Simhon A. (2002) The division of labor, inequality and growth. Journal of Economic Growth 7: 117–136
Galor O. (2005) From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In: Aghion P., Durlauf S.(eds) Handbook of economic growth. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 171–293
Galor O., Moav O. (2002) Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 1133–1191
Galor O., Weil D. (2000) Population, technology and growth: From malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review 90: 806–828
Goodfriend M., McDermott J. (1995) Early development. American Economic Review 85: 116–33
Grantham G. (1999) Contra Ricardo: On the macroeconomics of pre-industrial economics. European Review of Economic History 2: 199–232
Greene K. (1990) Perspectives on Roman technology. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 22: 209–219
Greene K. (2000) Technical innovation and economic progress in the Ancient world: M.I. Finley re-considered. Economic History Review 53: 29–59
Grossman G., Helpman E. (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge
Hansen G., Prescott E. (2002) Malthus to Solow. American Economic Review 92: 1205–1217
Hazan, M., & Zoabi, H. (2004). Longevity, fertility and economic growth. Mimeo, Hebrew University.
Hoffman, P. (1996). Growth in a traditional society: The French country side 1440–1815. Princeton University Press.
Hong S., Candelone J.P., Burton C. (1994) Greenland ice evidence of hemispheric lead pollution two millennia ago by Greek and Roman civilization. Science 265: 246–249
Jones C.I. (2007) Growth and Ideas. In: Aghion P., Durlauf S.(eds) Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam, North Holland
Kelly M. (1997) The dynamics of smithian growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 939–964
Kelly, M. (2004). Living standards and population growth: Malthus was right. University College Dublin.
King R. (2000) Brunelleschi’s Dome. Penguin Books, New York
Kortum S. (1997) Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica 65: 1389–1419
Kremer M. (1993) Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 681–716
Lagerlof N.P. (2003) From Malthus to modern growth: Can epidemics explain the three regimes?. International Economic Review 44: 755–777
Livi-Bacci M. (1997) A Concise History of World population (2nd. ed). Blackwell, Oxford
Lucas, R. E. Jr. (Ed.). (2002). The industrial revolution: Past and future. In Lectures on economic growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Mainstone R. (1970) Brunelleschi’s dome of S. Maria del Fiore and some related structures. Transactions of the Newcomen Society 42: 107–126
Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena. Princeton University Press.
Nelson R.R., Phelps E.S. (1966) Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. American Economic Review 56: 69–75
Olsson O. (2000) Knowledge as a set in idea space: An epistemological view on growth. Journal of Economic Growth 5: 253–275
Phelps N. (1966) Models of technological progress and the golden rule of research. Review of Economic Studies 33: 133–145
Romer P. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102
Simon J., Sullivan R.J. (1989) Population size, knowledge stock, and other determinants of agricultural publication and pateting: England, 1541–1850. Explorations in Economic History 26: 21–44
Sorokin P.A. (1962) Social and Cultural Dynamics (Vol II) 2nd edn. The Bedminster Press, New York
Temin P. (2006) The economy of the early Roman empire.Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 133–151
Tilburg J.A.V., Ralston T. (2005) Megaliths and Mariners: Experimental archaeology on Easter Island. In: Johnson K.L.(eds) Onward and upward: Essays in Honor of Clement W. Meighan. University Press of America, Lanham, MD
Weitzman M. (1998) Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 331–360
Wilson A. (2002) Machines, power and the ancient economy. The Journal of Roman Studies 92: 1–32
Wilson, A. (2006). The economic impact of technological advances in the Roman construction industry. In E. Lo Cascio (Ed.), Innovazione tecnica e progresso economico nel mondo romano. (Pragmateiai) (pp. 225–236.). Bari, Edipuglia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aiyar, S., Dalgaard, CJ. & Moav, O. Technological progress and regress in pre-industrial times. J Econ Growth 13, 125–144 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-008-9030-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-008-9030-x