Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Manhattan Metaphor

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fixed operating costs draw a sharp distinction between endogenous growth based on horizontal and vertical innovation: a larger number of product lines puts pressure on an economy’s resources; greater productivity of existing product lines does not. Consequently, the only plausible engine of endogenous growth is vertical innovation whereby progress along the quality or cost ladder does not require the replication of fixed costs. Is, then, product variety expansion irrelevant? No. The two dimensions of technology are complementary in that using one and the other produces a more comprehensive theory of economic growth. The vertical dimension allows endogenous growth unconstrained by endowments, the horizontal provides the mechanism that translates changes in aggregate variables into changes in product-level variables, which ultimately drive incentives to push the technological frontier in the vertical dimension. We show that the potential for exponential growth due to an externality that makes entry costs fall linearly with the number of products, combined with the limited carrying capacity of the system due to fixed operating costs, yields logistic dynamics for the number of products. This desirable property allows us to provide a closed-form solution for the model’s transition path and thereby derive analytically the welfare effects of changes in parameters and policy variables. Our Manhattan Metaphor illustrates conceptually why we obtain this mathematical representation when we simply add fixed operating costs to the standard modeling of variety expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P., Howitt P. (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks R. (1994) Growth and diffusion phenomena. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro R., Sala-i-Martin X. (2004) Economic growth. MIT University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly M., Peretto P.F. (2003) Industry and the family: Two engines of growth. Journal of Economic Growth 8: 115–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzi, G., & Spinesi, L. (2002). Quasi-fixed costs and the returns to innovation. Manuscript, University of Rome “La Sapienza”.

  • Etro F. (2004) Innovation by leaders. Economic Journal 114, 281–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G.M., Helpman E. (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha J., Howitt P. (2007) Accounting for trends in productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian critique of semi-endogenous growth theory. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 38(4): 733–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt P. (1999) Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy 107: 715–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laincz C., Peretto P.F. (2006) Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: An error of aggregation, not specification. Journal of Economic Growth 11: 263–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, A. (2006). Multi-product firms, R&D, and growth. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 6(3), (Topics).

  • Peretto P.F. (1996) Sunk costs, market structure and growth. International Economic Review 37: 895–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretto P.F. (1998) Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3: 283–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretto, P. F. (2007a). Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming.

  • Peretto, P. F. (2007b). Schumpeterian growth with productive public spending and distortionary taxation. Review of Development Economics, forthcoming.

  • Peretto, P. F. (2007c). Energy taxes and endogenous technological change. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Duke University.

  • Peretto P.F., Smulders S. (2002) Technological distance, growth, and scale effects. The Economic Journal 112: 603–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P. (1987) Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 77: 56–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smulders S., van de Klundert T. (1995) Imperfect competition, concentration and growth with firm-specific R&D. European Economic Review 39: 139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro F. Peretto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peretto, P.F., Connolly, M. The Manhattan Metaphor. J Econ Growth 12, 329–350 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9023-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9023-1

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation