Abstract
Modern Schumpeterian growth theory focuses on the product line as the main locus of innovation and exploits endogenous product proliferation to sterilize the scale effect. The empirical core of this theory consists of two claims: (i) growth depends on average employment (i.e., employment per product line); (ii) average employment is scale invariant. We show that data on employment, R&D personnel, and the number of establishments in the US for the period 1964–2001 provide strong support for these claims. While employment and the total number of R&D workers increase with no apparent matching change in the long-run trend of productivity growth, employment and R&D employment per establishment exhibit no long-run trend. We also document that the number of establishments, employment and population exhibit a positive trend, while the ratio employment/establishment does not. Finally, we provide results of time series tests consistent with the predictions of these models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams J., Jaffe A. (1996). Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data. RAND Journal of Economics, 27, 700–721
Aghion P., Howitt P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351
Aghion P., Howitt P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Aghion P., Howitt P. (2005). Growth with quality improving innovations: An integrated framework. In: Aghion P., Durlauf S.S. (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam, North Holland
Aghion P., Harris C., Howitt P., Vickers J. (2001). Competition, imitation, and growth with step-by-step innovation. Review of Economic Studies, 68, 467–492
Backus D., Kehoe P., Kehoe T. (1992). In search of scale effects in trade and growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 58, 377–409
Barro R., Sala-i-Martin X. (2004). Economic growth. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Ben-David D., Papell D. (1995). The great wars, the great crash, and steady state growth: Some new evidence about an old stylized fact. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 453–475
Broda C., Weinstein D. (2006). Globalization and the gains from variety. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 541–585
Cohen W., Klepper S. (1996). A Reprise of Size and R&D. The Economic Journal, 106, 925–951
Dinopoulos E., Thompson P. (1998). Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 313–335
Dinopoulos E., Thompson P. (1999). Scale effects in schumpeterian models of economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9, 157–185
Dunne T., Roberts M.J., Samuelson L. (1988). Patterns of Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries. RAND Journal of Economics, 19, 495–515
Feenstra R.C. (1994). New product varieties and the measurement of international prices. American Economic Review, 84, 157–177
Galor O. (2005). From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In: Aghion P., Durlauf S. (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam, North Holland
Geweke J., Meese R. (1981). Estimating regression models of finite but unknown order. International Economic Review, 22, 55–70
Grossman G.M., Helpman E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Ha, J., & Howitt, P. (2006) Accounting for trends in productivity and R&D: A schumpeterian critique of semi-endogenous growth theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking(forthcoming).
Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2001). Penn world table version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP).
Howitt P. (1999). Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715–730
Jones C.I. (1995a). Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 495–525
Jones C.I. (1995b). R&D-based models of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 759–784
Jones C.I. (1999). Growth: With or without scale effects?. Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Eleventh Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 89, 139–144
Jones C.I. (2005). Growth and ideas. In: Aghion P., Durlauf S. (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam, North Holland
Kelley A.C., Schmidt R. (2003). Economic and demographic change: a synthesis of models, findings, and perspectives. In: Birdsall N., Kelley A.C., Sinding S. (eds) Population matters—demographic change, economic growth, and poverty in the developing world. New York, Oxford University Press
Klenow P., Bils M. (2001). The acceleration in variety growth. American economic Review, 91,274–280
Klenow P., Rodríguez-Clare A. (2005). Externalities and growth. In: Aghion P., Durlauf S. (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam, North Holland
Klette T.J., Kortum S. (2004). Innovating firms and aggregate innovation. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 986–1018
Kocherlakota N., Yi K. (1997). Is there endogenous long-run growth? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29, 235–262
Kortum S. (1997). Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica, 65, 1389–1419
Kremer M. (1993). Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 681–716
Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P.C.B., Schmidt P., Shin Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic series have a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159–178
Laincz C. (2005). Market structure and endogenous productivity growth: How do R&D subsidies affect market structure?”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29, 187–223
Pagano P., Schivardi F. (2003). Firm size distribution and growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105, 255–274
Peretto P. (1996). Sunk costs, market structure, and growth. International Economic Review, 37, 895–923
Peretto P. (1998). Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283–311
Peretto P. (1999). Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics. 43, 173–195
Peretto P. (2003). Fiscal policy and long-run growth in R&D-based models with endogenous market structure. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 325–347
Peretto, P., & Connolly, M., (2004). The manhattan metaphor. working paper, Duke University.
Peretto P., Smulders S. (2002). Technological distance, growth, and scale effects. The Economic Journal, 112, 603–624
Porter, M. & Stern, S. (2000). Measuring the “Ideas” production function: Evidence from international patent output. NBER Working Paper #7891.
Romer P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037
Romer P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98:S71–S102
Segerstrom P. (1998). Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review, 88, 1290–1310
Smulders S., van de Klundert T. (1995). Imperfect competition, concentration and growth with firm-specific R&D. European Economic Review, 39, 139–160
Thompson P. (2001). The microeconomic structure of R&D based models of economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 263–283
Young A. (1998). Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 41–63
Zachariadis M. (2003). R&D, innovation, and technological progress: A test of the schumpeterian framework without scale effects. Canadian Journal of Economics, 36, 566–586
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laincz, C.A., Peretto, P.F. Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: an error of aggregation not specification. J Econ Growth 11, 263–288 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9004-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9004-9