Skip to main content
Log in

Divergent Response of Two Bark Beetle–Fungal Symbiotic Systems to Host Monoterpenes Reflects Niche Partitioning Strategies

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The successful establishment of bark beetle–fungus symbionts on plants is required to overcome host defenses. However, little is known about how different bark beetle–fungus symbionts adapt to different niches on the same host plant. Here, we investigated the niche partitioning mechanism of two co-occurring bark beetle–fungus symbiotic systems, Ips nitidusOphiostoma bicolor and Dendroctonus micansEndoconidiophora laricicola, on Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) tree. The lower niche of the spruce trunk inhabited by D. micans showed a higher content of monoterpenes than the upper niche of the trunk inhabited by I. nitidus. Dendroctonus micans showed greater tolerance and higher metabolic efficiency toward monoterpenes than I. nitidus. However, both beetle species showed a similar metabolic profile toward α-pinene, albeit with different levels of metabolites. Additionally, O. bicolor, transmitted by I. nitidus, showed a significantly higher tolerance to monoterpenes and pathogenicity to spruce trees than E. laricicola, transmitted by D. micans. In particular, monoterpenoid metabolites were observed to attenuate the inhibitory effect of high-dose α-pinene on E. laricicola, thus increasing its fitness in a high-dose monoterpene microhabitat. These results show that these two bark beetle–fungus symbionts have adapted to different niches, leading to fitness differences in niche distribution that are at least partly related to the different distribution of monoterpene concentration in the spruce trunk. This research provides a novel perspective for understanding the coevolution between bark beetle–fungus symbionts and their host plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data generated and analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the anonymous reviewers and subject editor for their constructive comments and help with revising this manuscript. We would also like to thank Nanjie Wanma and Jianyuan Ma (Maixiu Forest Farm of Huangnan Prefecture) for their assistance with fieldwork.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project no. 32301601).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XBK and JXF conceived the research. ZZB and JXF performed toxicological tests and chemical analyses, analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. FL synthesized the chemical standards. JXF, ZZB, CMY, FZH, GRZ and JHM carried out the field work. XBK and SFZ revised the manuscript and provided constructive comments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiaxing Fang or Xiangbo Kong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bai, Z., Fang, J., Yu, C. et al. Divergent Response of Two Bark Beetle–Fungal Symbiotic Systems to Host Monoterpenes Reflects Niche Partitioning Strategies. J Chem Ecol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-024-01535-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-024-01535-5

Keywords

Navigation