Attraction of the Green Lacewing Chrysoperla comanche (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to Yeast
- 233 Downloads
Many adult Chrysoperla comanche (Stephens) green lacewings were caught in traps baited with live yeast cultures during tests designed to catch olive fruit flies. All 13 yeast species tested were more attractive than the industry-standard dried torula yeast (Cyberlindnera jadinii; syn. Candida utilis). Live C. jadinii culture attracted significantly more lacewings than the inactive dried-pellet form of the same yeast species, demonstrating that volatiles from live yeast cultures attract adults of this lacewing. Odor profiles for two of the highly active yeasts tested herein (Lachancea thermotolerans and Solicoccozyma terrea) were similar to that for Metschnikowia pulcherrima, a yeast species isolated earlier from the gut diverticulum of Chrysoperla rufilabris. A new Metschnikowia species (M. chrysoperlae), along with two new Candida spp. that were recently realigned to one of the Metschnikowia clades (M. picachoensis and M. pimensis), were also identified from the diverticulum of C. comanche. Thus, one clade of Metschnikowia yeasts that commonly occur in floral nectar appears to exhibit mutualistic symbioses with Chrysoperla green lacewings. Both male and female C. comanche adults were attracted in the present study, and we speculate that males have exploited this symbiosis by offering Metschnikowia-laden regurgitant, including attractive volatiles, to females (‘mating trophallaxis’) as a nuptial gift.
KeywordsAttraction Trophallaxis Symbiosis Mutualism Metschnikowia Torula Reproduction
This research was supported by a Fulbright Scholarship 2015/2016 to one of us (EV), for “Understanding the multi-trophic association of olive fruit, yeast and olive fruit fly (Bactrocera oleae, Rossi) with possible implications for pest management,” and by the Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis. Many thanks to Nikki Nicola for technical help, and we thank Dan Flynn for access to UC Davis Olive Center orchards for this study.
- Hagen K, Tassan R, Sawall EF Jr (1970) Some ecophysiological relationships between certain Chrysopa, honeydews and yeasts. Boll Lab Entomol Agrar Portici 28:113–134Google Scholar
- Sobhy IS, Baets D, Goelen T, Herrera-Malaver B, Bosmans L, Van den Ende W, Verstrepen KJ, Wäckers F, Jacquemyn H, Lievens B (2018) Sweet scents: nectar specialist yeasts enhance nectar attraction of a generalist aphid parasitoid without affecting survival. Front Plant Sci 9:1009. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Suh S-O, Gibson CM, Blackwell M (2004) Metschnikowia chrysoperlae sp. nov., Candida picachoensis sp. nov. and Candida pimensis sp. nov., isolated from the green lacewings Chrysoperla comanche and Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1883–1890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Woolfolk S, Cohen A, Inglis G (2004) Morphology of the alimentary canal of Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) adults in relation to microbial symbionts. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:796–808Google Scholar