Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 388–391 | Cite as

Attraction of the Green Lacewing Chrysoperla comanche (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to Yeast

  • Elda Vitanović
  • Jeffrey R. AldrichEmail author
  • Shaun L. Winterton
  • Kyria Boundy-Mills
  • Julian M. Lopez
  • Frank G. Zalom
Rapid Communications
  • 233 Downloads

Abstract

Many adult Chrysoperla comanche (Stephens) green lacewings were caught in traps baited with live yeast cultures during tests designed to catch olive fruit flies. All 13 yeast species tested were more attractive than the industry-standard dried torula yeast (Cyberlindnera jadinii; syn. Candida utilis). Live C. jadinii culture attracted significantly more lacewings than the inactive dried-pellet form of the same yeast species, demonstrating that volatiles from live yeast cultures attract adults of this lacewing. Odor profiles for two of the highly active yeasts tested herein (Lachancea thermotolerans and Solicoccozyma terrea) were similar to that for Metschnikowia pulcherrima, a yeast species isolated earlier from the gut diverticulum of Chrysoperla rufilabris. A new Metschnikowia species (M. chrysoperlae), along with two new Candida spp. that were recently realigned to one of the Metschnikowia clades (M. picachoensis and M. pimensis), were also identified from the diverticulum of C. comanche. Thus, one clade of Metschnikowia yeasts that commonly occur in floral nectar appears to exhibit mutualistic symbioses with Chrysoperla green lacewings. Both male and female C. comanche adults were attracted in the present study, and we speculate that males have exploited this symbiosis by offering Metschnikowia-laden regurgitant, including attractive volatiles, to females (‘mating trophallaxis’) as a nuptial gift.

Keywords

Attraction Trophallaxis Symbiosis Mutualism Metschnikowia Torula Reproduction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Fulbright Scholarship 2015/2016 to one of us (EV), for “Understanding the multi-trophic association of olive fruit, yeast and olive fruit fly (Bactrocera oleae, Rossi) with possible implications for pest management,” and by the Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis. Many thanks to Nikki Nicola for technical help, and we thank Dan Flynn for access to UC Davis Olive Center orchards for this study.

References

  1. Aldrich JR, Zhang Q-H (2016) Chemical ecology of Neuroptera. Annu Rev Entomol 61:197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becher PG, Flick G, Rozpędowska E, Schmidt A, Hagman A, Lebreton S, Larsson MC, Hansson BS, Piškur J, Witzgall P (2012) Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and development. Funct Ecol 26:822–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becher PG, Hagman A, Verschut V, Chakraborty A, Rozpędowska E, Lebreton S, Bengtsson M, Flick G, Witzgall P, Piškur J (2018) Chemical signaling and insect attraction is a conserved trait in yeasts. Ecol Evol 8:2962–2974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gamero A, Quintilla R, Groenewald M, Alkema W, Boekhout T, Hazelwood L (2016) High-throughput screening of a large collection of non-conventional yeasts reveals their potential for aroma formation in food fermentation. Food Microbiol 60:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibson CM, Hunter MS (2005) Reconsideration of the role of yeasts associated with Chrysoperla green lacewings. Biol Control 32:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guzmán B, Lachance M-A, Herrera CM (2013) Phylogenetic analysis of the angiosperm-floricolous insect–yeast association: have yeast and angiosperm lineages co-diversified? Mol Phylogenet Evol 68:161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hagen K, Tassan R, Sawall EF Jr (1970) Some ecophysiological relationships between certain Chrysopa, honeydews and yeasts. Boll Lab Entomol Agrar Portici 28:113–134Google Scholar
  8. Hamby KA, Hernández A, Boundy-Mills K, Zalom FG (2012) Associations of yeasts with spotted-wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii; Diptera: Drosophilidae) in cherries and raspberries. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4869–4873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ, Basehoar E, Ward TJ (2018) Four new species of Metschnikowia and the transfer of seven Candida species to Metschnikowia and Clavispora as new combinations. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 111:2017–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sobhy IS, Baets D, Goelen T, Herrera-Malaver B, Bosmans L, Van den Ende W, Verstrepen KJ, Wäckers F, Jacquemyn H, Lievens B (2018) Sweet scents: nectar specialist yeasts enhance nectar attraction of a generalist aphid parasitoid without affecting survival. Front Plant Sci 9:1009.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Suh S-O, Gibson CM, Blackwell M (2004) Metschnikowia chrysoperlae sp. nov., Candida picachoensis sp. nov. and Candida pimensis sp. nov., isolated from the green lacewings Chrysoperla comanche and Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1883–1890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Woolfolk SW, Inglis GD (2004) Microorganisms associated with field-collected Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) adults with emphasis on yeast symbionts. Biol Control 29:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Woolfolk S, Cohen A, Inglis G (2004) Morphology of the alimentary canal of Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) adults in relation to microbial symbionts. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:796–808Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied ScienceInstitute for Adriatic Crops and Karst ReclamationSplitCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Entomology and NematologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  3. 3.Jeffrey R. Aldrich Consulting LLCMarcellUSA
  4. 4.California Department of Food and AgricultureCalifornia State Collection of ArthropodsSacramentoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Food Science and Technology, Phaff Yeast CollectionUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations