History Matters: Oviposition Resource Acceptance in an Exploiter of a Nursery Pollination Mutualism
- 212 Downloads
In the fig–fig wasp nursery pollination system, parasitic wasps, such as gallers and parasitoids that oviposit from the exterior into the fig syconium (globular, enclosed inflorescence) are expected to use a variety of chemical cues for successful location of their hidden hosts. Behavioral assays were performed with freshly eclosed naive galler wasps. Syconia with different oviposition histories, i.e. with or without prior oviposition, were presented to wasps in no-choice assays and the time taken to the first oviposition attempt was recorded. The wasps exhibited a preference for syconia previously exposed to conspecifics for oviposition over unexposed syconia. Additionally, syconia exposed to oviposition by heterospecific wasps were also preferred for oviposition over unexposed syconia indicating that wasps recognise and respond to interspecific cues. Wasps also aggregated for oviposition on syconia previously exposed to oviposition by conspecifics. We investigated chemical cues that wasps may employ in accepting an oviposition resource by analyzing syconial volatile profiles, chemical footprints left by wasps on syconia, and syconial surface hydrocarbons. The volatile profile of a syconium is influenced by the identity of wasps developing within and may be used to identify suitable host syconia at long range whereas close range preference seems to exploit wasp footprints that alter syconium surface hydrocarbon profiles. These cues act as indicators of the oviposition history of the syconium, thereby helping wasps in their oviposition decisions.
KeywordsAggregation Fig wasps Footprints Host acceptance Pollinator Hydrocarbons Volatile organic compounds Herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) Floral volatiles (E)-β-ocimene Methyl salicylate
This work was supported by funds from the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, the Department of Biotechnology, and the Department of Science and Technology-FIST, Government of India. We thank the Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research (IFCPAR) for supporting JMB’s travel. We thank Anusha Kumble and G Yathiraj for help in field work.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Borges RM (2015b) How mutualisms between plant and insects are stabilized. Curr Sci 108:1862–1868Google Scholar
- Borges RM (2016) On the air: broadcasting and reception of volatile messages in brood-site pollination mutualisms. In: Blande J, Glinwood R (eds) Deciphering chemical language of plant communication. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 227–255Google Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara BR, Simpsons GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. Version 2.0–7. http://cran.r-project.org
- Proffit M, Schatz B, Bessière J-M, Chen C, Soler C, Hossaert-McKey M (2008) Signalling receptivity: comparison of the emission of volatile compounds by figs of Ficus hispida before, during and after the phase of receptivity to pollinators. Symbiosis 45:15–24Google Scholar
- Wang RW, Zheng Q (2008) Structure of a fig wasp community: temporal segregation of oviposition and larval diets. Symbiosis 45:113–116Google Scholar
- Yadav P, Borges RM (2017b) Host–parasitoid development and survival strategies in a non-pollinating fig wasp community. Acta Oecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2017.04.001