Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal Variation of White Rhino Dung Odours

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Author Correction to this article was published on 08 March 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

In order for an olfactory signal to be effective, it must persist in the environment for an extended period. White rhino dung odours transmit information about sex, age, territorial and oestrous states. As these odours relay important information, temporal changes in the odour emission rate and/or composition may be critical in order for other individuals to obtain this information. Here, we examine how the dung odours of adult white rhinos (male: territorial and non-territorial; female: oestrous and non-oestrous) change over the short (hours) and long (seasons) term using headspace extraction. Additionally, we measure seasonal midden visitation and defecation frequency to link behaviours to seasonal changes in odour longevity. We found that during the dry season, territorial male dung odours persisted for 48 hours, while the odours of all other adults persisted for >48 hours. The high temperature and humidity of the wet season did not affect odour longevity of oestrous females, but decreased dung odour longevity (i.e. increased emission) of territorial males, non-territorial males, and non-oestrous females. Despite this reduction, neither males nor females adjusted their seasonal visitation or defecation frequency. With regard to a temporal indicator, 3,7-dimethly-1,6-octadiene signalled dung age during the wet season, while acetophenone signalled dung age during the dry season. Ultimately, our results provide the first detailed account of temporal changes of dung VOCs, and highlight the limitations of dung as a signalling medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 08 March 2019

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained some mistakes.

  • 08 March 2019

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained some mistakes.

References

  • Amirav A, Dagan S (1997) A direct sample introduction device for mass spectrometry studies and gas chromatorgraphy mass spectrometry anlyses. Eur J Mass Spectr 3:105–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Archunan G, Rajagopal T (2013) Detection of estrus in Indian blackbuck: Behavioural, hormonal and urinary volatiles evaluation. Gen Comp Endocrinol 181:156–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp GK, Berüter J (1973) Source and stability of attractive components in guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) urine. Behav Biol 9:43–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brachares JS, Arcese P (1999) Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: II. The economics of marking with faeces. Anim Behav 57:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buesching CD, Waterhouse JS, Macdonald DW (2002) Gas-chromatographic analyses of the subcaudal gland secretion of the European badger (Meles meles) part II: time-related variation in the individual-specific composition. J Chem Ecol 28:57–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buesching CD, Tinnesand HV, Sin Y, Rosell F, Burke T, Macdonald DW (2016) Coding of Group Odor in the Subcaudal Gland Secretion of the European Badger Meles meles: Chemical Composition and Pouch Microbiota. In: Schulte BA, Goodwin TE, Ferkin MH (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 13. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 45–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Darden SK, Steffensen LK, Dabelsteen T (2008) Information transfer among widely spaced individuals: latrines as a basis for communication networks in the swift fox? Anim Behav 75:425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM (1982) A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Z Tierpsychol 60:89–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM, Roberts SC (2001a) Scent-marking by male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Adv Study Behav 30:169–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM, Roberts SC (2001b) Testing ideas about the function of scent marks in territories from spatial patterns. Anim Behav 62:F7–F10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman-Smith AKK, Owen-Smith N, Anderson JL, Hall-Martin AJ, Selaladi JP (1986) Age estimation of the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum). J Zool 210:355–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst JL, Robertson DHL, Tolladay U, Beynon RJ (1998) Proteins in urine scent marks of male house mice extend the longevity of olfactory signals. Anim Behav 55:1289–1297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RE, Schmidt T (1979) Responses of hamsters to scent marks of different ages. Behav Neural Biol 26:64–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kretzschmar P (2002) Ecological, endocrinological and ethological investigations of female mate choice in free-ranging white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum): Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald

  • Kwak J, Willse A, Matsumura K, Opiekun M, Yi W, Preti G, Yamazaki K, Beauchamp G (2008) Genetically-based olfactory signatures persist despite dietary variation. PLoS One 3:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclaire S, Nielsen JF, Drea CM (2014) Bacterial communities in meerkat anal scent secretions vary with host sex, age, and group membership. Behav Ecol 24:996–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw A, Wiener M (2012) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann H (1982) African rhinoceroses in captivity. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunt N, Mhlanga MR (2011) Defecation rate variability in the common duiker: importance of food quality, season, sex and age. S Afr J Wildl Res 41:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydell K, Doty RL (1972) Male rat odor preferences for female urine as a function of sexual experience, urine age, and urine source. Horm Behav 3:205–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald E, Fernandez-Duque E, Evans S, Hagey L (2008) Sex, age, and family differences in the chemical composition of owl monkey (Aotus nancymaae) subcaudal scent secretions. Amer J Primatology 70:12–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marneweck C, Jürgens A, Shrader AM (2017) Dung odours signal sex, age, territorial and oestrous state in white rhinos. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 284:20162376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marneweck D, Cameron EZ, Ganswind A, Dalerum F (2015) Behavioural and endocrine correlates to the aardwolf mating system. Mammalian Biol 80:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín J, López P (2013) Effects of global warming on sensory ecology of rock lizards: increased temperatures alter the efficacy of sexual chemical signals. Funct Ecol 27:1332–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimmermark S, Gustafsson G (2005) Influence of temperature, humidity and ventilation rate on the release of odor and ammonia in a floor housing system for laying hens. Agric Eng Int 7:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira DGR, Macedo RH (2010) Functional context of scent-marking in Callithrix penicillata. Folia Primatol 81:73–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osbourn AE, Lanzotti V (2009) Plant-derived Natural Products: Synthesis, Function, and Application. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N (1971) Territoriality in the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) Burchell. Nature 231:294–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N (1973) The behavioural ecology of the white rhinoceros. University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N (1988) Megaherbivores. The influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peñuelas J, Llusià J (2001) The complexity of factors driving volatile organic compound emissions by plants. Biol Plant 44:481–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team RC (2015) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects model. R package version 3:1–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K, Smith DA (2004) Latrine use by San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) and coyotes (Canis latrans). W North Amer Nat 64:544–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnier FE, Goodwin M (1977) On the chemical and environmental modulation of pheromone release from vertebrate scent marks. In: Müller-Schwarze D, Mozell MM (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Springer US, New York, pp 115–133

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SC (1998) Behavioural responses to scent marks of increasing age in klipspringer Oreotragus oreotragus. Ethology 104:585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper TJ, Conradt L, Butler J, Christian SE, Ostler J, Schmid TK (1993) Territorial marking with faeces in badgers (Meles meles): a comparison of boundary and hinterland latrine use. Behaviour 127:289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader AM, Owen-Smith N, Ogutu JO (2006) How a mega-grazer copes with the dry season: food and nutrient intake rates by white rhinoceros in the wild. Funct Ecol 20:376–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart DM (1976) Mammalian odours and pheromones. Edward Arnold Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffel MA, Caspers BA, Forcada J, Giannakara A, Baier M, Eberhart-Phillips L, Muller C, Hoffman JI (2015) Chemical fingerprints encode mother-offspring similarity, colony membership, relatedness, and genetic quality in fur seals. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 112:E5005–E5012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van der Goot AC, Martin GB, Millar RP, Paris MC, Ganswindt A (2015) Profiling patterns of fecal 20-oxopregnane concentrations during ovarian cycles in free-ranging southern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum). Anim Reprod Sci 161:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verheggen FJ, Haubruge E, Mescher MC (2010) Alarm pheromones: chemical signaling in response to danger. Vitam Horm 83:215–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White AM, Swaisgood R, Czekala N (2007) Ranging patterns in white rhinoceros, Ceratotherium simum simum: implications for mating strategies. Anim Behav 74:349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JK, Kessler A, Woods HA (2015) Noisy Communication via Airborne Infochemicals. Bioscience 65:667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zala SM, Potts WK, Penn DJ (2004) Scent-marking displays provide honest signals of health and infection. Behav Ecol 15:338–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Adam Shuttleworth for processing GC-MS samples, Chris Kelly (WildlifeACT Fund) for use of camera traps, and the University of KwaZulu-Natal Gay Langmuir Bursary for Wildlife Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtney Marneweck.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 169 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marneweck, C., Jürgens, A. & Shrader, A.M. Temporal Variation of White Rhino Dung Odours. J Chem Ecol 43, 955–965 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-017-0890-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-017-0890-4

Keywords

Navigation