Skip to main content
Log in

Messages from the Other Side: Parasites Receive Damage Cues from their Host Plants

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As sessile organisms, plants rely on their environment for cues indicating imminent herbivory. These cues can originate from tissues on the same plant or from different individuals. Since parasitic plants form vascular connections with their host, parasites have the potential to receive cues from hosts that allow them to adjust defenses against future herbivory. However, the role of plant communication between hosts and parasites for herbivore defense remains poorly investigated. Here, we examined the effects of damage to lupine hosts (Lupinus texensis) on responses of the attached hemiparasite (Castilleja indivisa), and indirectly, on a specialist herbivore of the parasite, buckeyes (Junonia coenia). Lupines produce alkaloids that act as defenses against herbivores that can be taken up by the parasite. We found that damage to lupine host plants by beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) significantly increased jasmonic acid (JA) levels in both the lupine host and parasite, suggesting uptake of phytohormones or priming of parasite defenses by using host cues. However, lupine host damage did not induce changes in alkaloid levels in the hosts or parasites. Interestingly, the parasite had substantially higher concentrations of JA and alkaloids compared to lupine host plants. Buckeye herbivores consumed more parasite tissue when attached to damaged compared to undamaged hosts. We hypothesize that increased JA due to lupine host damage induced higher iridoid glycosides in the parasite, which are feeding stimulants for this specialist herbivore. Our results demonstrate that damage to hosts may affect both parasites and associated herbivores, indicating cascading effects of host damage on multiple trophic levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler LS (2000) Alkaloid uptake increases fitness in a hemiparasitic plant via reduced herbivory and increased pollination. Am Nat 156:92–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adler LS (2002) Host effects on herbivory and pollination in a hemiparasitic plant. Ecology 83:2700–2710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler LS, Wink M (2001) Transfer of quinolizidine alkaloids from hosts to hemiparasites in two Castilleja-Lupinus associations: analysis of floral and vegetative tissues. Biochem Syst Ecol 29:551–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adler LS, Karban R, Strauss SY (2001) Direct and indirect effects of alkaloids on plant fitness via herbivory and pollination. Ecology 82:2032–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (1999) Induced responses to herbivory in wild radish: effects on several herbivores and plant fitness. Ecology 80:1713–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MD (1984) Iridoid glycosides and host-plant specificity in larvae of the buckeye butterfly, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae. J Chem Ecol 10:1567–1577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cabezas NJ, Urzua AM, Niemeyer HM (2009) Translocation of isoquinoline alkaloids to the hemiparasite, Tristerix verticillatus from its host, Berberis montana. Biochem Syst Ecol 37:225–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM (1995) Positive interactions among plants. Bot Rev 61:306–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chludil HD, Vilarino MD, Franco ML, Leicach SR (2009) Changes in Lupinus albus and Lupinus angustifolius alkaloid profiles in response to mechanical damage. J Agric Food Chem 57:6107–6113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chludil HD, Leicach SR, Corbino GB, Barriga LG, Vilarino MD (2013) Genistin and quinolizidine alkaloid induction in L. angustifolius aerial parts in response to mechanical damage. J Plant Interact 8:117–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erb M, Robert CAM, Hibbard BE, Turlings TCJ (2011) Sequence of arrival determines plant-mediated interactions between herbivores. J Ecol 99:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. The Univeristy of Chicago Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Myers JH (1989) Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:331–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Baldwin IT, Baxter KJ, Laue G, Felton GW (2000) Communication between plants: induced resistance in wild tobacco plants following clipping of neighboring sagebrush. Oecologia 125:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Shiojiri K, Huntzinger M, McCall AC (2006) Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: volatiles are key to intra- and interplant communication. Ecology 87:922–930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Shiojiri K, Ishizaki S, Wetzel WC, Evans RY (2013) Kin recognition affects plant communication and defence. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 280:5

  • Karban R, Wetzel WC, Shiojiri K, Ishizaki S, Ramirez SR, Blande JD (2014) Deciphering the language of plant communication: volatile chemotypes of sagebrush. New Phytol 204:380–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijt J (1969) The biology of parasitic flowering plants, illustrated edn. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattanzio V, Lattanzio VMT, Cardinali A (2006) Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects. Phytochemistry. Adv Dent Res 661:23–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen P, Helander M, Wink M, Sporer F, Saikkonen K (2005) Transfer of endophyte-origin defensive alkaloids from a grass to a hemiparasitic plant. Ecol Lett 8:1256–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughmiller C, La L, Sherrod L (1984) Texas wildflowers: A field guide. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvier MA (1996) Parasitic plant-host interactions: plant performance and indirect effects on parasite-feeding herbivores. Ecology 77:1398–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marvier MA (1998) A mixed diet improves performance and herbivore resistance of a parasitic plant. Ecology 79:1272–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithöfer A, Boland W (2012) Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:431–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller DA (2004) Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology 85:3289–3301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nykanen H, Koricheva J (2004) Damage-induced changes in woody plants and their effects on insect herbivore performance: a meta-analysis. Oikos 104:247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer TM, Stanton ML, Young TP (2003) Competition and coexistence: exploring mechanisms that restrict and maintain diversity within mutualist guilds. Am Nat 162:S63–S79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix GK, Press MC (2005) Linking physiological traits to impacts on community structure and function: the role of root hemiparasitic Orobanchaceae (ex-scrophulariaceae. J Ecol 93:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poelman EH, Broekgaarden C, Van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2008) Early season herbivore differentially affects plant defence responses to subsequently colonizing herbivores and their abundance in the field. Mol Ecol 17:3352–3365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Press MC, Graves JD (1995) Parasitic plants. First edn. Chapman & Hall. 2–6 Boundary Row, London SE1 8HN

    Google Scholar 

  • R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2014) R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Reference Source.

  • Runyon JB, Mescher MC, De Moraes CM (2008) Parasitism by Cuscuta pentagona attenuates host plant defenses against insect herbivores. Plant Physiol 146:987–995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Runyon JB, Mescher MC, Felton GW, De Moraes CM (2010) Parasitism by Cuscuta pentagona sequentially induces JA and SA defense pathways in tomato. Plant Cell Environ 33:290–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JD, Mescher MC, De Moraes CM (2013) Implications of bioactive solute transfer from hosts to parasitic plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:464–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stam JM, Kroes A, Li YH, Gols R, van Loon JJA, Poelman EH, Dicke M (2014) Plant interactions with multiple insect herbivores: from community to genes. Ann rev. Plant Biol 65:689–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stermitz FR, Pomeroy M (1992) Chemistry of the schrophulariaceae. 23. Iridoid glycosides from Castilleja purpurea and C. indivisa, and quinolizidine alkaloid transfer from Lupinus texensis to C. indivisa via root parasitism. Biochem Syst Ecol 20:473–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stermitz FR, Belofsky GN, Ng D, Singer MC (1989) Quinolizidine alkaloids obtained by Pedicularis-semibarbata (scrophulariaceae) from Lupinus-fulcratus (leguminosae) fail to influence the specialist herbivore Euphydryas-editha (lepidoptera. J Chem Ecol 15:2521–2530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Siemens DH, Decher MB, Mitchell-Olds T (1999) Ecological costs of plant resistance to herbivores in the currency of pollination. Evolution 53:1105–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler JS, Stout MJ, Karban R, Duffey SS (2001) Jasmonate-mediated induced plant resistance affects a community of herbivores. Ecol Entomol 26:312–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler JS, Agrawal AA, Halitschke R (2010) Salicylate-mediated interactions between pathogens and herbivores. Ecology 91:1075–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Theodoratus D, Bowers MD (1999) Effects of sequestered iridoid glycosides on prey choice of the prairie wolf spider, Lycosa carolinensis. J Chem Ecol 25:283–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilarino MD, Mareggiani G, Grass MY, Leicach SR, Ravetta DA (2005) Post-damage alkaloid concentration in sweet and bitter lupin varieties and its effect on subsequent herbivory. J Appl Entomol 129:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wink M (1983) Wounding-induced increase of quinolizidine alkaloid accumulation in lupin leaves. Z Naturforsch(C) 38:905–909

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Adler lab members, D. Chan, L. Ndanga, and A. Soleil with plant propagation and data collection, A. Agrawal and A. Kessler labs for help with phytohormone analysis, C. Joyner and colleagues at the UMass CNS greenhouses, Dudley Farman (Nat Res Inst) for help with chemical analysis, and S. McArt and two anonymous reviewers for providing valuable feedback on this manuscript. Thanks to Fulbright Fellowship (MCT), Faculty for the Future Fellowship (MCT), Plant Biology Graduate program (MCT), USDA/CSREES (Hatch) MAS000411 (LSA) and USDA NRI 2008-02346 (LSA) for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muvari Connie Tjiurutue.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The study was funded by Fulbright Fellowship (MCT), Faculty for the Future Fellowship (MCT), Plant Biology Graduate program (MCT), USDA/CSREES (Hatch) MAS000411 (LSA) and USDA NRI 2008–02,346 (LSA).

Conflict of Interest

Author LSA has received recent research grants from USDA-AFRI, NSF-DEB, the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (co-PI), and the Dartmouth Scholarly Innovation and Advancement Awards (co-PI). All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 118 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tjiurutue, M.C., Stevenson, P.C. & Adler, L.S. Messages from the Other Side: Parasites Receive Damage Cues from their Host Plants. J Chem Ecol 42, 821–828 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0746-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0746-3

Keywords

Navigation