Skip to main content
Log in

Non-Target Impacts of an Attract-and-Kill Formulation Based on Plant Volatiles: Responses of some Generalist Predators

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Responses of non-target insects to a blend of plant volatiles used as components in an attract-and-kill formulation for Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were studied in an Australian cotton field. Two experiments, one involving suction sampling during the day and the other at night, were conducted. Rows that had been treated with the volatile blend, with no added insecticide, were sampled with a large suction sampler 18, 42, and 85 h (day experiment) and 6, 30, and 78 h (night experiment) after treatment. Rows located 5, 10, 20, and 300 m away from the treated row were similarly sampled. Of seven generalist predators, only one accumulated on the treated rows compared to the untreated rows. Of the other six, five were found in lower numbers on the treated rows, and for one no significant effects were detected. Compared to pre-spray baseline levels, numbers of several taxa increased across the whole field after spraying, suggesting area-wide attraction, but localized responses to the treated rows were weak, and apparent repellence was more common than attraction. We suggest that attract-and-kill with plant volatiles should have minimal effects on populations of these predators, and is likely to be compatible with integrated pest management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biondi A, Mommaerts V, Smagghe G, Vinuela E, Zappala L, Desneux N (2012) The non-target impact of spinosyns on beneficial arthropods. Pest Manag Sci 68:1523–1536

  • Bruce TJ (2000) The olfactory basis for attraction of the bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to host-plant flowers. PhD Thesis, University of Greenwich.

  • Bruce TJA, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM (2005) Insect host location: A volatile situation. Trends Plant Sci 10:269–274

  • Del Socorro AP, Gregg PC, Alter D, Moore CJ (2010a) Development of a synthetic plant volatile-based attracticide for female noctuid moths. I. Potential sources of volatiles attractive to Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aust J Entomol 49:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Socorro AP, Gregg PC, Hawes AJ (2010b) Development of a synthetic plant volatile-based attracticide for female noctuid moths. III. Insecticides for adult Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aust J Entomol 49:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher S, Wilson L, Mensah R (2005) Integrated pest management guidelines for cotton production systems in Australia. Australian Cotton CRC, Narrabri, Australia.

  • Franzmann B (2002) Hippodamia variegata (Gioeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidiae), a predacious ladybird new in Australia. Aust J Entomol 41:375–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilles M, Zhao J, An M, Agboola S (2010) Chemical composition and antimicrobial properties of essential oils of three Australian Eucalyptus species. Food Chem 119:731–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg PC, Greive KA, Del Socorro AP, Hawes AJ (2010a) Research to realisation: The challenging path for novel pest management products in Australia. Aust J Entomol 49:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg PC, Del Socorro AP, Henderson GS (2010b) Development of a synthetic plant volatile-based attracticide for female noctuid moths. II. Bioassays of synthetic plant volatiles as attractants for the adults of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aust J Entomol 49:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Mishra S, Malik A, Satya S (2014) Biocontrol potential of essential oil monoterpenes against housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 100:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landolt PJ, Smithhisler CL, Zack RS, Camelo L (2006) Attraction of Heliothis belladonna (Henry and Edwards) to the sex pheromone of the corn earworm moth, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 79:303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landolt PJ, Adams T, Zack RS, Crabo L (2011) A diversity of moths (Lepidoptera) trapped with two feeding attractants. Ann Entomol Soc Am 104:498–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landolt PJ, Toth M, Meagher RL, Szarukan I (2013) Interaction of acetic acid and phenylacetaldehyde as attractants for trapping pest species of moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag Sci 69:245–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez JD, Lingren PD (1994) Feeding response of adult Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) to commercial phagostimulants. J Econ Entomol 87:1653–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez JD, Latheef MA, Hoffmann WC (2011) Mortality and reproductive effects of ingested spinosad on adult bollworms. Pest Manag Sci 67:220–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah RK, Macpherson I (2010) Lure-and-kill as reduced-risk strategy for managing Helicoverpa spp. on conventional cotton crops within transgenic cotton fields. J Biocontrol 24:91–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensah RK, Gregg PC, Del Socorro AP, Moore CJ, Hawes AJ, Watts N (2013) Integrated pest management in cotton: Exploiting behaviour-modifying (semiochemical) compounds for managing cotton pests. Crop Pasture Sci 64:763-773

  • Pyke BA, Brown EH (1996) The cotton pest and beneficial guide. Cotton Research and Development Corporation, Narrabri, Australia, p 51

  • R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 15 January 2016

  • Skiri HT, Stranden M, Sandoz JC, Menzel R, Mustaparta H (2005) Associative learning of plant odorants activating the same or different receptor neurones in the moth Heliothis virescens. J Exp Biol 208:787–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley JN (1997) The seasonal abundance and impact of predatory arthropods on Helicoverpa spp. in Australian cotton fields. Ph.D. thesis, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

  • Stranden M, Rostelien T, Liblikas I, Alamaas T, Borg-Karlson A, Mustaparta H (2003) Receptor neurones in three heliothine moths responding to floral and inducible plant volatiles. Chemoecology 13:143–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S, Fourth edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson L, Downes S, Khan M, Whitehouse M, Baker G, Grundy P, Maas S (2013) IPM in the transgenic era: A review of the challenges from emerging pests in Australian cotton systems. Crop Pasture Sci 64:737–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzgall P, Kirsch P, Cork A (2010) Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management. J Chem Ecol 36:80–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Rodney Dunlop for assistance with the suction sampling studies. The Australian Cotton Cooperative Research Centre provided funding and access to the field site, and AgBiTech Pty Ltd. provided the plant volatile formulation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter C. Gregg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gregg, P.C., Del Socorro, A.P. & Binns, M.R. Non-Target Impacts of an Attract-and-Kill Formulation Based on Plant Volatiles: Responses of some Generalist Predators. J Chem Ecol 42, 676–688 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0727-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0727-6

Keywords

Navigation