Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 1003–1006 | Cite as

Bacteria Associated with a Tree-Killing Insect Reduce Concentrations of Plant Defense Compounds

  • Celia K. Boone
  • Ken Keefover-Ring
  • Abigail C. Mapes
  • Aaron S. Adams
  • Jörg Bohlmann
  • Kenneth F. Raffa


Bark beetles encounter a diverse array of constitutive and rapidly induced terpenes when attempting to colonize living conifers. Concentrations of these compounds at entry sites can rapidly reach levels toxic to beetles, their brood, and fungal symbionts. Large numbers of beetles can overwhelm tree defenses via pheromone-mediated mass attacks, but the mechanisms are poorly understood. We show that bacteria associated with mountain pine beetles can metabolize monoterpenes and diterpene acids. The abilities of different symbionts to reduce concentrations of different terpenes appear complementary. Serratia reduced concentrations of all monoterpenes applied to media by 55–75 %, except for α-pinene. Beetle-associated Rahnella reduced (−)- and (+)-α-pinene by 40 % and 45 %, respectively. Serratia and Brevundimonas reduced diterpene abietic acid levels by 100 % at low concentrations. However, high concentrations exhausted this ability, suggesting that opposing rates of bacterial metabolism and plant induction of terpenes are critical. The two major fungal symbionts of mountain pine beetle, Grosmannia clavigera and Ophiostoma montium were highly susceptible to abietic acid. Grosmannia clavigera did not reduce total monoterpene concentrations in lodgepole pine turpentine. We propose the ability of bark beetles to exert landscape-scale impacts may arise partly from micro-scale processes driven by bacterial symbionts.


Bark beetles Conifers Detoxification Plant defense Symbiosis Terpenes 

Supplementary material

10886_2013_313_MOESM1_ESM.docx (31 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 31.3 kb)


  1. Adams AS, Currie CR, Cardoza Y, Klepzig KD, Raffa KF (2009) Effects of symbiotic bacteria and tree chemistry on the growth and reproduction of bark beetle fungal symbionts. Can J For Res 39:1133–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams AS, Boone CK, Bohlmann J, Raffa KF (2011) Responses of bark beetle-associated bacteria to host monoterpenes and their relationship to insect life histories. J Chem Ecol 37:808–817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams AS, Aylward F, Adams SM, Erbilgin N, Aukema BH, Currie CR, Suen G, Raffa KF (2013) Mountain pine beetles colonizing historical and naïve host trees are associated with a bacterial community highly enriched in genes contributing to terpene metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3468–3475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bicas JL, Fontanille P, Pastore GM, Larroche C (2008) Characterization of monoterpene biotransformation in two pseudomonads. J Appl Microbiol 105:1991–2001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleiker KP, Six DL (2007) Dietary benefits of fungal associates to an eruptive herbivore: potential implications of multiple associates on host population dynamics. Environ Entomol 36:1384–1396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blomquist GJ, Figueroa-Teran R, Aw M, Song MM, Gorzalski A, Abbott NL, Chang E, Tittiger C (2010) Pheromone production in bark beetles. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40:699–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cane DE, Ikeda H (2012) Exploration and mining of the bacterial terpenome. Accounts Chem Res 45:463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardoza YJ, Klepzig KD, Raffa KF (2006) Bacteria in oral secretions of an endophytic insect inhibit antagonistic fungi. Ecol Entomol 31:636–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis TS, Hofstetter RW (2011) Reciprocal interactions between the bark beetle-associated yeast Ogataea pini and host plant phytochemistry. Mycologia 103:1201–1207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faccoli M, Schlyter F (2007) Conifer phenolic resistance markers are bark beetle antifeedant semiochemicals. Agric For Entomol 9:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall DE, Zerbe P, Jancsik S, Quesada AL, Dullat H, Madilao LL, Yuen M, Bohlmann J (2013) Evolution of conifer diterpene synthases: diterpene resin acid biosynthesis in lodgepole pine and jack pine involves monofunctional and bifunctional diterpene synthases. Plant Physiol 161:600–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamberger B, Ohnishi T, Seguin A, Bohlmann J (2011) Evolution of diterpene metabolism: Sitka spruce CYP720B4 catalyzes multiple oxidations in resin acid biosynthesis of conifer defense against insects. Plant Physiol 157:1677–1695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee S, Kim JJ, Breuil C (2006) Pathogenicity of Leptographium longiclavatum associated with Dendroctonus ponderosae to Pinus contorta. Can J For Res 36:2864–2872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morales-Jimenez J, Zuniga G, Villa-Tanaca L, Hernandez-Rodriguez C (2009) Bacterial community and nitrogen fixation in the red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Microb Ecol 58:879–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morales-Jimenez J, Zuniga G, Ramirez-Saad HC, Hernandez-Rodriguez C (2012) Gut-associated bacteria throughout the life cycle of the bark beetle Dendroctonus rhizophagus Thomas and Bright (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and their cellulolytic activities. Microb Ecol 64:268–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raffa KF, Aukema BH, Erbilgin N, Klepzig KD, Wallin KF (2005) Interactions among conifer terpenoids and bark beetles across multiple levels of scale: an attempt to understand links between population patterns and physiological processes. In: Romeo JT (ed) Recent advances in phytochemistry. Elsevier. pp 79–118Google Scholar
  17. Sandstrom P, Welch WH, Blomquist GJ, Tittiger C (2006) Functional expression of a bark beetle cytochrome P450 that hydroxylates myrcene to ipsdienol. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 36:835–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scott JJ, Oh DC, Yuceer MC, Klepzig KD, Clardy J, Currie CR (2008) Bacterial protection of beetle-fungus mutualism. Science 322:63–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Six DL, Klepzig KD (2004) Dendroctonus bark beetles as model systems for studies on symbiosis. Symbiosis 37:207–232Google Scholar
  20. Wang Y, Lim L, DiGuistini S, Robertson G, Bohlmann J, Breuil C (2013) A specialized ABC efflux transporter GcABC-G1 confers monoterpene resistance to Grosmannia clavigera, a bark beetle-associated fungal pathogen of pine trees. New Phytol 197:886–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Celia K. Boone
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ken Keefover-Ring
    • 1
    • 3
  • Abigail C. Mapes
    • 1
    • 4
  • Aaron S. Adams
    • 1
  • Jörg Bohlmann
    • 5
  • Kenneth F. Raffa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Lutte Biologique et Écologie SpatialeUniversité Libre de BruxellesBruxellesBelgium
  3. 3.Umeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant PhysiologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  4. 4.Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of MedicineBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  5. 5.Michael Smith LaboratoriesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations