Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 36, Issue 9, pp 933–942 | Cite as

Male-Specific Cuticular Compounds of the Six Drosophila paulistorum Semispecies: Structural Identification and Mating Effect

Article

Abstract

We have identified cuticular pheromones that sustain the integrity of the six Drosophila paulistorum semispecies. Hexane extracts of male and female cuticles were separated on a silica gel column and analyzed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Both sexes of each of the six semispecies have the same fifteen major cuticular components, all hydrocarbons ranging from C31 to C37. However, all males have four additional ester compounds. Bioassay observations showed that this four-component ester complex imparts a strong anti-aphrodisiac effect on intra-semispecific mating behavior, thus confirming its pheromonal role. The three major ester components are methyl (Z)-9-tetradecenoate (C15H28O2), 11-docosenyl acetate (C24H46O2), and 19-triacontenyl acetate (C32H62O2). The fourth ester is a di-unsaturated acetate with molecular formula C32H60O2, but the positions of unsaturation have not been determined. Bioassays indicate that the male-specific complex of the transitional semispecies, the relict ancestor, imparts anti-aphrodisiac effects on the other semispecies as well, but effectiveness decreases with phylogenetic distances. Across the six semispecies, the male-specific compounds are the same, but vary quantitatively. Apparently, the quantitative differences among these incipient species act efficiently to preclude hybridization in nature. Because Drosophila paulistorum is a cluster of incipient species, this opportunity to observe pheromonal influences on speciation is unique.

Key Words

Drosophila paulistorum Male pheromone Cuticular hydrocarbon Methyl (Z)-9-tetradecenoate 11-docosenyl acetate 19-triacontenyl acetate 

References

  1. Buser, H-R., Arn, H., Guerin, P., and Rauscher, S. 1983. Determination of double bond position in mono-unsaturated acetates by mass spectrometry of dimethyl disulfide adducts. Anal. Chem. 55:818–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlson, D.A., Roan, C-S., Yost, R.A. and Hector, J. 1989. Dimethyl disulfide derivatives of long chain alkenes, alkadienes, and alkatrienes for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem., 61, 1564–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chao, T.H., Gheta, A., Kim, Y-K., Cella, R., and Ehrman, L. 2001. Male pheromones of Drosophila paulistorum. Drosophila Information Service, 84:50–54.Google Scholar
  4. Dobzhansky,T and Spassky, B. 1959. Drosophila paulistorum, a cluster of species in Statu Nascendi. Proc. Natl.Acad.Sci.USA, 45:419–428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehrman, L. 1965. Direct observation of sexual isolation between allopatric and between sympatric strains of the different Drosophila paulistorum races. Evolution 19:459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehrman, L. 1975. Reproductive Isolation pp. 71–74 in Drosophila. Animal Behavior in Laboratory and Field. E.O. Price (ed.). Second ed. rev. San Francisco: Wm Freeman, and Teachers Manual, 35–36.Google Scholar
  7. Ehrman, L. and Kim, Y-K. 1998. Courtship. pp.638-648 in Encyclopedia of Comparative Psychology. G. Greenberg and M. Haraway (eds.). Garland: New York.Google Scholar
  8. Ehrman, L. and Powell, J. 1982. The Drosophila willistoni species group. pp. 193-225 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. M. Ashburner, H.L. Carson and J.N. Thompson (eds.). London:Academic,.Google Scholar
  9. Ehrman L., Perelle, I., and Factor, J. 1995. Endosymbiotic infectivity in Drosophila paulistorum semispecies. Chapter 18, 241–261 in L. Levine (ed.) Genetics of Natural Populations, The Continuing Influence of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Columbia University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  10. Elens, A.A., and Wattiaux J. M. 1964. Direct observation of sexual isolation. Drosophila Information Service 39:118–119.Google Scholar
  11. Ferveur, J. 1996. The pheromonal role of cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila melanogaster. BioEssays 19:353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gleason, J.M., Griffith, E.C., and Powell, J.R. 1998. A molecular phylogeny of the Drosophila willistoni group: conflicts between species, Evolution 52:1093–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, A.G. 1992 Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry, 2nd ed. CRC Press, p. 131–134.Google Scholar
  14. Jallon, J.-M. 1984 A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14: 441–476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jallon, J.-M. and Penchine, J.M. 1989. Une autre race chimique de Drosophila melanogaster en Afrique. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 309: 1551–1556.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, Y-K, Phillips, D.R., Chao, T., and Ehrman, L. 2004. Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. VI. Quantitative variation in cuticular hydrocarbons” Behav. Genet. 34: 385–394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Knoppien, P. 1985. Rare-male advantage: a review. Biological Reviews 60:81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonard, J. and Ehrman, L. 1983. Does the rare male advantage result from faulty experimental design? Genetics 104:713–716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Marcillac, F., Grosjean, Y., and Ferveur, J.-F. 2005. A single mutation alters production and discrimination of Drosophila sex pheromones. Proc. R. Soc. B 272:303–309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mclafferty, F.W. and Turecek, F. 1993. Interpretation of Mass Spectra 4th ed. pp. 252–257.Google Scholar
  21. Richmond, R. and Ehrman, L. 1974. Incidence of repeated mating in Drosophila paulistorum. Experientia 30:489–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Natural and Social Sciences, Purchase CollegeState University of New YorkPurchaseUSA

Personalised recommendations