Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction Between Visual and Olfactory Cues During Host Finding in the Tomato Fruit Fly Neoceratitis cyanescens

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Herbivorous insects searching for a host plant need to integrate a sequence of multimodal sensory inputs. We conducted a series of no-choice experiments in a laboratory wind tunnel to examine the behavioral response of the specialist fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens (Diptera: Tephritidae), to host visual and olfactory stimuli presented singly or in combination (e.g., colored fruit model with or without host fruit odor). We also studied the influence of wind flow, age, and sex on the response of flies. In two-choice experiments, we evaluated the ability of mature females to discriminate between two fruit models emitting host vs. non-host fruit odor or clean air. Neoceratitis cyanescens mature females can use independently or interactively olfactory and visual stimuli to locate their host, whereas immature females and males respond primarily to host fruit odor. In the absence of wind, mature females mainly use visual information to locate the host fruit. In wind, host fruit odor significantly increases the probability and speed of locating the host fruit. In a two-choice situation between two bright orange spheres, flies accurately detected the sphere emitting host fruit odor vs. non-host fruit odor or odorless air. Nevertheless, they preferred to land on the bright orange sphere when the sphere emitting host fruit odor was blue. Furthermore, when odor source and fruit model were spatially decoupled (90 or 180°), >50% flies that landed on the fruit model initially performed an oriented flight toward the odor source, then turned back to the fruit model while in flight or after one landing, thus suggesting visual information to be the ultimate indicator of host fruit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aluja, M., and Prokopy, R. J. 1992. Host search behavior by Rhagoletis pomonella flies: inter-tree movement patterns in response to wind-borne fruit volatiles under field conditions. Physiol. Entomol. 17:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aluja, M., and Prokopy, R. J. 1993. Host odor and visual stimulus interaction during intratree host finding behavior of Rhagoletis pomonella flies. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:2671–2696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, L. A., Reissig, W. H., and Roelofs, W. L. 1988. Specificity of olfactory responses in the tephritid fruit fly Rhagoletis pomonella. Entomol. Exp. App. 47:211–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barton Browne, L., Smith, P. H., van Gerwen, A. C., and Gillott, C. 1990. Quantitative aspects of the effect of mating on readiness to lay in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. J. Insect Behav. 3:637–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. J. 1990. Searching behavior patterns in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35:447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. J., Kipp, L. R., and Collins, R. D. 1995. Orientation mechanisms: the role of chemo-orientation in search behavior, pp. 105–153, in R. T. Cardé and W. J. Bell (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E. A., and Chapman, R. F. 1994. Behavior: the process of host-plant finding, pp. 95–116, in E. A. Bernays and R. F. Chapman (eds.). Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björklund, N., Nordlander, G., and Bylund, H. 2005. Olfactory and visual stimuli used in orientation to conifer seedlings by the pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. Physiol. Entomol. 30:225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brévault. T., and Quilici, S. 1999. Factors affecting behavioral responses to visual stimuli in the tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens. Physiol. Entomol. 24:333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brévault. T., and Quilici, S. 2000a. Diel patterns of reproductive activities in the tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens. Physiol. Entomol. 25:233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brévault, T., and Quilici, S. 2000b. Relationships between temperature, development and survival of different life stages of the tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 94:25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brévault, T., and Quilici, S. 2007a. Visual response of the tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens, to colored fruit models. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 125:45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brévault, T., and Quilici, S. 2007b. Influence of habitat pattern on visual orientation during host finding in the tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens. Bull. Entomol. Res. 97:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brévault, T., and Quilici, S. 2010. Flower and fruit volatiles assist host plant location in the Tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens. Physiol. Entomol. 35:9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. A., and Borden, J. H. 2006. Close-range, in-flight integration of olfactory and visual information by a hostseeking bark beetle. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 120:91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardé, R. T. 1984. Chemo-orientation in flying insects, pp 111–124, in W. J. Bell and R. T. Cardé (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardé, R. T., and Willis, M. A. 2008. Navigational strategies used by insects to find distant, Wind-Borne sources of odor. J. Chem. Ecol. 34:854–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J. J., and Prokopy, R. J. 1994. Apple maggot fly response to red sphere traps in relation to fly age and experience. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 73:279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, J. 1973. Elevage permanent de Pardalaspis cyanescens (Diptera : Tephritidae) sur hôte végétal de remplacement. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 9:853–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy, T. 2006. XLStat, version 2006. Addinsoft, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, T. W., and Johnstone, R. A. 2003. Optimal assessment of multiple cues. Proc. R. Soc. London B., 270:1637–1643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, B. L., Reissig, W. H., and Roelofs, W. L. 1982. Identification of apple volatiles attractive to apple maggot fly. J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1473–1487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, S., and Collier, R. H. 2000. Host-plant selection by insects: a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96:91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, A. A., and Feder, J. L. 2006. Divergent preferences of Rhagoletis pomonella host races for olfactory and visual fruit cues. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 119:121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyret, J., Markwell, P. M., and Raguso, R. 2007. The effect of decoupling olfactory and visual stimuli on the foraging behavior of Manduca sexta. J. Exp. Biol. 210:1398–1405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. A., Prokopy, R. J., and Hosmer, D. W. 1994. Distance of response to host tree models by female apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera: Tephritidae): interaction of visual and olfactory stimuli. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2393–2413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, D. L., and White, I. M. 1997. The identity of Trirhithrum nigrum (Graham) and some new combinations in Ceratitis MacLeay (Diptera:Tephritidae). Entomologist 116:192–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, E. B., Messing, R. H., Klungness, L. M., and Carvalho, L. A. 2000. Flight tunnel responses of Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to olfactory and visual stimuli. J. Insect Behav. 13:525–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsoyannos, B. I. 1989. Response to shape, size and color, pp. 307–324, in A. S. Robinson and G. Hooper (eds.). Fruit Flies, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests 3B, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulahci, I. G., Dornhaus, A., and Papaj, D. R. 2008. Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumble-bees. Proc. R. Soc. B 275:797–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landolt, P. J., and Molina, O. 1996. Host-finding by cabbage looper moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): learning of host odor upon contact with host foliage. J. Insect Behav. 9:899–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn Jr, C. E., Feder, J. L., Nojima, S., Dambroski, H. R., Berlocher, S. H., and Roelofs, W. L. 2003. Fruit odor discrimination and sympatric host race formation in Rhagoletis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100:11490–11493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, C. E. Jr, Nojima, S., and Roelofs, W. L. 2004. Antagonistic effects of non-host fruit volatiles on discrimination of host fruit by Rhagoletis pomonella flies infesting apple (Malus spp.), hawthorn (Crataegus spp.), and flowering dogwood (Cornus florida). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 114:97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, C. E. Jr, Dambroski, H. R., Nojima, S., Feder, J. L., Berlocher, S. H., and Roelofs, W. L. 2005. Variability in response specificity of apple, hawthorn, and flowering dogwood-infesting Rhagoletis flies to host fruit volatile blends: implications for sympatric host shifts. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 116:55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morehead, S. A., and Feener, D. H. 2000. Visual and chemical cues used in host location and acceptance by a dipteran parasitoid. J. Insect Behav. 13:613–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nojima, S., Linn, C.E. Jr, and Roelofs, W. L. 2003a. Identification of host fruit volatiles from flowering dogwood (Cornus florida) attractive to dogwood-origin Rhagoletis pomonella flies. J. Chem. Ecol. 29:2347–2357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nojima, S., Linn, C.E. Jr, Zhang, A., Morris, B., and Roelofs, W. L. 2003b. Identification of host fruit volatiles from hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) attractive to hawthorn-origin Rhagoletis pomonella flies. J. Chem. Ecol. 29:319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • OEPP/EPPO-CABI. 1997. Quarantine Pests for Europe. 2nd edn. OEPP/CABI.

  • Papaj, D. R. 2000. Ovarian dynamics and host use. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45:423–448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R. J., and Owens, E. D. 1983. Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28:337–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R. J., and Roitberg, B. D. 1984. Foraging behavior of true fruit flies [Tephritidae]. Am. Sci. 72:41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R. J., Green, T. A., and Vargas, R. I. 1990. Dacus dorsalis flies can learn to find and accept host fruit. J. Insect Behav. 3:663–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R. J., Bergweiler, C., Galarza, L., and Schwerin, J. 1994. Prior experience affects the visual ability of Rhagoletis pomonella flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to find host fruit. J. Insect Behav. 7:663–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausher, M. D. 1978. Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 34:342–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitberg, B. D. 1985. Search dynamics in fruit-parasitic insects. J. Insect Physiol. 31:865–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, L. M., Van Loon, J. J. A., and Dicke, M. 2005. Insect-Plant Biology. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szentesi, A., Hopkins, T. L., and Collins, R. D. 1996. Orientation responses of the grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes, to visual, olfactory, and wind stimuli and their combinations. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 80:539–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. L., Phelan, P. L., and Nault, L. R. 1990. Interaction between visual and olfactory stimuli during host-finding by leafhopper, Dalbulus maidis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2121–2133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L. E. M., Lewis, W. J., Papaj, D. R., and van Lenteren, J. C. 1990. A variable-response model for parasitoid foraging behavior. J. Insect Behav. 3:471–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L. E. M., Lewis, W. J., and Cardé, R. T. 1995. Chemoreception and integration: Parasitoid foraging and learning, pp. 65–101, in R. T. Cardé and W. J. Bell (eds.). Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackers, F. L., and Lewis, W. J. 1993. Olfactory and visual learning and their combined influence on host location by the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes (Cresson). Biol. Control 4:105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, A. J., Linn, C., Wright, S., Prokopy, R. J., Reissig, W., and Roelofs, W. 1999. Identification of a new blend of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:1221–1232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Région Réunion and the European Union - Commission de l’Océan Indien, Programme Régional de Recherche appliquée sur les Mouches des Fruits, Convention N° 7.ACP.RPR.400ID N° REG (RIN) 7502. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Brévault.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brévault, T., Quilici, S. Interaction Between Visual and Olfactory Cues During Host Finding in the Tomato Fruit Fly Neoceratitis cyanescens . J Chem Ecol 36, 249–259 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9766-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9766-6

Keywords

Navigation