Abstract
Several studies have shown intraspecific geographical variation in the composition of sex pheromones. Pheromone lures from North America and Europe were not effective against the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil, so we examined the composition of the sex pheromone produced by females from Brazilian populations. Virgin female gland extracts contained (Z)-7-dodecenyl acetate (Z7-12:Ac), (E)-7-dodecenyl acetate (E7-12:Ac), dodecyl acetate, (Z)-9-dodecenyl acetate, (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14:Ac), (Z)-10-tetradecenyl acetate, tetradecyl acetate/(Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (Z11-16:Ac), and (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate. The relative proportions of each acetate were 0.8:1.2:0.6:traces:82.8:0.3:1.5:12.9, respectively. This is the first time that E7-12:Ac has been reported from the pheromone gland of S. frugiperda. Only three compounds, Z9-14:Ac, Z7-12:Ac, and E7-12:Ac, elicited antennal responses, and there were no differences in catch between traps baited with either Z7-12:Ac + Z9-14:Ac or Z7-12:Ac + Z9-14:Ac + Z11-16:Ac blends. However, the Z7-12:Ac + Z9-14:Ac + E7-12:Ac blend was significantly better than Z7-12:Ac + Z9-14:Ac, indicating that E7-12:Ac is an active component in the sex pheromone of the Brazilian populations of S. frugiperda.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade, R., Rodriguez, C., and Oehlschlager, A. C. 2000. Optimization of a pheromone lure for Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) in Central America. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 11:609–613.
Andrews, K. L. 1988. Latin American research on Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Fla. Entomol. 71:630–650.
Anglade, P., Stockel, J., Awadallah, W., Baa, F., and Berger H. 1984. Intraspecific sex-pheromone variability in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Agronomie 4:183–187.
Busato, G. R., Grutzmacher, A. D., Garcia, M. S., Giolo, F. P., and Martins, A. F. 2002. Consumo e utilização de alimento por Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) originária de diferentes regiões do Rio Grande do Sul, das culturas do milho e do arroz irrigado. Neotrop. Entomol. 31:525–529.
Cruz, I., Oliveira, L. J., Oliveira, A. C., and Vasconcelos, C. A. 1996. Efeito do nível de saturação de alumínio em solos ácidos sobre os danos de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) em milho. An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 25:293–297.
Descoins, C., Silvain, J. F., Lalannecassaou, B., and Cheron, H. 1988. Monitoring of group pests by sexual trapping of males in the French West Indies and Guyana. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 21:53–65.
El-Sayed, A. M., Delisle, J., De Lury N., Gut, L. J., Judd, G. J. R., Legrand, S., Reissig, W. H., Roelofs, W. L., Unelius, C. R., and Trimble, R. M. 2003. Geographic variation in pheromone chemistry, antennal electrophysiology, and pheromone-mediated trap catch of North American populations of the obliquebanded leafroller. Environ. Entomol. 32:470–476
Gemeno, C., Lutfallah, A. F., and Haynes, K. F. 2000. Pheromone blend variation and cross-attraction among populations of the black cutworm moth (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93:1322–1328.
Hansson, B. S., Tóth, M., Löfstedt, C., Szöcs, G., Subchev, M., and Löfqvist, J. 1990. Pheromone variation among Eastern and a Western Asian population of the turnip moth Agrotis segetum. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:1611–1622.
Jones, R. L. and Sparks, A. N. 1979. (Z)-9-Tetradecen-1-ol acetate: a secondary sex pheromone of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith). J. Chem. Ecol. 5:721–725.
Levy, C. H., Garcia-Maruniak, A., and Maruniak, J. E. 2002. Strain identification of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) insects and cells line: PCR-RFLP of cytochrome oxidase C subunit I gene. Fla. Entomol. 85:186–190.
Lo, C. C. and Chao, P. M. 1990. Replacement of carcinogenic solvent HMPA by DMI in insect sex pheromone synthesis. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:3245–3253.
Löfstedt, C. 1990. Population variation and genetic control of pheromone communication systems in moths. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 54:199–218.
Löfstedt, C., Löfqvist, J., Lanne, B. S., Van Der Pers, J. N. C., and Hansson, B. S. 1986. Pheromone dialects in European turnip moths Agrotis segetum. Oikos 46:250–257.
Malo, E. A., Cruz-Lopez, L., Valle-Mora, J., Virgen, A., Sanchez, J. A., and Rojas, J. C. 2001. Evaluation of commercial pheromone lures and traps for monitoring male fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the coastal region of Chiapas, Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 84:659–664.
Malo, E. A., Castrejon-Gomez, V. R., Cruz-Lopez, L., and Rojas, J. C. 2004. Antennal sensilla and electrophysiological response of male and female Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to conspecific sex pheromone and plant odors. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97:1273–1284.
Marques, F. A., Mcelfresh, J. S., and Millar, J. G. 2000. Kováts retention index of monounsaturated C12, C14 and C16 alcohols, acetates and aldehydes commonly found in Lepidopteran pheromone blends. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 11:592–599.
Miller, D. R., Gibson, K. E., Raffa, K. F., Seybold, S. J., Teale, S. A., and Wood, D. L. 1997. Geographic variation in response of pine engraver, Ips. pini, and associated species to pheromone, lanierone. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2013–2031.
Mitchell, E. R., Tumlinson, J. H., and McNeil, J. N. 1985. Field evaluation of commercial pheromone formulations and traps using a more effective sex pheromone blend for the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 78:1364–1369.
Mitra, R. R. and Reddy, G. B. 1989. Selective cleavage of dimethylhydrazones to the carbonyl compounds using silica gel and its application in the synthesis of (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate. Synthesis 694–698.
Parra, J. R. P. 1986. Criação de insetos para estudos com patógenos, pp. 348–373, in S. B. Alves (ed.). Controle Microbiano de Insetos. Editora Manole, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pashley, D. P. 1986. Host-associated genetic differentiation in fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a sibling species complex? Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79:898–904.
Pashley, D. P., Johnson, S. J., and Sparks, A. N. 1985. Genetic population structure of migratory moths: the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78:756–762.
Pashley, D. P., Hammond, A. M., and Hardy, T. N. 1992. Reproductive isolating mechanisms in fall armyworm host strains (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85:400–405.
Perry, J. N., Wall, C., and Greenway, A. R. 1980. Latin square designs in field experiments involving insect sex attractants. Ecol. Entomol. 5:385–396.
Sekul, A. A. and Sparks, A. N. 1967. Sex pheromone of the fall armyworm moth: isolation, identification and synthesis. J. Econ. Entomol. 60:1270–1272.
Tóth, M., Löfstedt, C., Blair, B. W., Cabello, T., Farag, A. I., Hansson, B. S., Kovalev, B. G., Maini, S., Nesterov, E. A., Pajor, I., Sazonov, A. P., Shamshev, I. V., Subchev, M., and Szöcs, G. 1992. Attraction of male turnip moths Agrotis segetum (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to sex pheromone components and their mixtures at 11 sites in Europe, Asia, and Africa. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:1337–1347.
Tumlinson, J. H., Mitchell, E. R., Teal, P. E. A., Heath, R. R., and Mengelkoch, L. J. 1986. Sex pheromone of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith). Identification of components critical to attraction in the field. J. Chem. Ecol. 12:1909–1926.
Wu, W., Cottrell, C. B., Hansson, B. S., and Löfstedt, C. 1999. Comparative study of pheromone production and response in Swedish and Zimbabwean populations of the turnip moth, Agrotis segetum. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:177–196.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. K. Ogawa, Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., for furnishing pheromone samples, and G. C. R. Bernasconi for statistical analysis. This study was funded by FAPESP and CNPq/RHAE (Brazil) and IFS/OPCW (Sweden).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Batista-Pereira, L.G., Stein, K., de Paula, A.F. et al. Isolation, Identification, Synthesis, and Field Evaluation of the Sex Pheromone of the Brazilian Population of Spodoptera frugiperda . J Chem Ecol 32, 1085–1099 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9048-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9048-5