Identification of Sex Pheromone Components of a New Zealand Geometrid Moth, the Common Forest Looper Pseudocoremia suavis, Reveals a Possible Species Complex

  • A. R. Gibb
  • D. Comeskey
  • L. Berndt
  • E. G. Brockerhoff
  • A. M. El-Sayed
  • H. Jactel
  • D. M. Suckling
Article

Abstract

Gas chromatography–electroantennographic detection analysis of sex pheromone gland extracts of the common forest looper Pseudocoremia suavis (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), a polyphagous defoliator of introduced Pinaceae and many New Zealand trees, revealed four compounds that elicited antennal responses. The two major active compounds (6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadec-6-ene and (3Z,6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadeca-3,6-diene were identified by comparison with known standards. Of the two minor active compounds, one was tentatively identified as (3Z,6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxyhenicosa-3,6-diene, whereas the other could not be identified because of insufficient amounts in extracts. (6Z)-cis-9,10-Epoxynonadec-6-ene, (3Z,6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadeca-3,6-diene, and (3Z,6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxyhenicosa-3,6-diene were present in P. suavis gland extracts from Eyrewell Forest, a Pinus radiata plantation in the South Island of New Zealand, in a ratio of 35:65:5, respectively. Trapping trials in Eyrewell Forest established that (6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadec-6-ene attracted male P. suavis. However, addition of (3Z,6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxyhenicosa-3,6-diene to the lure at <10% of (6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadec-6-ene reduced capture of male moths, suggesting that one of its enantiomers was acting as a behavioral antagonist. During January–March of 2005, a blend trial involving single, binary, and ternary mixtures of the three components at Eyrewell Forest and at three other sites (two in the South Island and one in the North Island) revealed the existence of a second taxon of P. suavis at the three additional sites that was attracted to lures containing (3Z,6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadeca-3,6-diene, either singly or in binary and ternary mixtures with (6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadec-6-ene and (3Z,6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxyhenicosa-3,6-diene. This second taxon was not attracted to lures loaded solely with (6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadec-6-ene.

Keywords

Common forest looper Species complex Pseudocoremia suavis Pseudocoremia fenerata Pseudocoremia leucelaea Geometridae Ennominae Pinus radiata (6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadec-6-ene (3Z,6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxynonadeca-3,6-diene (3Z,6Z)-cis-9,10-epoxyhenicosa-3,6-diene Behavioral antagonist 

References

  1. Alma, P. J. 1977. Selidosema [= Pseudocoremia] suavis (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Forest and Timber Insects in New Zealand, No. 11. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  2. Ando, T., Ohsawa, H., Ueno, T., Kishi, H., Okamura, Y., and Hashimoto, S. 1993. Hydrocarbons with a homoconjugated polyene system and their monoepoxy derivatives: Sex attractants of geometrid and noctuid moths distributed in Japan. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:787–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ando, T., Kishi, H., Akashio, N., Qin, X., Saito, N., Abe, H., and Hashimoto, S. 1995. Sex attractants of geometrid and noctuid moths: Chemical characterization and field test of monoepoxides of 6,9-dienes and related compounds. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ando, T., Inomata, S., and Yamamoto, M. 2004. Lepidopteran sex pheromones. Top. Curr. Chem. 239:51–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berndt, L., Brockerhoff, E. G., Jactel, H., Weis, T., and Beaton, J. 2004. Biology and rearing of Pseudocoremia suavis, an endemic looper (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) with a history of outbreaks on exotic conifers. N. Z. Entomol. 27:73–82.Google Scholar
  6. Clare, G., Suckling, D. M., Bradley, S. J., Walker, J. T. S., Shaw, P. W., Daly, J. M., McLaren, G. F., and Wearing, C. H. 2000. Pheromone trap colour determines catch of non target insects. N. Z. Plant Prot. 53:216–220Google Scholar
  7. Dugdale, J. S. 1958. Structural characters of the larva of Selidosema [= Pseudocoremia] suavis (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Subfamily Ennominae). N. Z. Entomol. 2:24–33.Google Scholar
  8. Dugdale, J. S. 1989. New Zealand Lepidoptera; basic biogeography. N.Z. J. Zool. 16:679–687.Google Scholar
  9. El-Sayed, A. M. 2006. The Pherobase: Database of Insect Pheromones and Semiochemicals. http://www.pherobase.com.
  10. El-Sayed, A. M., Gibb, A. R., Suckling, D. M., Bunn, B., Fielder, S., Comeskey, D., Manning, L. A., Foster, S. P., Morris, B. D., Ando, T., and Mori, K. 2005. Identification of sex pheromone components of the painted apple moth: a tussock moth with a thermally labile pheromone component. J. Chem. Ecol. 31:633–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foster, S. P., Dugdale, J. S., and White, C. S. 1991. Sex pheromones and the status of the greenheaded and the brownheaded leafroller moths in New Zealand. N.Z. J. Zool. 18:63–74.Google Scholar
  12. Frérot, B. and Foster, S. P. 1991. Sex pheromone evidence for two distinct taxa within Graphania mutans (Walker). J. Chem. Ecol. 17:2077–2093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kováts, E. 1965. Gas chromatographic characterization of organic substances in the retention index system, pp. 229–247, in J. C. Giddings and R. A. Keller (eds.). Advances in Chromatography, Vol. 1. Edward Arnold Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  14. Marques, F. A., McElfresh, J. S., and Millar, J. G. 2000. Kováts retention indexes of monounsaturated C12, C14, and C16 alcohols, acetates and aldehydes commonly found in lepidopteran pheromone blends. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 11:592–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Millar, J. G. 2000. Polyene hydrocarbons and epoxides: a second major class of lepidopteran sex attractant pheromones. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45:575–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Millar, J. G., Giblin, M., Barton, D., and Underhill, E. W. 1991. Synthesis and field screening of chiral monounsaturated epoxides as lepidopteran sex attractants and sex pheromone components. J. Chem. Ecol. 17:911–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mori, K. 1998. Chirality and insect pheromones. Chirality 10:578–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nuttall, M. 1983. Pseudocoremia fenerata (Felder) (Lepidoptera, Geometridae): A native looper. Forest and Timber Insects in New Zealand, No. 56. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, pp. 4.Google Scholar
  19. SAS Institute Inc. 1998. Statview. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  20. Soulie, J. B. and Lallemand, Y. 1995. Access to unsaturated chiral epoxides. Part II. Synthesis of a component of the sex pheromone of Phragmatobia fuliginosa. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 6:625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Steck, W. F., Underhill, E. W., Bailey, B. K., and Chisholm, M. D. 1982. (Z)-7-Tetradecenal, a seasonally dependent sex pheromone of the W-marked cutworm, Spaelotis clandestina (Harris) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Entomol. 11:1119–1122.Google Scholar
  22. Stephens, A. E. A. 2001. Pseudocoremia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae) Systematics, biogeography and host plant associations. MSc thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  23. Suckling, D. M. and Karg, G. 2000. Pheromones and semiochemicals, pp. 63–99, in J. Rechcigl and N. Rechcigl (eds.). Biological and Biotechnical Control of Insect Pests. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  24. Szöcs, G., Tóth, M., Francke, W., Schmidt, F., Philipp, P., König, W. A., Mori, K., Hansson, B. S., and Löfstedt, C. 1993. Species discrimination in five species of winter-flying geometrids (Lepidoptera) based on chirality of semiochemicals and flight season. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:2721–2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. White, T. R. C. 1974. A hypothesis to explain outbreaks of looper caterpillars, with special reference to populations of Selidosema [= Pseudocoremia] suavis in a plantation of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. Oecologia 16:279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Windholz, M. (ed.) 1983. The Merck Index. Tenth Edition. Merck & Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Lei, G., and Shi, M. 1999. A facile synthetic method for chiral 1,2-epoxides and the total synthesis of chiral pheromone epoxides. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 10:837–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Gibb
    • 1
  • D. Comeskey
    • 2
  • L. Berndt
    • 3
  • E. G. Brockerhoff
    • 3
  • A. M. El-Sayed
    • 1
  • H. Jactel
    • 4
  • D. M. Suckling
    • 1
  1. 1.Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd.LincolnNew Zealand
  2. 2.Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd.Palmerston NorthNew Zealand
  3. 3.Ensis (Ensis—A joint venture of CSIRO and the New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.)Fendalton, ChristchurchNew Zealand
  4. 4.Institut National de la Recherche d'AgronomiquePierrotonFrance

Personalised recommendations