Abstract
The terpene composition of current-year buds of Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, was analyzed from before budburst to after buds were fully flushed. Terpene composition was measured at weekly intervals for several seasons at eight different locations in the southern interior of British Columbia, Canada. Discriminant functions relating terpene composition to suitability of buds for newly emerged western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman, were developed based on terpene profiles of the buds and bioassays measuring the suitability to budworms of a sister group of buds. Changes in percent composition of bud terpenes before and during budburst were closely associated with changes in the suitability of the buds to utilization by budworms at both the tree and site by date levels. Use of a degree-day scale for bud suitability removed much of the year-to-year variation, but remaining differences among sites suggest additional sources of variation influencing the insect-host plant relationship. The success of correctly classifying bud suitability using terpene profiles demonstrates the value of foliar terpenes as indicators of seasonal changes in suitability of Douglas-fir foliage during the critical spring emergence period of western spruce budworm. This indicator could be used to screen individual trees susceptible to budworm damage and identify sites at high risk of damaging defoliation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Campbell, R. W. 1993. Population dynamics of the major North American needle-eating budworms. Research Paper PNW-RP-463. USDA Forest Service, 222 pp.
R. G. Cates J. Zou (1990) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) population variation in terpene chemistry and its role in budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman) dynamics A. D. Watt S. R. Leather M. D. Hunter N. A. C. Kidd (Eds) Population Dynamics of Forest Insects Intercept Andover, UK 169–182
Z. Chen T. E. Kolb K. M. Clancy (2002) ArticleTitleThe role of monoterpenes in resistance of Douglas-fir to western spruce budworm defoliation J. Chem. Ecol. 28 897–920 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015297315104 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XktFSmtrg%3D Occurrence Handle12049230
Z. Chen K. M. Clancy T. E. Kolb (2003) ArticleTitleVariation in budburst phenology of Douglas-fir related to western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) fitness J. Econ. Entomol. 96 377–387 Occurrence Handle14994804
K. M. Clancy (2002) Mechanisms of resistance in trees to defoliators M. R. Wagner K. M. Clancy F. Lieuthier T. D. Paine (Eds) Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects Kluwer Academic Publishers The Netherlands 77–101
K. M. Clancy J. K. Itami D. P. Huebner (1993) ArticleTitleDouglas-fir nutrients and terpenes: potential resistance factors to western spruce budworm defoliation For. Sci. 39 78–94
Fettes, J. J. 1950. Investigations of sampling techniques for population studies of the spruce budworm on balsam fir in Ontario. Annual Progress Report Forest Insect Laboratory, Canadian Forest Service, Sault Ste-Marie.
Meidinger, D. and Pojar, J. 1991. Ecosystems of British Columbia. Special Report Series 6. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, Canada, 330 pp.
J. R. Nault (2003) ArticleTitleSite temperatures influence seasonal changes in terpene composition in Douglas-fir vegetative buds and current-year foliage Can. J. For. Res. 33 2269–2273 Occurrence Handle10.1139/x03-151
Nealis, V. G. 2003. Host-plant relationships and comparative ecology of conifer-feeding budworms (Choristoneura spp.), pp. 68–74, in M. L. Mcmanus and A. M. Liebhold (eds.). Proceedings: Ecology, Survey and Management of Forest Insects, Kraków, Poland, September 1–5, 2002. GTR NE-311. USDA Forest Service.
V. G. Nealis P. V. Lomic (1994) ArticleTitleHost-plant influence on the population ecology of the jack pine budworm, Choristoneura pinus (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Ecol. Entomol. 19 367–373
J. Régnière (1996) ArticleTitleGeneralized approach to landscape-wide seasonal forecasting with temperature-driven simulation models Environ. Entomol. 25 869–881
J. Régnière J. A. Logan (2003) Animal life cycle models M. Schwartz (Eds) Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science Kluwer Academic Publishers Netherlands 237–254
Shepherd, R. F. 1983. A technique to study phenological interactions between Douglas-fir buds and emerging second instar western spruce budworm, pp. 17–20, in R. L. Talerico and M. Montgomery (eds.). Proceedings of a Symposium on Forest Defoliator-Host Interactions: Comparison Between Gypsy Moth and Spruce Budworm. GTR NE-85. USDA Forest Service.
R. F. Shepherd (1992) ArticleTitleRelationship between attack rates and survival of western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and bud development of Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco Can. Entomol. 124 347–358
A. J. Thomson S. M. Moncrieff (1982) ArticleTitlePrediction of bud burst in Douglas-fir by degree-day accumulation Can. J. For. Res. 12 448–452
A. J. Thomson R. F. Shepherd J. W. E. Harris R. H. Silversides (1984) ArticleTitleRelating weather to outbreaks of western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in British Columbia Can. Entomol. 116 375–381
E. Von Rudloff G. E. Rehfeldt (1980) ArticleTitleChemosystematics studies in the genus Pseudotsuga. IV. Inheritance and geographic variation in the leaf oil terpenes of Douglas-fir from the Pacific Northwest Can. J. Bot. 58 546–556 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL3cXhvFCgurg%3D
M. R. Wagner K. M. Clancy R. W. Tinus (1989) ArticleTitleMaturational variation in needle essential oils from Pseudotsuga menziesii, Abies concolor and Picea engelmanii Phytochemistry 28 765–770 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXktVChsbY%3D
Acknowledgments
We thank Rod Turnquist and Vince Waring for field and laboratory assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nealis, V.G., Nault, J.R. Seasonal Changes in Foliar Terpenes Indicate Suitability Of Douglas-fir Buds for Western Spruce Budworm. J Chem Ecol 31, 683–696 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-3538-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-3538-8