Advertisement

Uniform Generators, Symbolic Extensions with an Embedding, and Structure of Periodic Orbits

  • David BurguetEmail author
  • Tomasz Downarowicz
Article
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

For a topological dynamical system \((X,T)\) we define a uniform generator as a finite measurable partition such that the symmetric cylinder sets in the generated process shrink in diameter uniformly to zero. The problem of existence and optimal cardinality of uniform generators has lead us to new challenges in the theory of symbolic extensions. At the beginning we show that uniform generators can be identified with so-called symbolic extensions with an embedding, i.e., symbolic extensions admitting an equivariant measurable selector from preimages. From here we focus on such extensions and we strive to characterize the collection of the corresponding extension entropy functions on invariant measures. For aperiodic zero-dimensional systems we show that this collection coincides with that of extension entropy functions in arbitrary symbolic extensions, which, by the general theory of symbolic extensions, is known to coincide with the collection of all affine superenvelopes of the entropy structure of the system. In particular, we recover, after Burguet (Monatsh Math 184:21–49, 2017), that an aperiodic zero-dimensional system is asymptotically h-expansive if and only if it admits an isomorphic symbolic extension. Next we pass to systems with periodic points, and we introduce the notion of a period tail structure, which captures the local growth rate of periodic orbits. Finally, we succeed in precisely identifying the wanted collection of extension entropy functions in symbolic extensions with an embedding: these are all the affine superenvelopes of the usual entropy structure which lie above certain threshold function determined by the period tail structure. This characterization allows us, among other things, to give estimates (and in examples to compute precisely) of the optimal cardinality of a uniform generator. As a byproduct, we prove a theorem saying that every zero-dimensional system admits an aperiodic zero-dimensional extension which is isomorphic on aperiodic measures and otherwise principal (periodic measures lift to measures of entropy zero).

Keywords

Entropy Generator Symbolic extension 

References

  1. 1.
    Boyle, M.: Lower entropy factors of sofic systems. Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 3, 541–557 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyle, M., Downarowicz, T.: The entropy theory of symbolic extensions. Invent. Math. 156, 119–161 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burguet, D.: Embedding asymptotically expansive systems. Monatsh. Math. 184, 21–49 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burguet, D.: Periodic expansiveness of smooth surface diffeomorphisms and applications. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (to appear)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buzzi, J.: Intrinsic ergodicity for smooth interval maps. Israel J. Math. 100, 125–161 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Downarowicz, T.: Entropy structure. J. Anal. Math. 96, 57–116 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Downarowicz, T.: Entropy in Dynamical Systems, New Mathematical Monographs, vol. 18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hochman, M.: Isomorphism and embedding into Markov shifts off universally null sets. Acta Appl. Math. 126(1), 187–201 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hochman, M.: Every Borel automorphism without finite invariant measures admits a two-set generator (preprint) arXiv:1508.02335
  10. 10.
    Krieger, W.: On the subsystems of topological Markov chains. Ergod. Theory. Dyn. Syst. 2, 195–202 (1882)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kulesza, J.: Zero-dimensional covers of finite-dimensional dynamical systems. Ergod. Theory. Dyn. Syst. 15, 939–950 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindenstrauss, E.: Mean dimension, small entropy factors, and an embedding theorem. Publ. Math. IHES 89, 227–262 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Misiurewicz, M.: Topological conditional entropy. Stud. Math. 55, 175–200 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ornstein, D. S.: Ergodic Theory, Randomness, and Dynamical Systems, James K. Whittemore Lectures in Mathematics Given at Yale University, Yale Mathematical Monographs, No. 5, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.-London (1974)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Serafin, J.: Universally finitary symbolic extensions. Fund. Math. 206, 281–285 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Serafin, J.: A faithful symbolic extension. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 11, 1051–1062 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shields, P.: The ergodic theory of discrete sample paths, vol. 13. AMS Graduate Studies in Mathematics (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS, Laboratoire de Probabilités, Statistique et Modélisation, LPSMSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
  2. 2.Faculty of Pure and Applied MathematicsWrocław University of TechnologyWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations